- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Destigmatizing Drug Use Has Been a Profound Mistake
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:44 am
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:44 am
clown world
Destigmatizing Drug Use Has Been a Profound Mistake
The image on the billboard that appeared in downtown San Francisco in early 2020 would have been familiar to anyone who’d ever seen a beer commercial: Attractive young people laughing and smiling as they shared a carefree high. But the intoxicant being celebrated was fentanyl, not beer. “Do it with friends,” the billboard advised, so as to reduce the risks of overdose.
The advertising campaign was part of an ongoing national effort by activists and health officials to destigmatize hard-drug use on the theory that doing so would lessen its harms. Particularly in blue cities and states, that idea is having a moment. The general message carried by the San Francisco billboard appeared as well in the New York City health department’s “Let’s Talk Fentanyl” campaign, which last year told subway riders, “Don’t be ashamed you are using, be empowered that you are using safely,” and further counseled them to “start with a small dose and go slowly.”
The nationally influential Drug Policy Alliance goes further: It lauds many fentanyl dealers as “harm reductionists” who should be respected and left alone by authorities (because the arrest of a trusted dealer might cause users to seek the drug from an unfamiliar source). A prominent subset of academics provides intellectual support for these initiatives, theorizing that stigma against drug use is ethically wrong and also worsens public health.
LINK
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:46 am to djmed
we've destigmatized all sorts of destructive behavior. Out of wedlock sex, divorce, drug use, sexual depravity, etc...
its destroying society.
its destroying society.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 9:48 am
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:49 am to djmed
Destigmatize throwing drugdealers from helicopters.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:50 am to Vacherie Saint
America was founded on Judeo-Christian values. We’ve abandoned that foundation is pursuit of personal pleasure and the system is collapsing.
Times change. Technology changes. People don’t.
If you’ve read the Bible, the Jewish people stepped on the same rake over and over again. It’s the same rake we are stepping on now.

Times change. Technology changes. People don’t.
If you’ve read the Bible, the Jewish people stepped on the same rake over and over again. It’s the same rake we are stepping on now.

Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:50 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
we've destigmatized all sorts of destructive behavior. Out of wedlock sex, divorce, drug use, sexual depravity, etc...
its destroying society.
Have you considered that's intentional?
Guys like Ted Turner advocated for a one-child policy like 10 years ago.
You think the elites want more people? No, they want you dead and gone or, at minimum, living in a pod and eating bugs while they laugh and dine on the best meats.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:53 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
You think the elites want more people? No, they want you dead and gone or, at minimum, living in a pod and eating bugs while they laugh and dine on the best meats.
more people = more $$ to buy shite = more $$ for rich people
why would the rich want to kill off their customers?
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:55 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
why would the rich want to kill off their customers?
Social utopians.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:56 am to djmed
Destigmatizing sounds like a new word for the term 'Law as teacher' which we used in discussing drug legalization in the 1960s.
The argument went like this:
"If drugs should be legal based on a person's right to assume risk then people will misread the legalization into thinking that drug use is healthy (otherwise why would the govt make it legal)."
It was a tough argument to counter since so many people trust the govt as all knowing. We saw this with the Covid vaccine. People assumed it great stuff because the govt told them it was.
The argument went like this:
"If drugs should be legal based on a person's right to assume risk then people will misread the legalization into thinking that drug use is healthy (otherwise why would the govt make it legal)."
It was a tough argument to counter since so many people trust the govt as all knowing. We saw this with the Covid vaccine. People assumed it great stuff because the govt told them it was.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:57 am to djmed
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:57 am to djmed
quote:
A prominent subset of academics provides intellectual support for these initiatives, theorizing that stigma against drug use is ethically wrong and also worsens public health.
You mean like the ones plagiarizing thesis statements and testifying open support of terrorist organizations?
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:14 am to djmed
quote:
Destigmatizing Drug Use Has Been a Profound Mistake

Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:16 am to djmed
Drug dealer = Harm Reductionist
Wow! Dems have a way of wording things!
Wow! Dems have a way of wording things!
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:17 am to djmed
I was all on the libertarian "if people want to use drugs let them" bandwagon
Then places like Portland did it and they are wastelands of zombie junkies
I don't agree with it anymore.
Then places like Portland did it and they are wastelands of zombie junkies
I don't agree with it anymore.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:18 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
more people = more $$ to buy shite = more $$ for rich people
why would the rich want to kill off their customers?
How many people work for the government or produce next to nothing?
They don't want you as the middle man to their power/riches and even if they came up with some world changing technologies they wouldn't trust the normies to use it as they want. You're a net negative to their existence.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:18 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
we've destigmatized all sorts of destructive behavior. Out of wedlock sex, divorce, drug use, sexual depravity, etc... its destroying society.
Yep. And the devil is laughing at our stupidity
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:19 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
why would the rich want to kill off their customers?
The people calling the shots are transhumanists. It’s not me saying so, they write books and give interviews about it.
Research it and it’ll make more sense, but think of it less as a business model and more of a pseudo religion.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:20 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
How many people work for the government or produce next to nothing?
They don't want you as the middle man to their power/riches and even if they came up with some world changing technologies they wouldn't trust the normies to use it as they want. You're a net negative to their existence.
was just saying that people are consumers and if there are less people then you have less consumers, less economic activity across the board
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:20 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I was all on the libertarian "if people want to use drugs let them" bandwagon
I still am. But I have never been on the de-stigmatize bandwagon. I believe in stigmatizing the frick out of them.
I'm more of a "let them die out" type.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:23 am to djmed
Honestly not sure if it has been destigmatized, even though it's become legal in many states.
Popular
Back to top

17









