- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily Caller obtains Corsi plea agreement and it show the trap and mentality of Mueller
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:53 am to TigerMyth36
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:53 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
People make shite up all the time to feel self important
reference any height/weight or base salary threads on the OT.
0
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:56 am to Bard
quote:
That seems pretty clear-cut to me.
God gawd….from the party of "I guess that depends upon what the definition of 'IS" is"
And it also seems pretty clear that Hillary's campaign colluded with a foreign agent, who colluded with other Russian agents, which was fed into our intelligence agencies...
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:56 am to AUTiger1978
quote:
Or it could mean that he heard it and didn't like want to let people know it was some guy named Bard on a message board. You're filling in blanks that you have no information to fill in.
It could, but considering the circles Corsi moves in, that's highly doubtful. Regardless, he knew a dump was coming yet lied about knowing about it to investigators.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:57 am to Bard
quote:
He needed to access his emails to verify whether he knew something or not?
I assure you that you have a lot of information that you can not recall from 2 years ago! Especially if it revolved around gossip and rumors.
It is 100% impossible for you to recall every email you ever sent and remember them word for word.
At last count, at least 33 people in the world could tell you what they ate for breakfast, lunch and dinner, on February 20, 1998. Or who they talked to on October 28, 1986. Pick any date and they can pull from their memory the most prosaic details of that thin slice of their personal history.
Others, no doubt, have this remarkable ability, but so far only those 33 have been confirmed by scientific research.
It's called Hyperthymesia. Even people with Eidetic memory can't recall every detail on every day.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:59 am to Bard
You really are a hack to believe that. I mean 100% hack. That lone statement proves nothing and I do mean nothing. And I for one don't know the guy and couldn't care less about him going to jail. He just wouldn't be convicted by me on that lone statement.
Amazing how you clowns have gone from spending 6 years railing over the Patriot Act, but dead silent when Obama didn't repeal it, strengthened it and then weaponized the IRS and FBI to destroy political opponents.
Truly amazing.
Amazing how you clowns have gone from spending 6 years railing over the Patriot Act, but dead silent when Obama didn't repeal it, strengthened it and then weaponized the IRS and FBI to destroy political opponents.
Truly amazing.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:00 pm to Bard
The better question to ask, is why is Mueller going after noted clowns like Jerome Corsi and Roger Stone? These guys were nothing but b rated celebrities, at best, in the right wing media . Why waste time with this or the paper used to formulate the plea deal?
Why worry about being lied to about something that is not even a crime and to that extent, Mueller knows, this, even if true was not a crime. shite, given how he's using 18 USC 1001 if I decide to screw with an FBI agent and give him wrong directions to a place, I could get nailed
Why worry about being lied to about something that is not even a crime and to that extent, Mueller knows, this, even if true was not a crime. shite, given how he's using 18 USC 1001 if I decide to screw with an FBI agent and give him wrong directions to a place, I could get nailed
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:00 pm to Bard
quote:
The email does not appear to be speculation. "Word on the street" means "I don't want to name my source" and the information presented was specific.
LMAO! Holy Shite!
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:02 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
It is 100% impossible for you to recall every email you ever sent and remember them word for word.
Not if the subject is part of a massive, partisan witch hunt that began while it was all still fresh in my memory. If there's a chance I am even tangentially tied to someone involved I am going to be constantly refreshing myself on what I knew/did and when.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:04 pm to Bard
quote:
So he made it up? People only use phrases like "word on the street" to mean "I don't want to reveal where I got this from".
That' your twisting of what he stated. That is the only fact you are presenting.
I had many conversation about word on the street. EVEN TODAY.
On KD and what college he is transferring to My "word on the street" is he will go to Ms ST. It does not mean I talked to KB. It means from what I am reading... ONLINE!
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:04 pm to Bard
Dude just stop. Even left wing rags are saying this isn’t enough and Bob must have something else.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:06 pm to Bard
quote:
It could, but considering the circles Corsi moves in, that's highly doubtful
So guilt based on no evidence. WHAT?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:06 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
You really are a hack to believe that. I mean 100% hack.
quote:
Amazing how you clowns have gone from spending 6 years railing over the Patriot Act, but dead silent when Obama didn't repeal it, strengthened it and then weaponized the IRS and FBI to destroy political opponents.
Truly amazing.
This is how I know your stance is weak. When someone doesn't agree with you 100% of the time you immediately devolve to ad hominems regardless of someone's posting history.
Your response isn't just weak, it's pathetic.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:07 pm to Bard
quote:
Regardless, he knew a dump was coming yet lied about knowing about it to investigators.
No, it doesn't necessarily mean that at all. Corsi's a great example of person that runs in suspect circles and pays attention to lots of fringe shite. I'm sure he hears about a ton of info that he has no idea if it's true or not. If he leaves his sourcing vague he can claim credit if it turns out to be true, while also having the advantage of blaming it on a suspect source if it isn't. Either way the information could have come from a suspect source that he didn't necessarily have any real reason believe. He's just passing on hearsay.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:07 pm to YankeeBama
So the questions are:
What else does bob have?
Is it enough to prosecute?
If not, why did he spend 40 hours in a windowless room threatening him with something that he didn’t have?
What else does bob have?
Is it enough to prosecute?
If not, why did he spend 40 hours in a windowless room threatening him with something that he didn’t have?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:07 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
So guilt based on no evidence. WHAT?
Except that pesky email that shows he lied.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:09 pm to Bard
quote:
Except that pesky email that shows he lied.
Did you even watch the interview?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:11 pm to Bard
quote:
Not if the subject is part of a massive, partisan witch hunt that began while it was all still fresh in my memory
So you are saying that if they started an investigation that you had NO CLUE you were a part of you would commit that to memory?
quote:
If there's a chance I am even tangentially tied to someone involved I am going to be constantly refreshing myself on what I knew/did and when.
Thank you for helping everybody here see that.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:12 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
The better question to ask, is why is Mueller going after noted clowns like Jerome Corsi and Roger Stone? These guys were nothing but b rated celebrities, at best, in the right wing media . Why waste time with this or the paper used to formulate the plea deal?
Why worry about being lied to about something that is not even a crime and to that extent, Mueller knows, this, even if true was not a crime. shite, given how he's using 18 USC 1001 if I decide to screw with an FBI agent and give him wrong directions to a place, I could get nailed
Because he has nothing else. $30M blown and he has to have something so he's hanging his hat on trumped (no pun intended) up charges that are technically accurate but ultimately mean nothing (especially not that there was Russian-Trump collusion going on).
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:16 pm to Bard
quote:
quote:So guilt based on no evidence. WHAT? Except that pesky email that shows he lied.
No... YOO are convicting the guy based on who you "think" he runs around with. Not content.
Don't change it.
That pesky email does not show that he lied. That's you interpreting the email to mean something more than it says.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:17 pm to Jjdoc
Well, word on the street is that LSU plans on using more spread offense in their bowl game. Now, if it turns out that LSU runs more spread offense in their bowl game, then it will be obvious that I have been speaking to Ed Orgeron.
See how dumb this is?
See how dumb this is?
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News