Started By
Message

re: Does anyone realize Trump having classified docs not illegal?

Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:11 am to
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:11 am to
quote:

That Trump was/is such a known security risk that it was a risk to extend him that courtesy says nothing about Biden and everything about your God-King.


Resting your position on a dementia riddled cognitively compromised buffoon.

Case closed.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46835 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:15 am to
Those screaming the loudest that Trump had this or that, which the National Archives KNEW about for months, if not longer, are oddly oblivious to the fact that Hillary not only took but also DESTROYED documents that belonged to the State Dept.

She was never President. It was NEVER her call to be able to decide which docs to destroy, delete or transmit via unsecured home server.


If Trump committed a crime, Hillary committed mass murder.
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
14222 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Does anyone realize Trump having classified docs not illegal



Does anyone realize it doesnt matter?

They’re gonna hang whatever crime they want around his neck. Real or imagined, the gope will support it.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 7:19 am
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8689 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Any living former president still gets briefs,


Joe Biden ceased giving briefs to President Trump. This action was done as a prelude to the raid on Mar-a-Lago. All part of the effort to hang the bogus charge the former President is somehow engaged in espionage or selling top secret information to the Ruskies or whomever.

Just another dumbass Mickey Mouse effort by the Cabal to stop Donald J. Trump.

One corrupt determined bunch these Biden operatives.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 7:29 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
41990 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Unfortunately for our current fPOTUS, Biden considered him too great of a security risk and did not extend a clearance to him post 1/20. So he has the same rights to see classified information as any private citizen without a clearance - i.e. none.


But all the documents that he had at MAR are declassified.
Posted by 20 ton
BR
Member since Aug 2013
948 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:27 am to
quote:

That Trump was such a security risk


The problem with your statement is who is making the determination.

The same people that thought proven lies, bought and paid for by political opponents was enough cover to spy on a sitting President. Two FISA warrants were attested as verified after three days of Darerchiko(sp?)telling them it was bar talk.

The 53 officials that claimed the laptop was Russian disinformation. Never saw it or an investigative report and had some later admit it was about stopping Trump.

The FBI that turned down the laptop and didn’t get interested in it until the owner offered it to others. They then sat on it for a year ordering agents to not look into it and told Facebook to censor it.

This is more in a long line of abusive and unprecedented attacks on political opposition. Trump upset their power. Power they never intended to give up.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:35 am to
quote:

guess the elite powers that be don’t like a president represented the people instead of raining over the people and controlling them as slaves???





either that or trump mishandled sci materials he had no right to move 1 inch no less leave in boxes other people had access too.
nothing about that is acceptable. stop making excuses so you don't look a fool after this goes to court.
just say you take the "beans in the ears" defense.
pretending great powers strummed this up is so lame.
the simple version is better, because
its waaay more realistic. trump thinks he is above the law.


Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38279 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:37 am to
quote:

either that or trump mishandled sci materials he had no right to move 1 inch no less leave in boxes other people had access too.
nothing about that is acceptable. stop making excuses so you don't look a fool after this goes to court.
just say you take the "beans in the ears" defense.
pretending great powers strummed this up is so lame.
the simple version is better, because
its waaay more realistic. trump thinks he is above the law.

Now do Hillary
Posted by rphtx
CO
Member since Apr 2018
1568 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I know it’s difficult for you redneck Trumpkins to understand.

Btw, don’t we come up with the best nicknames for you sheep?

As I was saying , before you interrupted me for the umptenth time, Trump had nuclear documents that are 100% classified and was going to share them with his BFF Putin.

He pocketed donations from his Stop the Steal campaign and bought protection for himself and his family as they give our secrets with Russia.

He needs to be in jail for everything he has done.

Charlottesville, Covid, Mara largo golf when he’s suppose to be working, impeachment x2 and if that wasn’t enough he incited an “erection” on January 6th.

He’s racist, fascist, transphobic, xenophobic, overdress fish, gets two scoops and is a fat McDonald’s loving bigot that would sell us out to the highest bidder. We’ve NEVER had a president that had such serious foreign interference and obvious multiple deals with foreign nations to enrich himself and his corrupt family.

I hope you election deniers wake up and realize Biden is having to clean up all Trump’s mess like the economy and judges and has us roaring back to pre Trump times.


If you’ve read this far, kudos and Trump 2024


Nice alternate reality you livin in my man
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35863 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:44 am to
Don’t you prog filth ever tire from being wrong all the time?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52092 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 7:55 am to
quote:

That Trump was/is such a known security risk that it was a risk to extend him that courtesy says nothing about Biden and everything about your God-King.


So, just trying to follow your logic:

The same people who tried to impeach him, twice, have determined he’s “too much of a security risk” to extend the curtesy of security briefs that every other former president received?

Well, even though everything else they tried failed, it HAS to be true that he’s this much of a security risk. I mean, the Biden administration says so.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 8:01 am
Posted by 20 ton
BR
Member since Aug 2013
948 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Beans in the ears


Your the one that refuses to hear the truth.

Charlottesville. Lie
Pee tape Lie
Steele dossier. Lie.

Where are the phones that contain important documents

Bounties. Lie
Russian disinformation Lie

Read the transcript of Flynn’s conversation with the Russian ambassador. Explain why I should trust anyone that admits they bypassed normal conventions in an attempt to entrap him in a lie.

You are giving the benefit of the doubt to people that have proven the don’t deserve it.
Posted by delta_zulu
Middle TN
Member since Jul 2021
716 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 8:22 am to
quote:

either that or trump mishandled sci materials he had no right to move 1 inch no less leave in boxes other people had access too.


This is patently false. Trump did not pack up these materials. Trump’s people did not pack it either. GSA packed and shipped the docs.

Breitbart
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36551 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 8:31 am to
The “truth” usually ends up being what the loudest and whiniest mouths break free from the pack and say/parrot. And we all know which group those belong to. But I sense a major shift in thinking amongst the peoples. The loudest and whiniest are going to lose their “voice” in the next few months and well beyond. And I feel no compassion whatsoever for the loud and whiny leftists, they had every chance to turn it around for themselves.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13695 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Joe Biden ceased giving briefs to President Trump. This action was done as a prelude to the raid on Mar-a-Lago. All part of the effort to hang the bogus charge the former President is somehow engaged in espionage or selling top secret information to the Ruskies or whomever. Just another dumbass Mickey Mouse effort by the Cabal to stop Donald J. Trump. One corrupt determined bunch these Biden operatives.


This is correct. Trump told the world that he declassified the documents. Obama waited until Biden was sworn in, then had him stop giving Trump intel briefings. By doing this, he nullified the SCIF at Mar-A-Lago. He changed the playing field.

Now, they can say whatever they want, and they have- archive stuff, nuclear codes, nuclear secrets, etc… Notice how the narrative changed. They were trying to see what would outrage the public. As it turns out, not much did.

The real reason for the raid is to get the documents back that incriminate themselves.
Posted by lizlady68
Norwalk
Member since Jan 2022
274 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 2:28 pm to
Wow your really a brainwashed sheeple
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 2:29 pm to
Only difference....none of those former presidents are named trump
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
13787 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 2:32 pm to
Wager on a conviction then?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37329 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Those screaming the loudest that Trump had this or that, which the National Archives KNEW about for months, if not longer, are oddly oblivious to the fact that Hillary not only took but also DESTROYED documents that belonged to the State Dept.

She was never President. It was NEVER her call to be able to decide which docs to destroy, delete or transmit via unsecured home server.


If Trump committed a crime, Hillary committed mass murder.

These "destroyed" documents you are talking about are e-mail chains that were recovered because there were other officials copied on the same documents. They were marked as classified after the fact by nature of the emails themselves, which is little excuse.

And YES, Hillary should have been prosecuted because even concealing government documents is a violation of the FOIA laws.

So yes, she should have been prosecuted, and what Trump did is worse since he stole documents which contained defense and government secrets and actively tried to conceal / keep them from the government for over a year. We still don't know if everything was recovered.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47530 posts
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:02 pm to
Hillary hid state communications on a secret server, then destroyed evidence under subpoena. She then hired her cohorts as attorneys so they couldn’t testify against her, and that’s somehow better than a former president still having his own papers, classified under law, in a secure location, vetted by feds, who he is actively working with to transfer to the national archives just as Obama did?

Are you retarded?
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram