- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dianne Feinstein, 90, cedes POA to daughter but still serves in Congress
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:31 pm to thermal9221
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:31 pm to thermal9221
quote:
Lol yeah because she’s a corpse.
The perfect Senator for California.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:37 pm to troyt37
quote:Troy, both Mickey and I addressed the issue presented in the OP. It is you and Roger who are arguing beyond the scope of the OP.
The disconnect is Hanky and you apparently want to have a discussion about irrelevant shite, instead of talking about mentally deficient geriatrics running the country.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:38 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is you and Roger who are arguing beyond the scope of the OP.
Because we got past page one. You didnt.
Shes lost it, she cannot function.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:39 pm to troyt37
quote:No, Troy, it is not. You are thinking of an NCM declaration.
Given the fact that there is more than ample evidence That Feinstein is in fact incapable of handling her own, or anyone else's business, isn't that precisely what the POA means?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Roger, it is you who is trying to take a point that we addressed on page 1 and pretend that it is somehow relevant to the broader question of her general competency ... a broader point on which both Mickey and I have said we generally agree with you.quote:Because we got past page one. You didnt.
It is you and Roger who are arguing beyond the scope of the OP.
It is just weird.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:41 pm to EKG
She looks like Robert the Bruce's dad in that picture
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:45 pm to saints5021
quote:
No one should be defending Feinstein, Biden or Strom Thurmond making decisions on our behalf.
They are great examples of why the system so heavily favors the incumbent.
I'd throw Don Young in there too. Dude was in cognitive decline 15 years before he died.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, Troy, it is not. You are thinking of an NCM declaration.
Would you hire her to handle your affairs? No? Then it is, isn’t it?
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:49 pm to troyt37
quote:
Would you hire her to handle your affairs?
I wouldn't even put her on speakerphone to Ukranian businessmen to get her 10%.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:54 pm to pankReb
quote:
No longer has the capacity to control things in her own life.
If she was incompetent, she would not be able to execute a power of attorney.
Hank have explained it accurately. Powers of Attorney are a delegation, an appointment, not an interdiction. The person who signs a power of attorney does not lose any power and can revoke the delegation as quickly as it is granted.
Some have asked why would anyone do this? There are a million reasons. When my kids went to college, I had them sign powers of attorney in favor of me so that I could pay bills for them and if they needed medical treatment and were unable to consent, I could do it. When over 18, powers of attorney are generally required. My wife and I have standing powers of attorney. I hold power of attorney for my father, who is totally competent. When we closed on our home my wife was out of the country. The closing attorney required a special power of attorney. When you purchase a car from a dealer you execute a power of attorney that allows the dealer to file the registration on your behalf.
Powers of attorney are for contingencies and planning. The mere execution of a power of attorney means nothing by itself.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 12:55 pm to troyt37
Signing a POA means nothing relative to competency. I agree that she appears incompetent and personally think she should resign. But Hank is right that the initial idea was flawed.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:24 pm to AggieHank86
Hank,
I believe that is completely about losing mental acuity given the vote taken this past week in the Senate where she was told to say "Aye", and then she went on a speech, and was told to say "Aye" two more times, looked very confused and finally said "Aye".
I believe that is completely about losing mental acuity given the vote taken this past week in the Senate where she was told to say "Aye", and then she went on a speech, and was told to say "Aye" two more times, looked very confused and finally said "Aye".
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:24 pm to dinosaur
quote:
Signing a POA means nothing relative to competency. I agree that she appears incompetent and personally think she should resign. But Hank is right that the initial idea was flawed.
The initial idea isn’t flawed when Stevie Wonder can see that she is terribly mentally deficient.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:27 pm to troyt37
quote:No, Troy, it is not.
Would you hire her to handle your affairs? No? Then it is, isn’t it?
Look, you don't understand the concept of a Power of Attorney. That is fine. You are a layperson, and you aren't necessarily expected to have that understanding.
But you are ignoring a half-dozen lawyers telling you that you are wrong. That is just intentional ignorance.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:30 pm to Friscodog
quote:As both Mickey and I have said at least a half-dozen times, she is definitely in decline. Hell, she may even be NCM.
I believe that is completely about losing mental acuity given the vote taken this past week in the Senate where she was told to say "Aye", and then she went on a speech, and was told to say "Aye" two more times, looked very confused and finally said "Aye"
But execution of a PoA in favor or her daughter does NOT establish NCM status, as alleged in the OP.
Why is anyone still arguing this point? It has been explained again and again, and not just by me.
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:34 pm to troyt37
quote:
The initial idea isn’t flawed when Stevie Wonder can see that she is terribly mentally deficient.
yessir, do not need anything signed to tell me that woman has major cognitive decline.
She represents her constituents very well.
This post was edited on 8/4/23 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, Troy, it is not. Look, you don't understand the concept of a Power of Attorney. That is fine. You are a layperson, and you aren't necessarily expected to have that understanding. But you are ignoring a half-dozen lawyers telling you that you are wrong. That is just intentional ignorance.
I understand it just fine, douchebag. Incapacity to handle your affairs take on quite the other definition when you have displayed that you have bats in the belfry. Apparently it’s your job and others here to play up the too busy part, and downplay or ignore the crazy as a shithouse rat part.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 1:47 pm to LSURussian
quote:
My wife and I gave POA to each other over 25 years ago. It doesn't mean we are incapable of making decisions for ourselves.
I don't understand the point of the article or this thread over POA.
DiFi is less mentally capable than Joe. She had to be told how to vote the other day.
No one 90 years old should be in Congress.
Popular
Back to top


0





