- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do people still believe that WTC 7 was NOT a planned demolition?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:34 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:34 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep.
Or you could just get an engineering degree.
I'm not even making a claim about WTC7, I'm just telling you that in a design like that if you lose a floor, buckling will be your failure mode. And buckling doesn't happen gradually.
1
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:40 pm to GumboPot
Good grief, this is so stupid.
The dag gum architect of the buildings was trying to call the police and tell them the buildings were going to collapse just like they did, based on their design!!!!!!!
The dag gum architect of the buildings was trying to call the police and tell them the buildings were going to collapse just like they did, based on their design!!!!!!!
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:42 pm to Flats
quote:
Or you could just get an engineering degree.
I have a couple of degrees and one is in engineering. I've been practicing over 25 years.
If you look at the video in the OP the evidence outlined is presented by many experts in the field of structural, mechanical, and civil engineering, material science, general physics, chemistry, etc.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:46 pm to GumboPot
Opinions are ok not not facts.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Here’s my question: why did they blow it up? The motive I don’t understand
For insurance money and to hide incriminating information.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:47 pm to jeffsdad
quote:
buildings were going to collapse just like they did, based on their design!
I need to put that as a slogan on my firms street sign.
"We design buildings to your collapsing standards."
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:47 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Immigration was in the towers
fast forward to today
fast forward to today
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:More sillinesss. It doesn’t matter how many columns you have. They still fail by fracture (hint:they are in compression). Also you need to consider load paths. If one column fails, the two adjacent columns become overloaded. Then they fail. Now four columns are overloaded. The. they fail, and you have 16 overloaded columns. Not to mention the amount of overload grows worth the square, too.
One column? Sure. Two simultaneously? Doubtful. 81 columns? Impossible.
quote:Than you should know better, and must be trolling.
I write this while literally doing structural engineering right now.
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:49 pm to themunch
quote:
Opinions are ok not not facts.
Fact: thermite dust was found all over the WTC site by private individuals and the USGS.
What the hell is thematic material doing at the WTC site?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:53 pm to GumboPot
I do not follow what the assertion is here? We blew up an additional building because the towers had been hit?
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 9/11/24 at 12:56 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:Ignorant people are the easiest to manipulate. Classic Dunning-Krueger . You don’t know isht about basic structures, but it’s not going to stop you from forming an option about with complete certainty.
Your explanation isn't more convincing than the information and videos posted and linked in this thread.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:00 pm to GumboPot
quote:This is too stupid to debate. Why not say “why don’t they use 757s to knock down the Calcasieu Marine tower i. Lake Charles last weekend?”
Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:00 pm to GumboPot
Bldg 7 doesn't fit the narrative.
So if you believe building 7's sympathy collapse, you can believe it all.
If you don't believe building 7, you can't also believe the official narrative.
That's why building 7 is ignored and left to the dust bin of history by the MSM....if it doesn't fit....the whole story collapses.
So if you believe building 7's sympathy collapse, you can believe it all.
If you don't believe building 7, you can't also believe the official narrative.
That's why building 7 is ignored and left to the dust bin of history by the MSM....if it doesn't fit....the whole story collapses.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:01 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
More sillinesss. It doesn’t matter how many columns you have. They still fail by fracture (hint:they are in compression). Also you need to consider load paths. If one column fails, the two adjacent columns become overloaded. Then they fail. Now four columns are overloaded. The. they fail, and you have 16 overloaded columns. Not to mention the amount of overload grows worth the square, too.
Good story but zero math to back it up. I've showed you a picture of an adjacent building that was more damaged than Building 7. It did not free fall collapse. It behaved like you would expect. Terrible damage where free falling debris hit, terrible damage from fire but in area where there was no falling debris or fire, it was still standing. I sure wish NIST would release their finite element model for peer review.
I understand the psychologic need to think that the collapse of Building 7 was not the result of a conspiracy other than falling debris form WTC 1 & 2. The thought of Building 7 coming down on purpose opens up rabbit holes that no one wants to go down. But for me the evidence is overwhelming that the free fall collapse of Building 7 is not the result of WTC 1&2 falling debris.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:02 pm to themunch
quote:
I do not follow what the assertion is here?
Do you know what thermite is?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:02 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep. It's apparently a novel, cheap and effective way to demolish structural steel buildings
Why not suggest the contractor that demo’ed the Calcasieu Marine tower in LC last week should have just flown 757s into it? quote:I refuse to believe you are this silly.
who would have thunk that a new business model for demolition contractors would have been born?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:Pleas tell me where you’ve worked on. I don’t want to go anywhere near it.
I have a couple of degrees and one is in engineering. I've been practicing over 25 years.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:04 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:quote:
Demolition contractors should just ignite abandoned office furniture and printing paper at the bottom of buildings to be demolished instead of using professional charges and months of building prep.
This is too stupid to debate.
Right. Because the narrative is Building 7 collapsed from falling WTC 1&2 debris and office furniture fire.
Pretty dumb, huh?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:06 pm to GumboPot
Thermite is commonly used in specialist welding applications
Like this?
Like this?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 1:06 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Good story but zero math to back it up
None required. I’m sorry you can’t do simple geometry or load paths. 
Page 4 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News