- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems gonna try to convict Hegseth of war crimes?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:16 pm to PurpleCrush
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:16 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Media brings it to the attention, the Administration is to provide answers.
Bruh...
1
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:17 pm to BBONDS25
Dude, I, I, I just can't
You are unreal
You are unreal
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:17 pm to loogaroo
Purple drank lol
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:19 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Dems gonna try to convict Hegseth of war crimes?
They absolutely will if they can. They want him in prison. They also want Trump in prison. If they gain control of congress, they will be one step closer. Meanwhile the fricking GOP house can't even censure Omar or a fellow Dem Rep who was literally texting Jeffrey Epstein as she dictated his questions in a committee...
Getting a GOP house who could work with POTUS was the most important thing to the whole deal and so far they haven't done shite.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:20 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I hope he is blameless here
What would be the offense? Because if so, somebody then would have the blame. Blame for what? There haven't been any boat exploded in a few days. Maybe the powers that be are working out what to do with survivors if our missiles don't work 100%.
But then again, if it is alright to kill the boat people why is it bad if they survive and we have to re-kill them? Would it be cruel to leave them to die with third degree burns and holes in their bodies?
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:23 pm to Jbird
The MSM has been caught over and over again trying to start these sort of hit pieces with no consequences except for a retraction on the last page three months later.
They want Pete gone badly.
They want Pete gone badly.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I am a grown man viewing the World like a pragmatic with like experience. You view it like an intellectual child who fancies himself a “true patriot”. They were engaged in illegal activities that put the lives of hundreds or thousands of Americans at risk each day and the World is better off without them. If you want to argue about the process to which they met their maker, then knock yourself out. That doesn’t make you magically correct or morally superior. It does make you a naive fool
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:33 pm to loogaroo
Indeed.
They cheered Obama droning a wedding.
They cheered Obama droning a wedding.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:33 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
They were engaged in illegal activities that put the lives of hundreds or thousands of Americans at risk each day and the World is better off without them.
Sounds like what the Texas Rangers did so long ago.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:34 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
They were engaged in illegal activities that put the lives of hundreds or thousands of Americans at risk each day and the World is better off without them
Thats how liberals see the world. The addict is the victim.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Yes you are the “true” conservative yet you continue to find yourself on the side of Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jefferies. Why is that Rog?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:45 pm to cajunangelle
Thanks for posting this Angelle. I think it gets the military off the hook.
"Our mission was to DESTROY the boat, not to disable it. It took four shots to do that. The fact that some terrorists survived the first shot is immaterial. We still took the 3rd and 4th shots.
If ALL of the terrorists had survived the boat being destroyed, we would have rendered assistance. That didn't happen."
It might be difficult to square that policy with the fact that a submarine was disabled the next month, and the two surviving crew members were rescued. BUT the military gets to define its mission.
I think that will probably work....
"Our mission was to DESTROY the boat, not to disable it. It took four shots to do that. The fact that some terrorists survived the first shot is immaterial. We still took the 3rd and 4th shots.
If ALL of the terrorists had survived the boat being destroyed, we would have rendered assistance. That didn't happen."
It might be difficult to square that policy with the fact that a submarine was disabled the next month, and the two surviving crew members were rescued. BUT the military gets to define its mission.
I think that will probably work....
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I’m asking what you think the standard should be. It’s a simple question. Are you good with the standard being an unsourced allegation from the media?
You think Sen Wicker and Rep Rogers, open investigations just based on media reports? Ok, that is funny. Grid all you want, oversite is Congress' obligation.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:50 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Decatur's recent find of two strikes AFTER the survivors were killed---if true---gives the military a viable out of "our subsequent strikes were to destroy the vessel, not to kill survivors."
I agree and said as much as soon as he posted it. However, I don’t trust unnamed sources…and that is all Decatur or anyone can come up with at this point.
It’s like the Russia collusion stuff. The media smells blood in the water and all of a sudden there are all these unnamed sources. Fool me once…
Now if we get some real sources I would love to know what happened.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:52 pm to Bama Mountain
Umm yeah Roger Wicker is one of the biggest Rinos in the Senate, how did you not know this?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:54 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Thanks for posting this Angelle. I think it gets the military off the hook. "Our mission was to DESTROY the boat, not to disable it. It took four shots to do that. The fact that some terrorists survived the first shot is immaterial. We still took the 3rd and 4th shots.
If what you posted about FTOs, use of force, etc is accurate (and it appears to be) then all of the strikes are unlawful. Double tapping survivors would be particularly heinous, but all of the strikes would be unlawful.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:57 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
You think Sen Wicker and Rep Rogers, open investigations just based on media reports?
If they are investigating this at this point, it is entirely based upon media reports.
quote:
oversite is Congress' obligation.
Love it. Let’s get newsmax and oan to make some allegations and let the investigations begin!!
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:57 pm to Decatur
You got them Rexcatur!
Well done!
Well done!
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:58 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
You are unreal
You think we are targeting fishermen. You’re not the brightest bulb.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News