- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you hope Trump starts a new party?
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:00 am to SG_Geaux
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:00 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
Sadly a new party will mean the Dems win every election
What we have now means the marxists win every election that matters. They have the formula, and nobody is doing a damn thing about having their right to choose their representation taken from them. It's downhill from here, folks. Maybe some will wake up when Oklahoma or Alabama goes blue, but by then it will be too late.
0
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:05 am to ApexTiger
Yes. Blow the whole thing up.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:11 am to ApexTiger
A third party would guarantee perpetual minority status like there was for 40 years before Rush Limbaugh and Newt wrested control from the Democrats.
Stupid, stupid frickers.
Stupid, stupid frickers.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:15 am to ApexTiger
YESSSSSS
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:15 am to KiwiHead
quote:
before Rush Limbaugh and Newt wrested control from the Democrats.
LOL. Try Ronald Reagan.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:28 am to troyt37
Reagan only got the Senate. Tip O'Neill and the Democrats had the House. Then Reagan lost the Senate in 1986
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:28 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Do you hope Trump starts a new party?
Yes. The GOPe is wholly corrupt and dying. They'd rather be the minority, bitching and pretending to care while they continue to vote to send hundreds of billions of our dollars to Ukraine to be laundered back into their pockets.
The GOPe are controlled opposition.
A viable third party would fail at first. The establishment has all the money. But it would draw the Uniparty GOPe stooges right out into the open to be exposed once and for all.
Maybe after a couple election cycles, a third party would be formidable. Maybe not. But I'd rather go down supporting an "America First" party, than watch the continuation of America's slow "death-by-a-thousand-cuts" self-termination via a "two party system" that is ultimately one party with one goal, that does NOT align with We the People.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:36 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Reagan only got the Senate. Tip O'Neill and the Democrats had the House. Then Reagan lost the Senate in 1986
Reagan winning in 1980 is the only reason there even was a republican party in 1986. The party had gone the way of the Whigs, and were completely irrelevant, and apparently some people liked it that way.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I got news for you. MAGA will fizzle out before 2024. Most of you will turn on Donald by then. He's already melting down and spiraling toward obsolescence.
I got news for you. We’re not going anywhere & we will take the GOP down with us if that’s what it takes
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:42 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
I got news for you. We’re not going anywhere & we will take the GOP down with us if that’s what it takes
Spoken like a child
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:43 am to Havoc
quote:
No. That’s EXACTLY what They want.
No. They want to purge MAGA. MAGA can’t defeat the Uniparty but we can fracture those fckrs by taking the GOP down with us.
This post was edited on 11/15/22 at 9:44 am
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:45 am to ApexTiger
Nothing would make McConnell happier.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:49 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Yes. The GOPe is wholly corrupt and dying. They'd rather be the minority, bitching and pretending to care while they continue to vote to send hundreds of billions of our dollars to Ukraine to be laundered back into their pockets. The GOPe are controlled opposition. A viable third party would fail at first. The establishment has all the money. But it would draw the Uniparty GOPe stooges right out into the open to be exposed once and for all. Maybe after a couple election cycles, a third party would be formidable. Maybe not. But I'd rather go down supporting an "America First" party, than watch the continuation of America's slow "death-by-a-thousand-cuts" self-termination via a "two party system" that is ultimately one party with one goal, that does NOT align with We the People.
^^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^^^
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:49 am to KiwiHead
quote:
A third party would guarantee perpetual minority status like there was for 40 years before Rush Limbaugh and Newt wrested control from the Democrats.
Stupid, stupid frickers.
there must be a way to hold the other two accountable
We are stuck with them remaining in power
we are screwed if we don't blow it up
The democrats are very unified and taking us down a dark path of no return...playing big daddy government with an open checkbook
The GOP is a bunch of old dogs with no backbone, no plan, no nothing, just worthless IMHO
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:50 am to MRF
quote:
Nothing would make McConnell happier.
Eventually these old farts die
just sayin...
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:54 am to ApexTiger
No. Unless he loses the primary. Then yes.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:56 am to ApexTiger
It will be the toughest path to follow, but at this point with the state of the GOP and election manipulation let it fricking burn..
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:37 am to ApexTiger
It would not be the first time a former President started his own party to run again.
Theodore Roosevelt did in 1912. He could have ran again 1908, but chose to help his friend William Howard Taft get elected in 1908. He did not like the the way Taft was running the country, so he ran against him in 1912 and lost in the primary. Then started his own party which helped the Democrat Woodrow Wilson win in the general.
If Trump ran and lost in the primary he would do the same
Theodore Roosevelt did in 1912. He could have ran again 1908, but chose to help his friend William Howard Taft get elected in 1908. He did not like the the way Taft was running the country, so he ran against him in 1912 and lost in the primary. Then started his own party which helped the Democrat Woodrow Wilson win in the general.
If Trump ran and lost in the primary he would do the same
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:42 am to ApexTiger
No. Trump isn’t the right person to do this.
We could strengthen some established caucuses in the party. Use the GOP like a host to spread a disease of freedom.
The Marxists have been very effective on the other side in co-opting the Democratic Party.
It does require lasting effort over decades. So it won’t be popular.
We could strengthen some established caucuses in the party. Use the GOP like a host to spread a disease of freedom.
The Marxists have been very effective on the other side in co-opting the Democratic Party.
It does require lasting effort over decades. So it won’t be popular.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:47 am to the808bass
If Trump can't have it
he wants to burn it down.
That's what you signed up for ....bring smores
he wants to burn it down.
That's what you signed up for ....bring smores
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News