- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Diversity is our strength” - biggest lie ever told
Posted on 3/17/24 at 1:46 am to oklahogjr
Posted on 3/17/24 at 1:46 am to oklahogjr
quote:
diversity is a huge strength of this country.
The problem with this thread is that no one is defining "diversity."
You're defining it in your post as race (and to a lesser extend gender), and some other posters are as well.
I think the vast majority (even here) would agree that diversity of race is a non-factor. It's not important at all.
Even diversity of culture can work. The problem is when you have no shared culture and no shared values. You can differ on points A-B-C as long as you agree on X-Y-Z.
Our problem is that we've sold lots and lots of people on the idea that they need not conform to any aspect of mainstream culture anymore—that instead, mainstream culture needs to accomodate them, because "diversity."
(BTW, that's another problem with your post...you're mix the present and past tense, ignoring that our treatment of diversity of culture has changed over time.)
That's why first generation Korean and Chinese immigrants name their children Ann and Joe. They want them to fit in and they are willing to forgo their traditional heritage to make that happen.
Whereas black people who have lived in America for many generations name their children Toprameneesha and Quindavious (both actual names). They are demanding the right to resist mainstream culture and are, in fact, demanding that mainstream culture accomodate them.
Because Toprameneesha will definitely be the first to cry racism when her job application doesn't get selected for an interview (which it won't, research is clear on that).
Any time you see black people complain about someone "acting white" or express resentment over being asked to "act white," same thing.
This resistance of mainstream culture among that population is a recent phenomenon. Think about the notable figures throughout history: George Washington Carver, George Robert Carruthers, Hariett Tubman, Lewis Howard Latimere, Fredrick Douglas, Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Jessie Owens, James McCune Smith, etc., etc., etc. None of them were named Jondovious or Keeraesha (again, actual names).
That all came about as a result of the Black Muslims telling black people to ditch their "slave names" and resist mainstream American culture in the 60s.
The problem with that is that that movement was a (self-avowed) separatist movement, but the population it was aimed at never separated. Malcolm X literally preached that black people in America should leave and form their own country. Of course, he also preached that black people should adopt a set of values that held them to an even higher moral standard than mainstream America. The fact that they did neither of those things makes the whole resisting mainstream culture part obsolete and self-destructive.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:14 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Whereas black people who have lived in America for many generations name their children Toprameneesha and Quindavious
It’s because they’re really poor and they feel that their children have no no social value in the hierarchy. So they give them names that make them “special.” You see the same thing with poor white people too, although it’s not as as bad.
I’m not black, but I don’t think it’s about resisting mainline culture (I mean look at how toxic normal American culture is now) it’s because their social institutions collapsed. And they lost the ability to enforce healthy social norms.
quote:
Even diversity of culture can work
If you share the same culture with someone you can fairly reliably predict their behavior, because you understand the rules that govern them. And if you don’t understand the unspoken rules that your neighbors live by, then you’re going to put up walls and bunker down, which is what Putnam found.
We don’t really do well with any kind of cultural diversity. We evolved to live in small homogenous tribes.
This post was edited on 3/17/24 at 11:32 am
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:28 am to DyeHardDylan
Diversity the way the Dems see it is not our strength. They see value in other skin colors and cultures keeping their traditions and values intact and we should all just embrace it blindly and stay out of the way. That’s how culture wars start, conflicting values and very little actual common ground. It didn’t work with Native Americans which is why they savagely terrorized tribes with opposing values and traditions before the evil white man came and beat them at their own game.
Diversity of ideas CAN be a strength especially if they’re not all dumb ideas. It is good to have people on your team who think differently and have a different perspective. Unfortunately the Democrats do not see it that way.
Diversity of ideas CAN be a strength especially if they’re not all dumb ideas. It is good to have people on your team who think differently and have a different perspective. Unfortunately the Democrats do not see it that way.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:28 am to DyeHardDylan
Yes, and no.
Diversity can be strengthening so long as the "contributions" of the "diverse" are willingly integrated into the already existing cultural framework. When it is forced (diversity solely for diversity's sake) it weakens (and can ultimately destroy) that culture.
Diversity can be strengthening so long as the "contributions" of the "diverse" are willingly integrated into the already existing cultural framework. When it is forced (diversity solely for diversity's sake) it weakens (and can ultimately destroy) that culture.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:30 am to udtiger
quote:
Diversity can be strengthening so long as the "contributions" of the "diverse" are willingly integrated into the already existing cultural framework.
I understand the emotional point, but I’ve never seen anyone make a factual argument to prove it
Putnams research showed that it was just a negative. No upside.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:33 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
understand the emotional point, but I’ve never seen anyone make a factual argument to prove it
Putnams research showed that it was just a negative. No upside
I would submit the USA through the 1950s is proof.
The cultural contributions of all the ethnic groups to that point had been integrated into the American culture (blacks, Italians, Irish, Germans, etc.). It was only when cultural Marxists started fighting against assimilation of immigrants and forced cultural changes (as opposed to natural evolution) that "diversity" became a net negative.
This post was edited on 3/17/24 at 11:34 am
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:38 am to udtiger
quote:
I would submit the USA through the 1950s is proof.
America was very homogenous then. People lived in communities with people almost exactly like them. And this was true even on the regional level, whole swaths of the country were English or German. We of course had Irish and Italian populations, to pick two, but they lived in ethnic enclaves where they took care of each other. And our ruling class had roots going back to the earliest settlers.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:47 am to alumiknotty
quote:
Because in that same speech he called me and half the country extremist racist threats to the country.
I mean y’all did try to attack our seat of government
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:49 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
quote:
Because in that same speech he called me and half the country extremist racist threats to the country.
I mean y’all did try to attack our seat of government
You're an idiot.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 12:53 pm to udtiger
Why thanks
But I’m not the one melting over what Biden said when he said the truth
But I’m not the one melting over what Biden said when he said the truth
Posted on 3/17/24 at 1:00 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:Diversity is a strength as long as the effort is toward American cohesion rather than division.
“Diversity is our strength”
Posted on 3/17/24 at 1:38 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Why thanks
But I’m not the one melting over what Biden said when he said the truth
If those people truly wished to "attack the seat of power," they would have come armed, and they would have succeeded.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 8:37 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
It’s because they’re really poor and they feel that their children have no no social value in the hierarchy. So they give them names that make them “special.”
Except that it's not just poor black people who give their children names like that.
quote:
I’m not black, but I don’t think it’s about resisting mainline culture
We'll have to agree to disagree. I cited historical and (although anecdotal, fairly common, I think) evidence to support my viewpoint. What is informing your opposite opinion?
quote:
If you share the same culture with someone you can fairly reliably predict their behavior, because you understand the rules that govern them.
Which is why I said cultural diversity CAN work, IF you still share some common values.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 8:38 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
I mean y’all did try to attack our seat of government
By taking selfies?
I know the country has gone mighty soft, but damn...
Posted on 3/17/24 at 9:08 pm to DyeHardDylan
Diversity is a weakness.
Unity is a strength.
Unity is a strength.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 9:17 pm to wackatimesthree
in the 1985 period, team work was the desired work enviorment, with a well structured engagement to use input from all persons involved in the work process. Tecniques were taught to bring out the shy contributors and reign in the overbearing. Lots of work process mapping to identify redundancies. Who your mother was or standing to pee was never an issue.
Diversity is the exact opposite of team work. There is no coherent implementation process, it is all focused on people identities. Every company that accepts diversity as key aspiration is destined to become less competitive and on the road to bankruptcy.
Government jobs have no competitive output and are allowed to incorporate meaningless baggage.
Diversity is the exact opposite of team work. There is no coherent implementation process, it is all focused on people identities. Every company that accepts diversity as key aspiration is destined to become less competitive and on the road to bankruptcy.
Government jobs have no competitive output and are allowed to incorporate meaningless baggage.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 9:22 pm to DyeHardDylan
When you fly on a plane, is it more important that they hire the most qualified pilots or the most diverse ?
Diversity programs are a race to the bottom. It only benefits the less qualified. It does nothing for productivity.
Diversity programs are a race to the bottom. It only benefits the less qualified. It does nothing for productivity.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 9:24 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
I mean y’all did try to attack our seat of government
When did this happen? I think I would have heard about half the country attacking the seat of government.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 9:25 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Except that it's not just poor black people who give their children names like that.
My next sentence was
quote:
You see the same thing with poor white people too, although it’s not as as bad.
quote:
Which is why I said cultural diversity CAN work, IF you still share some common values.
Trust decays the further two populations are from each other culturally. By that logic, the most ideal scenario is no diversity. And diversity should generally be minimized.
Popular
Back to top


1





