- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Constitutional amendments on the ballot. Let’s discuss.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:10 pm
quote:
Proposed Amendment No. 1 Act 223 (2025 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article X, Section 2(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to state civil service; to authorize additional positions in the unclassified state civil service by law; to prohibit the removal of such positions except by law; and to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors and provide a ballot proposition. “Do you support an amendment to allow the legislature to remove or add officers, positions, and employees to the unclassified state civil service?” (Amends Article X, Section 2(B))
Proposed Amendment No. 2 Act 218 (2025 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article VIII, Section 13(D)(1) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to certain effects and purposes for the proposed St. George community school system in East Baton Rouge Parish which shall be regarded and treated as a parish and shall have the authority granted parishes with respect to operating a school system, including the purposes of certain funding and the raising of certain local revenues for the support of elementary and secondary schools; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; to specify an election date for submission of the proposition to electors and to provide for a ballot proposition. Do you support an amendment to grant the St. George community school system in East Baton Rouge Parish the same authority granted parishes for purposes of Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution of Louisiana, including purposes related to the minimum foundation program, funding for certain school books and instructional materials, and the raising of certain local revenues for the support of elementary and secondary schools? (Amends Article VIII, Section 13(D)(1))
Proposed Amendment No. 3 Act 222 (2025 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 10.8(A)(1), (2), and (4), (B), and (C)(1) of the Constitution of Louisiana, to enact Article VII, Section 10.17, and to repeal Article VII, Sections 10(F)(4)(d), 10.1, 10.8(A)(3) and (C)(3), and 10.16(A)(9), relative to monies in the state treasury; to repeal the Education Excellence Fund within the Millennium Trust, the Louisiana Education Quality Trust Fund, and the Louisiana Quality Education Support Fund; to apply monies held in those funds to liabilities of the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana and to require local public school systems to pay a teacher pay raise with savings realized from payment of those retirement system liabilities; to require additional state general fund expenditures for the Minimum Foundation Program relative to such pay raises; to direct the state treasurer to take certain actions with respect to monies in repealed funds; to provide for calculation and transfer of such monies to the Overcollections Fund for use by specified entities pursuant to outlined restrictions; to execute technical changes; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters. Do you support an amendment to fund a $2,250 teacher pay raise and $1,125 support staff pay raise by utilizing the remaining savings from paying down the debt of the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana with monies from certain constitutional funds? (Effective January 1, 2027) (Amends Article VII, Section 10.8(A)(1), (2), and (4), (B), and (C)(1); Adds Article VII, Section 10.17; Repeals Article VII, Sections 10(F)(4)(d), 10.1, 10.8(A)(3) and (C)(3), and 10.16(A)(9))
Proposed Amendment No. 4 Act 221 (2025 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article VII, Sections 10.15(F)(1) and 18(A) and (B) and to add Article VII, Sections 20.1, 20.2, and 21(P) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem taxes; to authorize certain payments to certain parishes; to provide for the classification of certain property; to authorize the exemption of certain property under certain circumstances; to provide for effectiveness; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters. Do you support an amendment to allow a parish to reduce or exempt property tax on property held as business inventory and to provide for the classification of Public Service Property? (Amends Article VII, Sections 10.15(F)(1) and 18(A) and (B); Adds Article VII, Sections 20.1, 20.2, and 21(P))
Proposed Amendment No. 5 Act 219 (2025 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article V, Section 23(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to the mandatory retirement of judges; to provide that a judge shall not remain in office beyond his seventy-fifth birthday; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters. Do you support an amendment to change the mandatory retirement age for judges from seventy to seventy-five, provided that a judge may continue to serve to complete a term of office? (Amends Article V, Section 23(B))
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:12 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
arseinclarse
tGOAT
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:37 pm to arseinclarse
Amendment 2 is an easy YES for any living person who’s ever paid more than one tax dollar.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:43 pm to arseinclarse
1. frick no. The only thing which would make state government worse is if the legislature gets to hire and fire the rank-and-file workers for not bowing and scraping enough when they walk by.
