Started By
Message

re: Denmark Stood By the U.S. in Afghanistan - Is This How We Repay Them?

Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23915 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Is This How We Repay Them?

Yes*


*There’s been talk of buying Greenland if that can be considered repayment.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Perhaps it is YOU that don’t understand what the term “requirement” means.

And you get too much of your news from Twitter. The difference between what Denmark spends and what the NATO “requirements” are is effectively a platoon of leopard tanks and an extra F35 or two.

Besides, they met the 2% requirement in 2025.

The whole point is that making Denmark out to be a mooching taker is just dumb.

There are actual targets for that. Germany is by far the biggest offender and it’s not close.

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

We owe them nothing.

They likewise owe us nothing.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44276 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Besides, they met the 2% requirement in 2025.


For the first time in a decade.



quote:

The difference between what Denmark spends and what the NATO “requirements” are is effectively a platoon of leopard tanks and an extra F35 or two.


So 20 F35s?

Seems sizable.

quote:

Germany is by far the biggest offender and it’s not close.


And?


This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 8:00 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:01 pm to
We told them to do it. They did it. Denmark has pretty much always done so within the confines of NATO. They are not and have never been the issue with funding or maintaining their own forces.

Again, what’s the problem with the Danes? We have every possible avenue to do whatever we want in Greenland already. But you’re just mad because they won’t sell it to us?
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25267 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:01 pm to
Denmark is the size of Maryland, and about 7 million people.....
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

So 20 F35s?

No, I said a platoon of leopards or a couple F35’s just looking at the numbers. The difference for Denmark is not much money at all. It costs us more to build a destroyer. That extra .4% is inconsequential for NATO’s capabilities. They already punch above their weight in air power—with F35’s they bought from us.

quote:

And?

You’re parroting talking points from Twitter without any thought or knowledge of the situation.
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 8:05 pm
Posted by UcobiaA
The Gump
Member since Nov 2010
4255 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

We’ve been subsidizing the defense of NATO and the EU for several decades


It sure is a lot easier for them to have all those generous social programs when Uncle Sugar guarantees their countries safefy.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44276 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:19 pm to
A decade = ten years.

A couple of F35’s x 10 = 20.

That is sizable.

Now imagine the rest of Europe doing the same.

As I previously posted - freeloaders.

Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177321 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile Iran, Russia, and China are sitting back laughing.


Yeah I'm sure Russia is laughing over the US potentially acquiring Greenland

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122852 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:24 pm to
His expertise is more in the realm of slip and falls and sending his clients to strip mall doctors
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44276 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

You’re parroting talking points from Twitter without any thought or knowledge of the situation.


Your ignorance concerning me is stunning.

1. I’m not a Twitter guy.

2. I am quite knowledgeable on the matter.

3. I was clear in my posts.

I have stated it before, and I will state it again…I don’t trust Europe. Much like Canada, they have been in bed with China. They are still in bed with China, just not to the degree that they were since the U.S. (Trump) called them out.

When the ONLY reason that you stop colluding with the enemy of your friend is because you were called out, then you are probably a shite friend.

Then again, a friend that continually mooches off of you is a shite friend.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44276 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Are you suggesting that Russia would randomly target Copenhagen with missiles?



No.

Just for clarity though, Kaliningrad has more than just missiles. It is pretty much a forward base for Russia.

quote:

Because there’s not anything Denmark can do about that.


That’s what happens when you bail on your responsibilities.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

That’s what happens when you bail on your responsibilities.

Notice that you omitted the part of the quote where I said there’s nothing we could do about it either.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

I have stated it before, and I will state it again…I don’t trust Europe. Much like Canada, they have been in bed with China. They are still in bed with China, just not to the degree that they were since the U.S. (Trump) called them out. When the ONLY reason that you stop colluding with the enemy of your friend is because you were called out, then you are probably a shite friend. Then again, a friend that continually mooches off of you is a shite friend.



NONE of those entities have been “in bed” with China to a level that even comes close to the level that the United States is in bed with China.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Yeah I'm sure Russia is laughing over the US potentially acquiring Greenland

The United States has had complete and total military access to Greenland since 1951
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10654 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:40 pm to
What the frick does that have to do with today?
Posted by LoveOfTheGame1
Member since Jan 2015
45 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:16 pm to
I'd like you to just Google 'forced sterilization US'
Posted by MississippiTigerGirl
Brookhaven, MS
Member since Sep 2007
609 posts
Posted on 1/19/26 at 2:56 am to
Yes. This how.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27182 posts
Posted on 1/19/26 at 5:07 am to
quote:

Because there’s not anything Denmark can do about that. There’s nothing we could do about that either FWIW—not with hypersonics from that distance


Providing the threat of retaliation deters military action. That is how we protect NATO countries. Why the hell do all you communist think Ukraine want to get into NATO!!!
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram