- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dems, forgetting rest of it for a moment, can you at least admit this is unacceptable
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:20 pm
Especially read subpart a
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:21 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Their personal biases are really the least important detail in the whole thing IMO
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Maybe. But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Yeah, little known law that only people who like you are allowed to investigate you.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:24 pm to a want
quote:
But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
well sure
but that hasn't been established in any way, shape, or form
said by a person who never supported Trump
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:24 pm to Salmon
quote:
Their personal biases are really the least important detail in the whole thing IMO
Not really; goes to motive
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I am a never Trumper but above all i am an American .
Actions that were described in the memo are un american and people need to go to jail.
Actions that were described in the memo are un american and people need to go to jail.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:25 pm to a want
Funny how people investigating criminals don’t like those criminals eh?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:26 pm to a want
What a disturbing comment.
We live in a democracy.
It isn’t up to you—or anyone else—to decide, on behalf of an entire nation, who should be president.
We live in a democracy.
It isn’t up to you—or anyone else—to decide, on behalf of an entire nation, who should be president.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:26 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
'our findings indicate'
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:26 pm to Salmon
quote:
Their personal biases are really the least important detail in the whole thing IMO
This one million times. I don’t care what their political biases were. Where does the objective evidence lead?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:27 pm to a want
quote:
if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
Change "him" to "her" and stick your post where the sun don't shine, puto.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but that hasn't been established in any way, shape, or form
Oh weird, you mean the thing that the investigation is investigating hasn’t been established yet?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I don't give a shite about personal biases, but yes that appears to be a legitimate conflict of interest. A Deputy AG whose wife is working for a firm doing opposition research against an individual shouldn't be anywhere near that individual's case.
*If everything presented there is materially accurate.
*If everything presented there is materially accurate.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:29 pm to a want
Three politicians
a.) Told Russia "he'd have more flexibility" after the election
b.) Sold massive amounts of uranium to Russia
c.) Had a son meet with a Russian lawyer about oppo research that was never used
WHich would you say would lead to collusion?
a.) Told Russia "he'd have more flexibility" after the election
b.) Sold massive amounts of uranium to Russia
c.) Had a son meet with a Russian lawyer about oppo research that was never used
WHich would you say would lead to collusion?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:31 pm to Navytiger74
The memo is no doubt disturbing
For the people saying biases don't matter, of course they do
The investigation is going nowhere. Mueller is going to ring up some dudes on relatively minor shite, and the end result is going to be the same as it was months ago:
Russia tried and succeeded in creating chaos in our electoral politics
AND
Trump didn't really play any active role in Russia's efforts in that regard
AND
Trump has a competency issue, or did, because he associated with some terrible people (but that's the extent of it)
For the people saying biases don't matter, of course they do
The investigation is going nowhere. Mueller is going to ring up some dudes on relatively minor shite, and the end result is going to be the same as it was months ago:
Russia tried and succeeded in creating chaos in our electoral politics
AND
Trump didn't really play any active role in Russia's efforts in that regard
AND
Trump has a competency issue, or did, because he associated with some terrible people (but that's the extent of it)
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:32 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
We get to see who does not give a shite about the rule of law as an added bonus!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:32 pm to a want
quote:
But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
You can't be THIS F*CKING STUPID.
The Russia bullshite was made up. This was the "insurance policy". The only "collusion" you Dims can point to is the meeting with Don, Jr. That meeting was set up by GPS Fusion to try to frame Trump. It didn't work.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I loled when I read subpart a.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:34 pm to a want
I can't believe anyone can look at this I think it is acceptable or excusable in any way, shape, or form.
The DNC (not some rogue group) paid for false information on a political rival and then major elements of a DNC-led FBI and DOJ knowingly and intentional used that false information to (1) spy on an American citizen and (2) justify an investigation into that political rival.
Can anyone defend or excuse the above?
The DNC (not some rogue group) paid for false information on a political rival and then major elements of a DNC-led FBI and DOJ knowingly and intentional used that false information to (1) spy on an American citizen and (2) justify an investigation into that political rival.
Can anyone defend or excuse the above?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News