2. Yes. The entire St. George drama was started because the parents there wanted more accountability and input into the school system in their area. A vote against this is a vote against parents being able to hold failing schools accountable.
3. No (moderately). Those programs pay out, BESE has full authority to spend their portion how they want. If they choose to not use it to pay teachers more, that's on them. Using the funds to pay down retirement debt is a worthwhile endeavor, but if they do this I don't want to hear a fricking word about the programs which had to be cut because of this.
4. Yes, absolutely. An inventory tax has got to be one of the most moronic, anti-business (and thus "anti-jobs") tax idea on the books. This shouldn't even be a question. I would rather see it done away with entirely, but letting the localities use it as a competition tool doesn't hurt my feelings.
5. No. We already bitch about people staying in various governmental roles too long. Why the hell would we want to RAISE the age limit for mandatory retirement on any of them?
2. Yes. The entire St. George drama was started because the parents there wanted more accountability and input into the school system in their area. A vote against this is a vote against parents being able to hold failing schools accountable.
3. No (moderately). Those programs pay out, BESE has full authority to spend their portion how they want. If they choose to not use it to pay teachers more, that's on them. Using the funds to pay down retirement debt is a worthwhile endeavor, but if they do this I don't want to hear a fricking word about the programs which had to be cut because of this.
4. Yes, absolutely. An inventory tax has got to be one of the most moronic, anti-business (and thus "anti-jobs") tax idea on the books. This shouldn't even be a question. I would rather see it done away with entirely, but letting the localities use it as a competition tool doesn't hurt my feelings.
5. No. We already bitch about people staying in various governmental roles too long. Why the hell would we want to RAISE the age limit for mandatory retirement on any of them?
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:20 pm to arseinclarse
No, yes, yes, yes, yes
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:14 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Constitution of Louisiana
tldr
Earnestly hope you baws can get out from under the blue but seriously frick Louisiana.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:15 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Proposing to amend Article X, Section 2(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to state civil service; to authorize additional positions in the unclassified state civil service by law; to prohibit the removal of such positions except by law
military dept wants to add like 700 positions so they can use them instead of national guard for state operations
basically your taxed twice to have the same service your taxes already provide through the national guard
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:48 pm to arseinclarse
No on all
Maybe after two straight years of failed amendments our legislators will finally realize the LA constitution is too big. Call a convention and rebuild it from the ground up.
Maybe after two straight years of failed amendments our legislators will finally realize the LA constitution is too big. Call a convention and rebuild it from the ground up.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:57 pm to Bard
Amendment 1 re state civil service is a good one. It makes it easier to fire incompetent bureaucrats. Anyone who is conservative should be in favor of this.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:31 pm to Riverside
quote:
It makes it easier to fire incompetent bureaucrats.
The exchange is that state jobs once again become spoils, the rewards doled out to friends and family members of those who win offices. They'll fire incompetent bureaucrats competent ones and replace them all with a constantly changing crew of people whose only qualification is "I know (insert politician's name here)".
quote:
Anyone who is conservative should be in favor of this.
Quite the opposite. This grants the legislature far larger power.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:24 pm to Riverside
quote:
Amendment 1 re state civil service is a good one. It makes it easier to fire incompetent bureaucrats. Anyone who is conservative should be in favor of this.
John Bel Edwards will be Governor again and he will replace every single person with “Democrats”. State employees are bad but it can definitely get worse.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:26 pm to Riverside
quote:
Amendment 1 re state civil service is a good one. It makes it easier to fire incompetent bureaucrats. Anyone who is conservative should be in favor of this.
What is worse
Incompetent bureaucrats
Political appointments to kids of campaign donors
Posted on 5/15/26 at 11:07 pm to TigerAllNightLong
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Posted on 5/16/26 at 12:24 am to Bard
quote:
The exchange is that state jobs once again become spoils, the rewards doled out to friends and family members of those who win offices.
We have that now: these people get hired based on who they know and then it’s impossible to fire them.
Popular
Back to top

10








