Dave Rubin is one tolerant MFer. College SJW goes haywire on him...

Bitch be dumb.

It's easy to call him a bigot

Step 1) Only read tweet from SJW claiming he's a bigot

Step 2) Call him a bigot

Done deal.

Now if they actually WATCH him, that will create congitive dissonance which SJWs can't handle.

Feelings and all.

His knowledge of what specifically.

quote:

---

Rubin seems cool but his knowledge is rather cursory and elementary.

---

I like Rubin pretty well, but I agree with this. In the UNH event, he was wanting to be too nice, when he could have intellectually stepped on the throats of several of the SJWs in the audience. What could be called patience also could come across as weak.

This culture war cannot be lost. Not sure Rubin plays for keeps in ways guys like Molyneux do.

quote:

---

Rubin seems cool but his knowledge is rather cursory and elementary.

---

I don't think his role is that of a great thinker, but I think he is an excellent interviewer.

He has his views and can articulate them but I don't think I've listened to him and said "damn that was insightful".

But I've really enjoyed his conversations he's had with others on the Rubin Report.

That's a great video to show how deranged the Left is, but he needs a better response to her, "hate speech leads to violence" rhetoric. He's stating that unless speech is directly calling for immediate violence, then it's allowed. And Dave is absolutely right. However, she's trying to claim that all these Nazi rallies, where maybe the call to violence is not immediate, it will lead to violence and genocide eventually.


While the Supreme Court already addressed this:
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie


This basic nuance is lost on this crazy liberal.

What Dave needs to explain is that if a Nazi isn't allowed to speak in public, then they will recruit in secrecy, and suppression will lead to MORE violence against Jews.

While I don't agree with the premise that if a Nazi's speech should be repressed because the rhetoric eventually leads to violence against Jews, let's just assume I did. If I believed that, it wouldn't be speech limited to public arenas, as speaking in public has no added efficacy other than possibly a wider audience. The speaker doesn't only have the magic "inspiring Jewish genocide" powers in public, they would also have it in private. If someone is banned from speaking in public, they will just do it in private and there they will go unquestioned and the mainstream will be oblivious to it. Ultimately leading to more radicalization.

Suppression of the marketplace of ideas only emboldens and strengthens those ideas for the dimwitted.

The funniest part of the whole clip we're the faggies snapping their fingers when the girl was talking like her points were good.

She will learn to hate men more and more as they continue to avoid her like the plague.

The northeast and west coast is beyond repair. Anybody debating with anyone from these regions deserve the brainstew served up to them. Just move on.