- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Seth Rich Download DNC data on thumb-drive before his murder & FBI has 2 Seth laptops?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:26 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:26 am to cajunangelle
Ask Julian Assange, see the Wikileaks info.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:30 am to NC_Tigah
We have the email communications of the GRU sending DNC files to Wikileaks (or at least a link to the files). I’m really not sure what else you need.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 8:33 am
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:39 am to Decatur
quote:
his lady is a well-known Kremlin sympathizer
No Decatur, I'm extremely familiar with Katrina. I've actually met her a couple of times. Bright woman, and very compitent defending her beliefs ... which probably make yours look conservative.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:43 am to Decatur
quote:You're repeating yourself with a non sequitur. That isn't like you.
We have the email communications of the GRU sending DNC files to Wikileaks
Posted on 12/20/22 at 8:49 am to NC_Tigah
Yeah I’m having to repeat myself a bunch. I posted all of this info several times before. Weird to see people ignore direct evidence of the GRU giving the emails to Wikileaks but people seem to hold tight to their pet conspiracy theories.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 9:30 am to Decatur
quote:I have the same misgiving about your consideration of someone like Adam Schiff as credible.
Weird to see people ignore direct evidence of the GRU giving the emails to Wikileaks but people seem to hold tight to their pet conspiracy theories.
Nonetheless, your single source here is a journalist who mischaracterizes actual experts as "uncritical reporters" while passing himself off as an expert. He claims to "debunk" the timestamp and data download speeds, while disregarding opinions of actual experts on the topic. He drew some "conclusions" in the Computer Weekly piece that make no sense at all, and others seemingly drawn out of thin air, with zero backing evidence. e.g., the file manipulation occurred in September just prior to the London Conference.
Is there an actual expert software/code analyst or team who you can cite, because Campbell is none of those? If there is, I'd happily take a look. If not, your contention of the metadata as a hoax simply lacks merit.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 9:32 am to Decatur
quote:
Weird to see people ignore direct evidence of the GRU giving the emails to Wikileaks
From the link to Larry Johnson that Bunk Moreland provided.
quote:
An examination of the Guccifer 2.0 documents shows that the meta data in the Guccifer 2.0 documents were manipulated deliberately to plant Russian fignerprints. This was not an accident nor an oversight due to carelessness by some computer operator.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller is correct in stating that Guccifer 2.0 was a “fictious online persona. ” But he is wrong to claim that Guccifer 2.0 was a creation of the Russian Military Intelligence. Guccifer 2.0 appears to be a creation of the CIA and was one character in a broader scheme assembled to paint Donald Trump as a lackey of Vladimir Putin.
I remember this info from the time but, this is a good review of where it stood, before time passed and allowed mis/dis-information to do it's thing.
It's in the Meta data.
LINK Again
Posted on 12/20/22 at 9:47 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
your consideration of someone like Adam Schiff as credible.
Litmus test for downs syndrome.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 9:49 am to Decatur
quote:
Is that Nation article that you had to link to on an archived site hosted in the Philippines even available on The Nation’s website anymore. Did they pull it? Looks like it.
The Nation
Posted on 12/20/22 at 9:55 am to NC_Tigah
Ok looks like they moved the link to archive. The link I had was 404’d.
The updated article looks like they had to walk back their reporting a bit.
The updated article looks like they had to walk back their reporting a bit.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 10:00 am
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:13 am to NC_Tigah
This is from that VIPS report that the Nation article was drawn from.
July 5 post dates the date the DNC got hacked via a DCCC VPN (April 18, 2016). It even post dates Crowdstrike kicking Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear out of the DNC’s system (prior to June 14, 2016). The hack already happened. The Forensicator stuff is obvious nonsense. I mean the guy’s alias should be a dead giveaway by itself.
quote:
The Key Event July 5, 2016: In the early evening, Eastern Daylight Time, someone working in the EDT time zone with a computer directly connected to the DNC server or DNC Local Area Network, copied 1,976 MegaBytes of data in 87 seconds onto an external storage device. That speed is much faster than what is physically possible with a hack.
July 5 post dates the date the DNC got hacked via a DCCC VPN (April 18, 2016). It even post dates Crowdstrike kicking Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear out of the DNC’s system (prior to June 14, 2016). The hack already happened. The Forensicator stuff is obvious nonsense. I mean the guy’s alias should be a dead giveaway by itself.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:21 am to Decatur
quote:
This is from that VIPS report that the Nation article was drawn from.
Every time you get owned by NC, you create new paths for your naivety.
You'll keep trying to convince yourself this is benign.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:26 am to cajunangelle
Didnt Julian Assange basically "out" Seth Rich as the source while not specifically naming him as the source.
I remember Assange putting out a press release that said something akin to, We take the privacy and safety of our sources seriously, and in the same release put out a 100K reward for any info regarding Seth Rich's death?
I remember Assange putting out a press release that said something akin to, We take the privacy and safety of our sources seriously, and in the same release put out a 100K reward for any info regarding Seth Rich's death?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:27 am to cajunangelle
Seth Rich worked in IT for the DNC. The data he got most likely would be from VM backups (snapshots) taken of the databse. Easily transferrable to an external SSD drive that fit into one's palm.
Knowing his job description worked with Data, it would have been easy for him to transfer these things around.
This was no outside hack. Those kinds of transfers would have gotten noticed.
Knowing his job description worked with Data, it would have been easy for him to transfer these things around.
This was no outside hack. Those kinds of transfers would have gotten noticed.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You'll keep trying to convince yourself this is benign.
That's not really what he's doing.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:30 am to riccoar
quote:
This was no outside hack. Those kinds of transfers would have gotten noticed.
Yep.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:31 am to Decatur
quote:
Will y’all please finally go read the section on this in Mueller’s report?
Why is the Mueller report unbiased and believable? ARe we supposed to ignore everything we've learned about the FBI the last 2 weeks, and just take their word for it that they weren't one-sided corrupt treasonous assholes for many years?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:31 am to Decatur
quote:
We have the email communications of the GRU sending DNC files to Wikileaks (
No we don't, you fricking clown.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:56 am to riccoar
quote:
The data he got most likely would be from VM backups (snapshots) taken of the databse. Easily transferrable to an external SSD drive that fit into one's palm.
Ok first off, zero evidence for any of this.
Second, are you really arguing that this kid provided DNC emails to Wikileaks in addition to the GRU providing the emails to Wikileaks. Because there is proof of the latter. Not a very strong hypothesis IMO.
Popular
Back to top


0




