- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Details on Trump's Thursday Night Address to the Nation
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
Her actual releases were specific to 2016 and Russia Gate. They showed specific and detailed evidence of the plot to impeach Trump including emails and intelligence outlines.
No one on the left cared. No one in the DOJ has done anything about it.
You are correct that she alluded to but did not actually release the 2020 evidence.
The left wont care about that either, only a relatively small group of independents and the right who already believe that election fraud occurred.
No one on the left cared. No one in the DOJ has done anything about it.
You are correct that she alluded to but did not actually release the 2020 evidence.
The left wont care about that either, only a relatively small group of independents and the right who already believe that election fraud occurred.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:18 am to Rhames
quote:
It’s going to be about Iran.
LINK
That would be quite a dud if that press release from 2021 is the topic. Has something new been uncovered recently?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:18 am to tide06
quote:
Her actual releases were specific to 2016 and Russia Gate. They showed specific and detailed evidence of the plot to impeach Trump including emails and intelligence outlines.
No one on the left cared. No one in the DOJ has done anything about it.
She released documents that weren't really able to connect the dots in the way the Q crowd promised, and they keep overselling the value (like you ITT)
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:20 am to tide06
So Toto is about to pull back the the curtain
And either trump will look pretty bad if he doesn’t have the goods and is all bark or he has the goods and SHTF
what could go wrong 
And either trump will look pretty bad if he doesn’t have the goods and is all bark or he has the goods and SHTF
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:22 am to tide06
quote:
Her actual releases were specific to 2016 and Russia Gate. They showed specific and detailed evidence of the plot to impeach Trump including emails and intelligence outlines.
It was a weak nothingburger more akin to the inner workings of the deliberative process moreso than “a plot to impeach” Trump.
You guys are just so starved for anything that you oversold the shite out of it and expect the rest of us, who can also read, to follow along with you.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:22 am to jb4
It's being reported he's releasing information about Iran, which has significance generally but none towards basically every 2020 CT
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:23 am to Squawk7600
quote:
That would be quite a dud if that press release from 2021 is the topic. Has something new been uncovered recently?
Be prepared for a dud.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:25 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
You guys are just so starved for anything that you oversold the shite out of it and expect the rest of us, who can also read, to follow along with you.
Dead on.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:29 am to RustyDaDog
I don’t think he’s giving the speech thinking he’s going to change anyone’s mind.
Think harder.
Think harder.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:32 am to Squawk7600
quote:
That would be quite a dud if that press release from 2021 is the topic. Has something new been uncovered recently?
There has been stuff that’s been going on, especially in Georgia due to their elections, but I don’t see Trump going on TV to talk about this stuff before any legal action comes.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:34 am to tide06
quote:
Her actual releases were specific to 2016 and Russia Gate. They showed specific and detailed evidence of the plot to impeach Trump including emails and intelligence outlines.
No one on the left cared. No one in the DOJ has done anything about it.
You are correct that she alluded to but did not actually release the 2020 evidence.
The left wont care about that either, only a relatively small group of independents and the right who already believe that election fraud occurred.
All ^^^^ true.
I hope Trump speaks about the rise and danger of Democratic Socialism/Marxism and his strategy to pushback against the enemies from within.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's being reported he's releasing information about Iran, which has significance generally but none towards basically every 2020 CT
It’s going to be a hard needle to thread that:
2016 election, which Obama was in charge of security of, was legit as Trump won. Any suggestion of Russian meddling/interference is literally treason.
2020 election, which Trump was in charge of security of, was a fraud free-for-all, both by domestic and foreign actors, and this is the only reason Trump lost.
2024 election, which that bumbling idiot Biden was in charge of security of, was legitimate and resulted in the most resounding, clean victory of all time for Daddy.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 10:44 am
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:45 am to boosiebadazz
The Iran evidence tracks with the "Russian interference" evidence in 2016
I want to see the Q posts about Iran's interference specifically before the initial report was released (years ago).
I want to see the Q posts about Iran's interference specifically before the initial report was released (years ago).
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Do you mean the "Russian interference" that you wholeheartedly believed was legit?
Also, what specifically are you asking about in regards to the Q drops? I haven't caught up on the thread yet. Jumped to the last post.
Also, what specifically are you asking about in regards to the Q drops? I haven't caught up on the thread yet. Jumped to the last post.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:07 am to MoarKilometers
If you don't recognize that as a joke you're even dumber than I thought. Which is bad.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:07 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
It’s going to be a hard needle to thread that: 2016 election, which Obama was in charge of security of, was legit as Trump won. Any suggestion of Russian meddling/interference is literally treason. 2020 election, which Trump was in charge of security of, was a fraud free-for-all, both by domestic and foreign actors, and this is the only reason Trump lost. 2024 election, which that bumbling idiot Biden was in charge of security of, was legitimate and resulted in the most resounding, clean victory of all time for Daddy.
This is where I’m lost at. Mail in voting was taken advantage of in 2020, and there’s really nothing Trump could have done because of state laws, but that’s not the same as hacked voting machines. It does support the need for the SAVE Act. What’s frustrating is that it discredits the push to get it passed when prominent supporters would rather shite post and chase ghosts then focus on the real issues of election security.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:17 am to BoarEd
The Dems’ entire defense is that Trump told Maduro he’d let him off easy if he confesses to something that’s not true.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:19 am to BoarEd
quote:
Do you mean the "Russian interference" that you wholeheartedly believed was legit?
This doesn't exist.
I called out the silly muh Russia CTs like I call out the silly Qtard CTs.
You either being wrong on the facts or lying is on brand, though.
quote:
Also, what specifically are you asking about in regards to the Q drops?
I'm asking for Q drops that specifically link Iran that pre-date the public release of this Iran stuff (which happened a few years ago). I don't think any exist.
What I imagine is going to happen is a lot of true believers are going to try to dishonestly claim this information about Iran somehow supports Q nonsense or muh steal claims, when it doesn't seem to have any overlap with either. So I'm asking for the evidence ahead of time.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:20 am to lionward2014
quote:
What’s frustrating is that it discredits the push to get it passed when prominent supporters would rather shite post and chase ghosts then focus on the real issues of election security.
What I've been trying to explain to the conspiratorially-minded for years
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What I imagine is going to happen is a lot of true believers are going to try to dishonestly claim this information about Iran somehow supports Q nonsense or muh steal claims, when it doesn't seem to have any overlap with either. So I'm asking for the evidence ahead of time.
Well that is unlikely to happen because, to the best of my knowledge, Q doesn't link Iran specifically to 2020 election interference. Most of the Iran drops are dealing with the Uranium 1 treason.
As for the rest, who says that this Iranian influence thing they just brought forward is ALL he's going to talk about? It seems doubtful to me that he would trot out the DNI, the CIA director, and the FBI director to talk about an online influencer campaign.
Speaking of going on record, how about you go on record for us right now that you think that this speech will only be about this Iranian indictment.
Popular
Back to top


4







