re: Declassified documents: Chinese manufacturing drivers licenses for mail in ballots

quote:

---

He would've been better served outing Georgia with solid, factual evidence

---

This is what we were promised by a certain population

Solomon admitting he had no evidence of votes being changed, etc. was just icing on the cake of that night

He also did the WE GOTTA READ THE DOCUMENTS NOW cope-defense

Update: the documents did not show evidence of any votes being changed, fraudulent votes, etc.

quote:

---

Important Caveats Noted in the Document: The document includes significant warnings and FBI commentary regarding the reliability of this information:

---

CBP CONFISCATED 19,888 PHYSICAL FAKE DRIVERS LICENSES

There is no question as to reliability of that fact.

There does seem to be a shell game afoot though.
There was a small seizure of similar licenses in Cincinnatti, which appeared to be solely for underage kids in TX, TN, OH. The Cincinnati CBP surmised those had been obtained by the students to buy booze.

The 20,000 IDs seized in Chicago (those we are discussing) were specifically (1) Not isolated to underage individuals, (2) Targeted swing states, (3) Targeted individuals who would not be otherwise eligible to vote in those states.

What is your theory as to the purpose of those IDs?
The problem I have is Wray offered no theory. Zip. He just tried to shut the entire thing down, and cover it up.

quote:

---

CBP CONFISCATED 19,888 PHYSICAL FAKE DRIVERS LICENSES

---

That has literally nothing to do with the documents referenced. You're forcing a conflation of two different data sets with no established relationship.

If you have direct, credible evidence to connect the two, feel free to present it for analysis.

quote:

---

That has literally nothing to do with the documents referenced.

---

IDK what documents you are referring to. It is directly related to suppressed evidence by Wray.

Get a job fagggot

quote:

---

Declassified documents: Chinese manufacturing drivers licenses for mail in ballots

---

quote:

---

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had said in July 2020 that “fraudulent driver’s licenses … continue to be found by CBP officers” at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. From January through June 2020, CBP said its officers had “seized 1,513 shipments with fraudulent documents — a total of 19,888 counterfeit US drivers’ licenses” and that “the majority of these shipments were arriving from China and Hong Kong.”
---

Wray appeared before the Senate Homeland Security Committee in late September 2020, where he was asked if voting by mail was secure.

“Well, senator, what I think I would say is this: we take all election-related threats seriously… and our role is to investigate the threat actors. Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it is by mail or otherwise,” Wray said. “Certainly to change a federal election outcome by mounting that kind of fraud at scale would be a major challenge for an adversary, but people should make no mistake, we're vigilant as to the threat and watching it carefully because we're in uncharted territory.”

The FBI director was asked if he was saying that he had not seen any widespread fraud by mail, and Wray vowed that “that’s something we would investigate seriously and aggressively.”

---

It is literally the report cited in the OP.

Notice Wray's deliberately slippery answers to the questions?

quote:

---

It is literally the report cited in the OP.

---

The declassified documents have no overlap with the CBP story.

There is a conflation going on

You quoted this language:

quote:

---

Important Caveats Noted in the Document: The document includes significant warnings and FBI commentary regarding the reliability of this information:

---

That language is exclusively about the declassified documents and has no relevance to the CBP story as the 2 are not related.

It’s pretty standard for law enforcement to include disclaimers like that to cover their arse. There could always be a link in the chain in which reliability can’t be assured. It doesn’t mean it isn’t true or even that there isn’t solid evidence of it and it certainly doesn’t discredit it on the whole. That’s what SFP does. He’ll hyper-focus on something on the periphery to muddy the waters.