- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does modifying guns change gun debate?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:14 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I suppose to keep this in the DisplacedBuckeye mode, I should say "CSB".
You can say anything you like. How many people do you know that have what you claim to be "too many" firearms? I know several, and they they are more secure than Cabela's.
The point: my anecdotal evidence is better than your anecdotal evidence.
quote:
But more importantly if that's the case, what's the concern with occasional site verification.
What's the problem with being forced to open my home to the federal government for inspection?
Is that a serious question?
1
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:18 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
But if I own a car, and I left the car unlocked, and I left the keys in the engine, and someone stole it and ran over people... I would feel horrific.
People shouldn't do that.
There, problem solved.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:19 pm to beerJeep
quote:Because unless the targets are wearing body armor, a muzzle loaded derringer can be lethal.
What does that matter?
quote:At 400 yards? Not your FN Five-seven pistol.
So come on. Out of those guns, which would do the most damage?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Because unless the targets are wearing body armor, a muzzle loaded derringer can be lethal.
A muzzleloading Derringer can be lethal with body armor. Ban them.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:21 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:If you know several with too many firearms, how do you define too many?
How many people do you know that have what you claim to be "too many" firearms? I know several
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:23 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:quote:
How many people do you know that have what you claim to be "too many" firearms? I know several
If you know several with too many firearms, how do you define too many?
I didn't define it. You did.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:24 pm to NC_Tigah
Why are you putting up random situations? I simply asked which one would go through class 2 body armor. And which of those should be banned.
Although I do appreciate the Google to get the 5.7 correct. I do believe the secret service clue gave you that one.
Although I do appreciate the Google to get the 5.7 correct. I do believe the secret service clue gave you that one.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:24 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
I left the keys in the engine
Unless the thief is a talented mechanic, the car isn't moving.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:25 pm to TennesseeFan25
quote:
Dude purchased 30+ firearms in a year. That's not normal behavior for anyone.
speak for yourself
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:26 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:A Dodge Challenger can be lethal with body armor. Are we suggesting we ban those too?
A muzzleloading Derringer can be lethal with body armor. Ban them.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:27 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Nope.
I didn't define it. You did.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:27 pm to BamaFan365
quote:
here is nothing that can stop an event like this. If someone wants to kill a bunch of people, they will find a way.
It can be made a lot tougher to accomplish and the number of potential deaths can be reduced.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:28 pm to LSUFanHouston
In September 2004 the ATF decided that a 14 inch long shoestring was considered a machine gun:
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
A Dodge Challenger can be lethal with body armor. Are we suggesting we ban those too?
Nah, but we should make sure that anyone who has more than 5-10 of them is thoroughly inspected by the DOT. Psychological profiling, interviews, tracking. All of it.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Are we suggesting we ban those too?
Are you not familiar with the #BanTransportationOver30MPH movement?
Well today is your lucky day mon frere.
Why do we as a society not even bat an eye at all the unnecessary deaths caused by speedy transportation in metal death traps? Let's be honest with ourselves. Vehicles kill more people than guns each year. They are deadly. They are unsafe. They are everywhere.
For all of our history we got by at the speed of a horse. Why are we so willing to waste away so many beautiful lives just so we can get from a to b quicker? That is so selfish of us.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:32 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Nope.
Yep.
You even agreed that it is arbitrarily set at 50 in this discussion.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:35 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
Just because something can’t be eliminated 100% doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to curb it where possible. Imagine if we took that mindset after 9/11.
Flying in an airport would be significantly more convenient
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:35 pm to SlapahoeTribe
No shite, i'm scared to tell them how many i own 
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:37 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:What makes you think gun owners would react differently?
But if I own a car, and I left the car unlocked, and I left the keys in the engine, and someone stole it and ran over people... I would feel horrific.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:40 pm to TennesseeFan25
quote:
Frankly, this is a terrible mindset, and you should be ashamed. I have a common sense approach to it all. If we all realize it's bad, but are holding on to not allow liberals to win, or push more, that's bullshite. We can't refuse to make things better because of that. It reminds me of military spending system, we may not need new supplies/items/equipment, but we will spend every penny of our budget just to ensure we get that same amount back next year, and that's wrong.
Completely different arguments. One is prevention of the gradual erosion of this nations peoples' ability fornsef governence.
One is a prime example of government waste
Page 5 of 13
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News