Started By
Message

re: CNN Can Not Understand Why We Can Not Arrest The Drug Runners and Bring Them to Trial.

Posted on 12/7/25 at 8:36 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34896 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

CNN host asks why we can't arrest and try the terrorists on the drug boats.


So don’t defund the police?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Please explain what “rights” a criminal operating in international waters on an unflagged vessel enjoys under American law. This I want to hear.
You didn't understand the first three times. Why bother with a fourth attempt?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Is there due process for the American victims who are murdered by fentanyl?
Provision of "due process" is a Constitutional OBLIGATION of the US government.

Do you contend that the US government is somehow denying due process to the junkies and addicts?

Do you (like SOS) believe that the US government has some Constitutional obligation to prevent junkies and addicts from killing themselves? If so (unlike SOS), can you point us to the Constitutional provision which gives rise to that duty?
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 10:21 pm
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Well by definition “victims” don’t ever get due process. That’s reserved for those accused of crimes by the criminal justice system. And I take issue with the use of the word murdered. They were addicts that made bad choices and died.
A realist who also understands the Constitution. I like it.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

quote:

Kevin O’Leary answers her and GOES OFF.

Goes off? He calmly and succinctly rebutted her question with a logical and well-stated response.

The click bait these people use in their posts gets tiresome. "From the top rope!" and "Scorched Earth!" and "Eviscerates!". For the love of GOD, these people are just responding. I'd have watched anyway even if she just typed out "check out his excellent response".
Bravo. You just earned 50 Reasonable Internet Points.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

No. A chihuahua does not become a pit bull, just because you call him one. He may well be a vicious little fricker, but he ain’t a pit bull.
quote:

But yet in your ... view a man can magically become a woman because the man claims to be a woman.

You don't read so good. I said exactly the opposite re Rachel Levine a day or so ago.

I do NOT accept the premise that Levine has BECOME a woman by choosing to live as one, any more than Dolezal "became" Black by living as a Black woman.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

It’s proven that it IS NOT ILLEGAL!!!
You are wrong, and you clearly have a VERY shallow and narrow understanding of the law of the sea.
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
186 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

You are wrong, and you clearly have a VERY shallow and narrow understanding of the law of the sea.


Whatever “law of the sea” you’re talking about does not apply to the US Navy.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

They were called narcoterrorists long before Trump was elected.
Very true.

The term was coined to provide cover for governments which didn't want to be bothered with their Constitutions when dealing with especially violent criminals. It goes all the way back to South America in the 1980s.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

the United States Navy was founded for the specific purpose of fighting criminal activity outside our borders.
Well, sort of.

It was founded in large part to deal with piracy, which is certainly a very specific subset of "criminal activity."

The analogy to these drug runners falls apart when you look at the definition of "piracy" under UNCLOS.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

can you downvote from each of your alter accounts?
I never bother downvoting you. You just aren't worth the effort.

Apparently, quite a few people hold you in rather low regard.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Not one person would die if people avoided drugs.
"If it saves just ONE junkie ...."
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
186 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

It was founded in large part to deal with piracy, which is certainly a very specific subset of "criminal activity." The analogy to these drug runners falls apart when you look at the definition of "piracy" under UNCLOS.


Piracy has been considered a criminal enterprise for centuries and the UN is pretty much only legitimate when backed up by the US military, especially when when it comes to the world’s oceans. So their rules really don’t apply to us.
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
1073 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

The term was coined to provide cover for governments which didn't want to be bothered with their Constitutions when dealing with especially violent criminals. It goes all the way back to South America in the 1980s.


Perhaps, but then there’s the fact that they terrorize people and smuggle narcotics. Blow their asses up.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15942 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:46 pm to
It's amazing you guys fell for the regime propaganda so easily
Then what’s the upside. What’s the smoke and mirrors?

Do you think we don’t know this is happening because this is bigger than drugs on Venezuelan drug boats.

This is about Venezuela being a proxy to our biggest enemies as well as emptying their prisons into our country, while ALSO killing Americans with drugs.

The oil is negligible.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
40627 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

RelentlessAnalysis


AggieHank86 the dumbass
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10520 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

How do you feel about FDR not letting Pearl Harbor know what he knew?


I personally feel just fine about it, since all he knew was...

quote:

...the Office of Naval Intelligence on December 4 warned, "In anticipation of open conflict with this country, Japan is vigorously utilizing every available agency to secure military, naval and commercial information, paying particular attention to the West Coast, the Panama Canal and the Territory of Hawaii."


And also since that was only one of dozens of "tips," if you can call it that, as it doesn't warn of any sort of attack, only that Japan had been gathering intel over an area that spanned over a million square miles and each point was separated from the others by a minimum of 5,500 miles.

So yeah, if FDR had been psychic enough to determine which of the dozens of tips US intelligence had received were legitimate, then psychic enough to figure out that it was talking about a direct attack, then psychic enough to guess the location of the target in a scenario analogous to guessing the exact location of one needle in three separate potential haystacks separated by 10 miles between them, then yeah, we could have avoided being involved in WWII.

We were so close.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20127 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Provision of "due process" is a Constitutional OBLIGATION of the US government.


Even to non-citizens conducting what is in effect chemical warfare against American citizens?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1782 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:08 am to
quote:

quote:

Provision of "due process" is a Constitutional OBLIGATION of the US government.
Even to non-citizens conducting what is in effect chemical warfare against American citizens?
JFC, no one is conducting "chemical warfare against American citizens." They are selling a product to willing buyers.

They are breaking the law, not engaging in warfare. They don't want to destroy the US. Our idiot junkies and addicts are their best customers.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 12:31 am
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
186 posts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:10 am to
quote:

They are breaking the law, not engaging in warfare. They don't want to destroy the US. Our idiot junkies and addicts are their best customers.


True. And we have no obligation to arrest them for their crimes. In fact, it could be argued that the USG has a legal and moral obligation to violently destroy them before their lethal products reach our shores.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram