- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: First charges filed by Mueller
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:10 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:10 am to Navytiger74
Are these indictments expected to be about some Turkish cleric?
2
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:14 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:15 am to Navytiger74
quote:
but getting a grand jury to indict on cue
So you think a guy with decades of legal experience with an already organized grand jury can't get an indictment in a week?
This better not be some chicken crap non-election indictment Mueller is dropping.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:15 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Are these indictments expected to be about some Turkish cleric?
Gülen?
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:17 am to Navytiger74
Yes
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:17 am to cajunangelle
Everybody is sourcing this story back to CNN. I’m wondering if this isn’t a trap set for CNN. If I were them, I would be very worried.
I have a feeling this leak is a distraction for something bigger that will happen Monday.
I have a feeling this leak is a distraction for something bigger that will happen Monday.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:33 am to Tyrusrex
quote:
Truely wishful thinking, all one has to do is just see what he's been investigating to see that it has nothing to do with Hillary and most likely Manafort, you know the guy who had the early morning raid.
It's almost definitely Manafort getting arrested Monday. But don't forget, he knows as much about the Podesta Group as he does the Trump campaign.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 7:58 am to LSUGrrrl
quote:
It's almost definitely Manafort getting arrested Monday. But don't forget, he knows as much about the Podesta Group as he does the Trump campaign.
The dirt he would have on Tony Podesta would be the same dirt on himself since it would involve lobbying for the Ukraine President.
Do agree that the indictments are for Mueller, but a twist would be interresting.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 8:10 am to cajunangelle
This is what Woolsey talked to Mueller about.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 8:41 am to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
or the first of many dominos to fall.
Well he wasn't authorized to investigate things not directly related to Russian election meddling so how do I get the money back he defrauded from the American taxpayer?
Posted on 10/28/17 at 8:48 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Wrong
Sorry you can't read, move along.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 8:52 am to mmcgrath
quote:
The dirt he would have on Tony Podesta would be the same dirt on himself since it would involve lobbying for the Ukraine President.
Manafort makes a deal to turn on the Podestas. That's not hard to figure out.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:09 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Just throwing this out, but getting a grand jury to indict on cue is probably trickier than throwing a lot info/misinfo into the media and stirring up a few tumultuous cycles. I’m thinking maybe someone saw the indictments coming and preempted them with all the other insinuations and innuendo
spot on
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:13 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Just throwing this out, but getting a grand jury to indict on cue is probably trickier than throwing a lot info/misinfo into the media and stirring up a few tumultuous cycles
Not really.
You can present any evidence you want to a grand jury. You don't have to present evidence that is favorable to the defendant. It's not hard to get a grand jury to indict.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:13 am to wookalar1013
quote:
spot on
bull shite
It is an indictment from a fricking grand jury from DC.
which would be the east coast equivalent of the OJ jury
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:15 am to wookalar1013
Why is this spot on? The documents were likely prepared long ago, all the prosecutor needs to do is present it. Throwing misleading information to the media would require more planning.
I'm not suggesting this is what happened, I'm suggesting getting a grand jury to indict after the presentation is prepared is fairly easy.
I'm not suggesting this is what happened, I'm suggesting getting a grand jury to indict after the presentation is prepared is fairly easy.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:17 am to Decatur
Leaky sauces from Honest Bob Mueller?
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:18 am to SabiDojo
quote:
Just throwing this out, but getting a grand jury to indict on cue is probably trickier than throwing a lot info/misinfo into the media and stirring up a few tumultuous cycles
What ???
Good lord no. Just NO!
quote:
You can present any evidence you want to a grand jury. You don't have to present evidence that is favorable to the defendant. It's not hard to get a grand jury to indict.
Exactly. There is no representation for the one being accused at all.
Posted on 10/28/17 at 9:22 am to JuiceTerry
Obtuse Juice hath emerged from under his rock only to be crushed again. 
Page 18 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News