Started By
Message

re: Democrat bill to abolish DHS, fund universal mail-in voting remove deportation for voting

Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:34 am to
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
28367 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:34 am to
Conservatives should use their tactic of registering voters and collecting ballots in legitimate Conservative leaning churches.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173951 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:45 am to
The democrats are so insidious... They will conjure up masshoe bros screaming that DHS was formed by the evil Dubya, after 911. So close it down...

What govt tentacle is ICE under the auspice of? They probably have Thune sitting in his cuck chair waiting to watch them defund ICE...
Posted by Jack Daniel
Gold member
Member since Feb 2013
30119 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:49 am to
This will surely lower grocery prices
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173951 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

So once the kids are raped Demoncrats may require fingerprints.....or Demoncrats may just join in.
Exactly. It is tragically so sad. Only evil would then title it:"Child Safety Laws"

Even the most dense of the human intellect can see this, right?
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
79630 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:52 am to
quote:

The vast majority of the country is required to provide ID to vote.
Yeah that part right there is the issue. It should be everyone
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
79630 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Why not make ID verification universal?
Well that’s racist because of……. Reasons
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29439 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Why not make ID verification universal?


That shut that dumb bitch up immediately.

I wonder why...
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Why not make ID verification universal?
because it’s not the Federal government’s job.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:

I wonder why...

Me? I did my daughter’s hair and finished getting the kids ready for school.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
27521 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:11 am to
So big fed gov ok but not here making our elections more secure and taking the ability of either side to scream about elections is too much fed over reach?

I agree the fed gov should be staying in its very narrow lane but it hasn’t. So we could at least make elections secure with reasonable rules.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

That shut that dumb bitch up immediately.

Why are you so emotional? It’s interesting that anger and rage is bubbling so close to your surface that a stranger valuing small government causes you to lash out like this.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29439 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:12 am to
quote:

because it’s not the Federal government’s job.


But universal mail in ballots is?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:13 am to
quote:

So big fed gov ok but not here making our elections more secure and taking the ability of either side to scream about elections is too much fed over reach?
I know you think big government is good. I value actual limited government. That’s why I’m unpopular.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29439 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Why are you so emotional?


Not emotional. Just showing child grooming apologists the respect they deserve.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
27521 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:14 am to
Or perhaps we break the elections up and federal elections follow one set of rules all 50
States and then each state is free to run their state and local level elections as they see fit.

Federal should have very strict narrow rules considering what is at stake.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

But universal mail in ballots is?
didn’t trump sign an EO mandating special post office ballots or something? I can’t keep up with them all. Not sure what you’re talking about.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 8:15 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64492 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Just showing child grooming apologists the respect they deserve.
more evidence of your emotions controlling you
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
29377 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Not sure what you’re talking about.


Probably the info in the OP, which you apparently didn't read.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
27521 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:17 am to
No I’ve been very clear things would be much better if the federal gov was extremely limited. However both sides have decided when they control the fed gov it should trample states rights and they have bastardized a lot of stuff using way too broad interpretation.

I’d scale the federal gov way back and the states would have way more power other than being able to control immigration rules, enter treaties and such and the fed gov would maintain the military and interstate system and air travel.

However since we do have a federal government for the election of federal positions we should have standard rules everyone follows.

The states should then separately run their own elections as they see fit.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29439 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:

didn’t trump sign an EO mandating special post office ballots or something? I can’t keep up with them all. Not sure what you’re talking about.


Did I ask you about Trump's EOs or did I ask you whether you thought providing mail in ballots was the federal government's responsibility?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram