- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crazed woman berates, attacks a man wearing a MAGA hat on NYC subway, then face plants
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:01 pm to Penrod
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:01 pm to Penrod
quote:“Will the two of you just shut the frick up.”
You absolutely implied relativism with that comment. There
Hank is taking sides!
FFS
1
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:08 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
For 99% of the posters here, their first thought is about picking sides in the confrontation, while my first thoughts are sympathy for the poor non-participants who have to put up with it in order to get home at the end of the long workday.
No, that was not your first thought. It was, “How can I make this thread about me by trolling the board in a way that implies I am against the innocent MAGA guy but that also allows me to back out and claim I wasn’t?”
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:11 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
“Will the two of you just shut the frick up.”
Hank is taking sides!
If after Hitler invaded Poland, a commentator said, “I wish the Poles and Germans would cut out the aggression” that commentator would have been siding with the Germans by implying equivalence in an asymmetrical situation.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:13 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If I were sitting on that train, reading my novel on my phone on the way home, I would not care who is “right” when two people start loudly squabbling ten feet away.
If that was what was on your mind then your post was completely gratuitous and irrelevant to the thread.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:51 pm to AggieHank86
Of course you would deflect from the behavior of the deranged leftist bitch by attempting to equate both of their behaviors.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:01 pm to Hback
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:58 pm to FlexDawg
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:41 pm to Hback
Skimming through this thread. My observations: 1) The entity Hank is likely a troll, 2) Perhaps if not a troll, this entity once reinstated is a condescending asshat. For this thread, this poster posed that two folks or sides were involved when it was clearly an aggression from a woman towards a guy wearing a MAGA cap. And took over the thread from that point going forward which is the goal. Again this entity has not yet responded to ClientNumber9's post on I suspect a condescending snarky response to this post which will include insults,
3/17/25 at 1:30 pm. Here again is this post below.
From ClientNumber9
Let me help you, AggieHank, because this is what I do for a living. I have two decades of enforcing federal immigration law.
Khalil does not enjoy the same 1st Amendment rights as an American Citizen. Khalil is a Lawful Permanent Resident (aka, "green card" holder). While this gives him broad rights in terms of coming and going from the US, owning property, etc., he has certain obligations that you and I don't have. For example, Permanent Residents have an expectation to "support the democratic form of government". (This link is taken directly from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services website.) Khalil has been accused of directly supporting named terrorist organizations and advocating against the United States.
Another way to lose your Permanent Residency status is through willful misrepresentation. I'm certain Khalil did not mention on his immigration application that he was harbored pro-Hamas beliefs and would be working to foment rebellion against the country he was seeking to enter. (Yes, there are blanks on the form that cover this.) Therefore, the United States can argue he willfully misrepresented his purpose for entry.
Finally, take a peek at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, specifically Section 212(a)(3)(C)(i). Under this law, the United States Secretary of State may deem a non-citizen deportable if he/she thinks their presence or activities may harm U.S. interests. Reread that sentence. Take it all in and let it wash over you.
ETA: Source- 10 years as a Border Patrol agent, 10 years working for an investigative three letter agency.
3/17/25 at 1:30 pm. Here again is this post below.
From ClientNumber9
Let me help you, AggieHank, because this is what I do for a living. I have two decades of enforcing federal immigration law.
Khalil does not enjoy the same 1st Amendment rights as an American Citizen. Khalil is a Lawful Permanent Resident (aka, "green card" holder). While this gives him broad rights in terms of coming and going from the US, owning property, etc., he has certain obligations that you and I don't have. For example, Permanent Residents have an expectation to "support the democratic form of government". (This link is taken directly from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services website.) Khalil has been accused of directly supporting named terrorist organizations and advocating against the United States.
Another way to lose your Permanent Residency status is through willful misrepresentation. I'm certain Khalil did not mention on his immigration application that he was harbored pro-Hamas beliefs and would be working to foment rebellion against the country he was seeking to enter. (Yes, there are blanks on the form that cover this.) Therefore, the United States can argue he willfully misrepresented his purpose for entry.
Finally, take a peek at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, specifically Section 212(a)(3)(C)(i). Under this law, the United States Secretary of State may deem a non-citizen deportable if he/she thinks their presence or activities may harm U.S. interests. Reread that sentence. Take it all in and let it wash over you.
ETA: Source- 10 years as a Border Patrol agent, 10 years working for an investigative three letter agency.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 9:47 pm to AquaAg84
If liberals want a war, they better start recruiting people who are not retarded.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:50 pm to Hback
Give that poor Karen a break. It wasn’t a fair fight!
She’s clearly high on stale boxed wine and festering cat piss.
She’s clearly high on stale boxed wine and festering cat piss.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:24 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Something you know absolutely nothing about.
I EXPECT a person of reasonable intelligence
quote:Another subject in which you have no reference for discussion.
look at the world like a normal human being
quote:Irony is very ironic.
this thread is a perfect demonstration that many folks are simply not capable of doing that.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:26 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
she thought she was going to cause a crowd, make a mob and make trouble, but her dumbass stood alone
People like her honestly believe the majority of Americans hate Trump and want to gang up on his supporters. It's ridiculous.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News