- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DeSantis looks to be easing out of a '24 run
Posted on 4/10/23 at 12:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/10/23 at 12:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The same data that requires you to allege every Patriot loss was due to voter fraud?
No it does not. What it does is give an opposite choice and stand our ground.
I'm not interested in a win at any cost. you have seen it through out this thread and others. We are done with the name above the door labels.
John McCain was no more conservative than Ted Kennedy. He had the opportunity to put down ACA and he told the GOP voters... F uck you!
Paul Ryan.. the same thing.
We ar literally done with the Name Above the Door means GOOD... It doesn't.
0
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Falsification of business records is a misdemeanor for which the statute of limitations has run out. So they need to link it to the intent to commit "another crime" in order to move it up to a felony, for which the statute of limitations hasn't run out.
And what is that crime according to the filing? "Identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral prospects."
How is that a crime? Notice how they don't cite what law or statute that is supposed to have broken.
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:04 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Falsification of business records is a misdemeanor for which the statute of limitations has run out. So they need to link it to the intent to commit "another crime" in order to move it up to a felony, for which the statute of limitations hasn't run out.
OK cool, but each indictment is Falsifying business records in the first degree, which is a felony. The misdemeanor would just be Falsifying business records. They're 2 different statutes.
*ETA: all 34 charges are felonies. Your prior post is wrong
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:06 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
VoxDawg
Man, this guy hides behind a mask. BUT.. keep posting facts that everybody can see.
Seriously, it's the only way to open eyes.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:09 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Name one other potential Republican nominee that can fight as well as trump.
And campaign infrastructure to pull off a solid fight.
Not even the GOP has the campaign infrastructure that Trump has.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:10 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Man, this guy hides behind a mask. BUT.. keep posting facts that everybody can see.
Seriously, it's the only way to open eyes.
To reality?
He disputed that Trump was charged with 34 felonies.
I posted the actual indictment and law, showing he's charged with, in fact, 34 felonies.
This is not something that's in dispute with people living in reality.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:17 pm to BBONDS25
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The same data that requires you to allege every Patriot loss was due to voter fraud?
Being unable to see the harvesting and fraud is willful ignorance. It’s noted though.
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:19 pm to rmnldr
Yes, they are.
They are scared of Trump because they can't control him. He also knows 100% how they manipulated 2020 and he 100% knows everyone behind Russia Collusion.
They think they can control Ron, but I'm not convinced he's flipped Neo-Con, but they believe they can manuever him like they did Trump somewhat in 2016 because he would be so new and have to rely pn people to instruct him on things.
Donald knows where he was led wrong and I imagine he's told Ron too.
They are scared shitless of Trump
They are scared of Trump because they can't control him. He also knows 100% how they manipulated 2020 and he 100% knows everyone behind Russia Collusion.
They think they can control Ron, but I'm not convinced he's flipped Neo-Con, but they believe they can manuever him like they did Trump somewhat in 2016 because he would be so new and have to rely pn people to instruct him on things.
Donald knows where he was led wrong and I imagine he's told Ron too.
They are scared shitless of Trump
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're deliberately ignoring the circuitous route they chose to make the case for these being felonies. I'll stipulate to their being felonies if they're all predicated on the DA reaching around his arse to scratch his nose.
Ray Charles can see what these crooked frickers are up to, but by all means, continue to wallow in your willful ignorance to the situation.
Ray Charles can see what these crooked frickers are up to, but by all means, continue to wallow in your willful ignorance to the situation.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To reality?
No no. You show who you are with all your posts.
- Yet another thread today where you 100% refused to answer the effects of "FREE TRADE" with a communist nation. You can't because it hurts your whole narrative.
- your passive aggressive attack on this topi without answering says it all.
quote:
He disputed that Trump was charged with 34 felonies.
Nope. He disputed that they are accurate.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:29 pm to riccoar
quote:
They are scared shitless of Trump
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:31 pm to moneyg
quote:
Being unable to see the harvesting and fraud is willful ignorance
I was trying to warn this very board about ballot harvesting in 2020. It's not always illegal or fraudulent, though.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:32 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
The more you all demand we are, the more you strengthen our resolve. We are America First. We were here before Trump. All you do is harden us just like the term "Deplorables".
I don’t even know what you are talking about. I said nothing about any of that.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:33 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
You're deliberately ignoring the circuitous route they chose to make the case for these being felonies
No I'm stating a fact.
He is indicted for 34 felonies. That is a fact. I posted the indictment for you to read.
quote:
Ray Charles can see what these crooked frickers are up to, but by all means, continue to wallow in your willful ignorance to the situation.
What is this craziness?
I've never said this is a strong case. Be that as it may, Trump is indicted on, and charged with 34 felonies. He entered a plea of not guilty to all of them. That is reality and where we're at. Now he can file a motion to dismiss to test out your theory and see if it works.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:34 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Nope. He disputed that they are accurate.
His words:
quote:
No, there are 34 charges, one of which is a felony
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:35 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Notice how they don't cite what law or statute that is supposed to have broken.
NY law doesn’t require them to specify the underlying crime that elevates the falsification charge to a felony in the indictment.
Obviously they would have to show it at any trial.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:35 pm to RobbBobb
It’s probably the best thing for DeSantis to do for his political future. If he were to run against Trump, Trump will try to tear him down and would probably win this go around. Even if DeSantis won, people who are only-Trump probably would not vote for DeSantis, or if Trump ran as an independent he would take votes from DeSantis. Might as well avoid that damage now.
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
The more you all demand we are, the more you strengthen our resolve. We are America First. We were here before Trump. All you do is harden us just like the term "Deplorables".
I don’t even know what you are talking about. I said nothing about any of that.
In th past you have though. I did, however, acknowledge that this was not your current argument.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 1:37 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
In th past you have though. I did, however, acknowledge that this was not your current argument.
Right. So instead of responding in this thread, to the comments I made in this thread, you just randomly decided to talk about something else entirely?
Par for the course I suppose.
Eta: I’ve also never called anyone Deplorables. You seem to forget that I voted for Donald Trump twice, and will do so again if he’s the nominee.
I castigate the always-Trump wing of the party because you guys cannot understand that people who do not think exactly like you are needed to win elections.
Your preferred strategy of “frick them” was fun in 2015 and worked 2015-2017. It stopped working after that. The voting base has to expand, or Trump will lose again in 2024.
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 1:40 pm
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News