- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:29 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
In what language does "I hear" equate to "I know", cuz it sure ain't English.
The level of specificity denotes knowledge.
The lack of objectivity here today is incredible.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:29 am to Bard
quote:
It was specific enough that it came from someone with first-hand knowledge.
Smoke much dope?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:31 am to Bard
quote:
The level of specificity denotes knowledge.
"word on the street there is going to be 2 more email drops"
OMG GET A ROPE! HE'S CLEARLY COMMITTING TREASON AND IS ON THE HORN WITH THE RUSKIES RIGHT NOW!
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:32 am
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:35 am to Bard
quote:
The level of specificity denotes knowledge.
The lack of objectivity here today is incredible.
I agree your objectivity is lacking.
So if you heard a rumor you didn't know was true and it turned out to be true you can be held to a standard that you did in fact know something was true at the time you heard the rumor?
Is this the crazy pants logic you are using?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:36 am to Jjdoc
These prosecutors cannot be serious. There are so many holes to this charge and none of this should even be the purview of the Special Counsel because none of this is criminal.
Whomever conducted this part of the investigation NEEDS to have his/her law license pulled
What Mueller is doing is hanging a perjury charge because he does not like the answers and the actual events do not line up with how he assumes they should.
Whomever conducted this part of the investigation NEEDS to have his/her law license pulled
What Mueller is doing is hanging a perjury charge because he does not like the answers and the actual events do not line up with how he assumes they should.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:36 am to CAD703X
quote:
"word on the street there is going to be 2 more email drops"
OMG GET A ROPE! HE'S CLEARLY COMMITTING TREASON AND IS ON THE HORN WITH THE RUSKIES RIGHT NOW!
Translation: Unless you agree that everything Mueller does is evil then you must be a raging liberal.
Keep painting with that wide brush, Ebbandflow would be proud.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:36 am to CAD703X
quote:
word on the street
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:38 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So if you heard a rumor you didn't know was true and it turned out to be true you can be held to a standard that you did in fact know something was true at the time you heard the rumor?
Is this the crazy pants logic you are using?
:Kige:
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:41 am to Bard
quote:
The level of specificity denotes knowledge.
Even if there was some knowledge, it means nothing. Corsi does not possess the emails and he's not an operator of WikiLeaks. The dump of the Hillary emails was the most uneventful least surprising surprise of the campaign. Assange had essentially announced that he had some of her emails and he had also intimated he had other stuff as well.
Corsi is essentially talking conjecture here and even if he is talking to Credico or the guy in London, it becomes nothing more than rumor , innuendo and conjecture
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:42 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So if you heard a rumor you didn't know was true and it turned out to be true you can be held to a standard that you did in fact know something was true at the time you heard the rumor?
The email does not appear to be speculation. "Word on the street" means "I don't want to name my source" and the information presented was specific.
But please, keep using the NPC "Orange Man Bad" tactics against anything Mueller, it comes across just as desperate.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:45 am to Bard
quote:
your lack of objectivity here today is incredible
His statements don't convey where the information came from. They don't point to any source. His source thread could be nothing more than the TD Q thread. His statements prove absolutely nothing and wouldn't be enough to convict him in any court in the land.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:52 am
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:45 am to Bunyan
quote:
"Bob" will go down as the biggest POS in American history BY FAR. I'm sure Democrats love this
Brennan was lionizing Honest Bob yesterday in his response to POTUS' tweets. That tells you everything you need to know.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:45 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Even if there was some knowledge, it means nothing. Corsi does not possess the emails and he's not an operator of WikiLeaks. The dump of the Hillary emails was the most uneventful least surprising surprise of the campaign. Assange had essentially announced that he had some of her emails and he had also intimated he had other stuff as well.
Corsi is essentially talking conjecture here and even if he is talking to Credico or the guy in London, it becomes nothing more than rumor , innuendo and conjecture
I agree with most of that, I just don't think it was conjecture. If it wasn't then he lied.
Thanks for having a level-headed response. The apoplexy here has been akin to something on DU.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:47 am to ItNeverRains
quote:no we havent.
We’ve spent 30 million dollars of taxpayer money on this.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:47 am to Bard
quote:
The email does not appear to be speculation. "Word on the street" means "I don't want to name my source" and the information presented was specific.
Or it could mean that he heard it and didn't like want to let people know it was some guy named Bard on a message board. You're filling in blanks that you have no information to fill in.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:47 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
His statements don't convey where the information came from. They don't point to any source. His source thread could be nothing more than the TD Q thread. His statements prove absolutely nothing and would be enough to convict him in any court in the land.
So he made it up?
People only use phrases like "word on the street" to mean "I don't want to reveal where I got this from".
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:48 am to Bard
quote:
Irrelevant when an investigator is asking "did you know about this before it happened".
If he heard a rumor, or was repeating water cooler talk, he didn't really "know" anything. C'mon. People don't go to jail for this. Aren't we supposed to be looking for Russian collusion, here rather than trying to squeeze people into incriminating the POTUS?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:50 am to Bard
quote:
Irrelevant when an investigator is asking "did you know about this before it happened".
That is the very description of a perjury trap.
That you defend it is sickening and sad.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:51 am to Bard
People make shite up all the time to feel self important. You can find 100 threads on the Tiger Rant every year with self important people 100% in the know.
That lone statement couldn't convict him of a single thing.
That lone statement couldn't convict him of a single thing.
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News