- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN panel, Andrea Mitchell gush over SCOTUS nominee
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:46 pm to Jbird
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:46 pm to Jbird
It’s not that she isn’t qualified. Merrick Garland was qualified. It’s that she is being confirmed less than a month before the election when Republicans previously said a nominee shouldn’t be confirmed in an election year.
3
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:48 pm to Cosmo
quote:They're trying to win an election. They know it's bad optics to shite on a woman as intellectually impressive and upstanding as ACB. They were able to do it with Palin by portraying her as a half-wit. And Palin reinforced that with stupid comments. ACB is a very different story.
They dont give a shite about that. They think they will be completely rewriting history over next 20-30 years. They are doing it now shitting on founding fathers
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:51 pm to Jbird
quote:
CNN panel, Andrea Mitchell gush over SCOTUS nominee
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:57 pm to theronswanson
quote:
It’s not that she isn’t qualified. Merrick Garland was qualified. It’s that she is being confirmed less than a month before the election when Republicans previously said a nominee shouldn’t be confirmed in an election year.
president senate same party
president senate different parties
This is not hard.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:04 pm to gthog61
quote:
president senate same party
president senate different parties
This is not hard.
Maybe that flies on the PT echo chamber but not with casual observers. To quote Lindsay Graham “ I want you to use my words against me. If there's a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said, 'Let's let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination,' " he said in 2016 shortly after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. "And you could use my words against me and you'd be absolutely right."
Doesn’t mention if the Senate chamber is a different party than the President.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:06 pm to theronswanson
quote:the way your side treated kavanaugh changed the calculation.
Maybe that flies on the PT echo chamber but not with casual observers. To quote Lindsay Graham “ I want you to use my words against me. If there's a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said, 'Let's let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination,' " he said in 2016 shortly after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. "And you could use my words against me and you'd be absolutely right."
gloves off from there.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:06 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
Sumpin's hinky.
All the media outlets are softening us up for the huge election fraud and the steal for Biden / Harris.
DO NOT FALL FOR IT
They steal it, we get angry and stay angry.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:07 pm to theronswanson
quote:
Republicans previously said a nominee shouldn’t be confirmed in an election year.
It is all good, we had our fingers crossed and stuff...
Bless your retarded heart....
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:08 pm to Jbird
The lack of personal attacks on her thus far have me wondering what’s really going on, though I do think it’s a function of polling showing the public supports ACB.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:08 pm to theronswanson
quote:Actually that was Biden's made up "rule". Democrat president--democrat "rules". Republican president--republican rules.
It’s not that she isn’t qualified. Merrick Garland was qualified. It’s that she is being confirmed less than a month before the election when Republicans previously said a nominee shouldn’t be confirmed in an election year.
Oh, and if you're seeking consistency--why aren't democarats willing to vote?
This post was edited on 10/13/20 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:08 pm to theronswanson
quote:
Maybe that flies on the PT echo chamber but not with casual observers. To quote Lindsay Graham “ I want you to use my words against me. If there's a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said, 'Let's let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination,' " he said in 2016 shortly after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. "And you could use my words against me and you'd be absolutely right."
Doesn’t mention if the Senate chamber is a different party than the President.
Maybe you can go frick yourself.
In both instances the democrats just wanted the Republicans to cede power.
The democrats never would in either situation.
Again, frick you.
also, lame duck vs reelection campaign
Did I say frick you loud enough?
echo chamber my arse, you are here
frick you
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:13 pm to Jbird
It’s because they know this is a losing battle.
Might as well take the road of “We like her” to make themselves look better
Might as well take the road of “We like her” to make themselves look better
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:16 pm to gthog61
quote:
go frick yourself...Again, frick you...frick you...frick you
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:18 pm to Cosmo
quote:
What do they have on her?
Is this gonna be a Roberts situation where somebody is pulling her strings?
My thought as well. I've seen this too many times. I hope I'm wrong.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:19 pm to theronswanson
No more playing nice to you dems.
So sorry.
You tried to butcher Kav in his hearings and you guys tried twice to bring down a sitting President with two bullsh!t clown shows and you expect to have your way now
The pubs are following the constitution during this process.
So sorry.
So sorry.
You tried to butcher Kav in his hearings and you guys tried twice to bring down a sitting President with two bullsh!t clown shows and you expect to have your way now
The pubs are following the constitution during this process.
So sorry.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:19 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
Sumpin's hinky.
They know it’s over. They’re giving Kamala et al an out.
Also, they know attacking her would sink them in 3 weeks.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:36 pm to gthog61
quote:
Maybe you can go frick yourself.
In both instances the democrats just wanted the Republicans to cede power.
The democrats never would in either situation.
Again, frick you.
also, lame duck vs reelection campaign
Did I say frick you loud enough?
echo chamber my arse, you are here
frick you
Compelling argument. I hope you feel better.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:36 pm to Jbird
The left attacks Barrett at their peril because she exemplifies what so many suburban female voters aspire to. Many suburban females loathe Trump, personally, while being more inclined on matters of policy to vote GOO.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
the way your side treated kavanaugh changed the calculation.
gloves off from there.
Lol my “side.” Just because I think one party is hypocritical on an issue doesn’t mean I have a side. Kavanaugh still sits on the Supreme Court doesn’t he?
Posted on 10/13/20 at 1:41 pm to Jbird
They know they can’t afford another Kavanaugh fiasco if they hope to pick up Senate seats.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News