- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems, forgetting rest of it for a moment, can you at least admit this is unacceptable
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
its certainly not ideal, but calling it "clear evidence of Steeles bias" is actually clear evidence of bias. it doesnt mean the things he wrote about were false. you can be biased and honest at the same time. i dont like trump but im not gonna say he rapes children.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:36 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
The investigation is going nowhere.
Maybe...
quote:That's what they're trying to establish. Or at least what role he may have played in obscuring others' activities.
Trump didn't really play any active role in Russia's efforts in that regard
quote:Most cops, prosecutors, and probably even judges tend to have a low opinion of the kind of people who find their way into the system. So should we stop policing? Trying perps?
For the people saying biases don't matter, of course they do
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:39 pm to gthog61
quote:
We get to see who does not give a shite about the rule of law as an added bonus!

Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:39 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Most cops, prosecutors, and probably even judges tend to have a low opinion of the kind of people who find their way into the system. So should we stop policing? Trying perps?
Tell all that BS to a black American slick.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:40 pm to a want
quote:
Maybe. But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
WTF
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:42 pm to a want
quote:
a want
I don’t say this lightly.
You belong in a rubber room.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Most cops, prosecutors, and probably even judges tend to have a low opinion of the kind of people who find their way into the system. So should we stop policing? Trying perps?
Of course not. I'm not saying we fire Mueller. Let him finish. He needs to hurry up though.
But the truth is the investigation is going nowhere and every honest Democrat knows it. Some grand collusion with Russia doesn't even fit Trump's profile. You know it, I know it.
The bombshells are "you're on my team, right" and Hope Hicks maybe, possibly, saying something that could indicate obstruction when obstruction didn't actually happen.
The truth is that Russia sought to undermine our institutions. They wanted Trumpkins to decide the media was the enemy. They probably fed Steele ridiculous info that would be used against Trump associates. They wanted Americans to turn against our IC.
The additional truth is that they succeeded, and what's more, they didn't have to work too hard at it because all of it is, to some extent, true. The IC is a monstrous, liberty-sacrificing entity that prioritizes the institutional status quo and is scared of someone like Trump. Our media is incredibly slanted toward one ideological category.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:45 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Most cops, prosecutors, and probably even judges tend to have a low opinion of the kind of people who find their way into the system. So should we stop policing? Trying perps?
This is some weird rationalization.
It's apparently a tad more than bias. It appears more like #resist to me. Can I investigate you fairly when I would do anything to keep you from being President?
That's a tough question in this current climate.
Another distinction is that cops are biased against criminals.
This particular bias isn't about politicians. It's specific to Trump. That's a huge difference.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:46 pm to a want
quote:
But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians
You must know by now that didn't happen, right?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:47 pm to a want
quote:
Maybe. But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
How many countries did Hillary collude with via the Clinton Foundation money? Why was she not a threat to be used by a foreign country?
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:51 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/4/20 at 5:39 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:01 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
I can't believe anyone can look at this I think it is acceptable or excusable in any way, shape, or form.
The DNC (not some rogue group) paid for false information on a political rival and then major elements of a DNC-led FBI and DOJ knowingly and intentional used that false information to (1) spy on an American citizen and (2) justify an investigation into that political rival.
Can anyone defend or excuse the above?
I've been asking the same question. You won't get a response. Posters like a want and crew see nothing wrong with what occurred. Nothing at all. Why? Because it was against Trump and Republicans.
Everything is justified when it comes to smearing your political opponent.
The ends always, ALWAYS justify the means.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:22 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:god damn. i didnt even realize how deep the delusion went here. i thought people here just didnt care, but you think the entire thing is made-up, is that correct?
You must know by now that didn't happen, right?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:43 pm to MastrShake
quote:
i thought people here just didnt care, but you think the entire thing is made-up, is that correct?
There was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government - at least not based on any evidence that has been verified, beyond early leaks subsequently proven to be false.
Did Trump try to win the election? Certainly.
Did/does Russia try to influence our elections? Absolutely. Every time.
Did they coordinate? Nope.
You guys on the left can't possibly believe that Putin prefers a tough talking, "America first" populist to a irredeemably corrupt, easily buyable political opportunist, now do you?
Really?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:55 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
am a never Trumper but above all i am an American .
It's ok...come on over and join us. We can all win big for the next 7 years.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:57 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The wife of a high-ranking member of the AG's office was hired by an outfit contracted with the Hillary campaign and DNC for the sole purpose of compiling oppo research on Trump, then fed information they paid for to her husband to instigate the investigation of Trump.
That is so unacceptable.
That is so unacceptable.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:02 pm to a want
You and milkshake are clueless. McCabe said there would’ve been no FISA warrant if not for the Dossier which was not verified, and Comey even stated this.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:08 pm to a want
quote:So if some rep. guys start spying on the filthy liberal community it is o.k. with you.
a want
Lets say they would arrest and charge everyone of you trash that says anything bad about Trump charging them with threatening the president.
Still o.k., right?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:23 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
every honest Democrat knows it
uhhh, you mind pointing out who that might be?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:24 pm to a want
quote:
Maybe. But if I knew a presidential candidate had colluded with the Russians (and would subsequently be subject to blackmail) I wouldn't want him to be president either.
And there it is. EXACTLY as I predicted.
Liberals are about to convert from, "it's all a lie" to, "well of course they did it.......they SHOULD have done it!"
Popular
Back to top


0










