re: Derek Chauvin seriously injured in knife attack in prison

quote:

---

This is such a dumb take.

---

It’s an old joke.

If by any chance some are surprised by this - even disappointed - obviously haven't had the distinct honor of having experienced the cultural enrichment that comes with listening to our local stations WBOK and WYLD.

Have had an urge to turn it on about this story, but am not interested in hearing them whoopin' and hollerin' over it like banshees.

It would be the same if something similar happened to Trump.

Talk about a load of academic social theories that we've been pounded with by the propaganda mills, government, and media that have always been tenuously held, but now are on the verge of going by the wayside.

Way too late for "we-told-you-so's."

If anyone for what ever reason doesn't believe that there's a slowly developing attitude among cops to just let them do what ever they want.

"We'll just show up later, put crime scene tape around the site, give it an Item Number, fill out a report, and wait for the next one."

Again, WBOK and WYLD for the woefully naive.


We're at a time when it makes more sense to protect oneself anyway.

quote:

---

t does not mean then that every jury gets every case wrong.

---

NO!
It means every jury does not get it right.

You cited the jury verdict as if it spoke definitively to the underlying truths of the Floyd case.

quote:

---

You cited the jury verdict as if it spoke definitively to the underlying truths of the Floyd case.

---

… says the user who cited the jury verdict of OJ Simpson as if it spoke definitively to the bias of the Derek Chauvin jury.

quote:

---

So taking the opinion of a Forensic Pathologist for the Mayo Clinic over some random user on a LSU sports message board is now a “contradiction to science or fact in this forum”.

---

No.
We are talking about your posts, not whose opinions you "take."

Did "a Forensic Pathologist for the Mayo Clinic" cite a TDF study relative to the Floyd case?

No?

Yet you did. That is the sort of thing we're addressing.

quote:

---

… says the user who cited the jury verdict of OJ Simpson as if it spoke definitively to the bias of the Derek Chauvin jury.

---

You're struggling here, but I'd bet you're starting to get it. :wink:

TIL that an article from Reuters is a TDF study. That’s news to me!

Are you referring to where I stated it was an irrefutable fact that Derek Chauvin is a convicted murderer and that a jury of Mr. Chauvin’s peers found beyond a reasonable doubt that Derek Chauvin murdered George Floydd?

I would LOVE to see your argument for how either of those could possibly not be true.

quote:

---

I would LOVE to see your argument for how either of those could possibly not be true.

---

So you're not bright enough to understand people aren't arguing that those are the facts of the matter, they're arguing that the justice system isn't infallible and this was an extremely unique case where politics was heavily involved.

Or, you are that bright, but don't want people bringing that up because you'd rather them just accept your stance on this issue.

quote:

---

they're arguing that the justice system isn't infallible and this was an extremely unique case where politics was heavily involved.

---

Of course it isn't infallible. I'm just wondering what's got you so hot and bothered with Chauvin. I bet you didn't have any sympathy for Ray Hinton. An innocent man who sat on death row in Alabama for over 30 years. The arresting officer told him "maybe you didn't do it, so just consider it taking one for your bro". He was railroaded at every turn and the state refused compensation when he was exonerated. Why do you have so much love for government agents?