Started By
Message

re: Clay and Buck gaslighting conservatives about Epstein?

Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:44 pm to
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
347 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Jeffrey Epstein was twice arrested and convicted of sex trafficking women, many of them under age. That’s not in dispute


I dispute this. He was only convicted once.

Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child (under the age of 18) for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.

The second time he was arrested was in 2019 on federal charges for his actions between 2002 and 2005. He died in his jail cell a month after his arrest while awaiting trial. No conviction.
Posted by Ham Malone
Member since Nov 2010
2693 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:46 pm to
Interesting that the guy who makes a living defending Israel on here is now defending Epstein. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46952 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

I dispute this. He was only convicted once.




Yes, yes, you're so correct. I am rightfully admonished in my own thread. That's SUPER important to not wrongfully rewrite that details of a dead man's legal & criminal history.

This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 4:00 pm
Posted by LSUBALLER
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
21597 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:02 pm to
Good forbid your friend was wrong. Loser!
Posted by LSUBALLER
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
21597 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:02 pm to
Or was he really wrong? Let me guess whatever fits your narrative .
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
347 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:31 pm to
You specifically stated "That's not in dispute."

I hope you resolve your hysteria and come to your senses. I think many people got too wrapped up in the Q stuff.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Are they conflating Epstein and the Pizzagate/Q stuff to diminish the Epstein story? Or are they responding to the Pizzagate/Q stuff being conflated onto the real Epstein saga?


That conflation is very likely the objective. Buck and Clay are the ones hoping to dismiss the entire Epstein conspiracy as nothing more than silly Q-Anon talk.

quote:

If the latter, I'm not sure why the fault lies with Clay and Buck.


Sexton must ask permission from the CIA on what he can discuss in a book. I think it is a safe assumption the same is true about what he can say on the radio.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7727 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:40 pm to
Don’t listen to them, but Clay looks like a penis head wrapped in a scrotum sack. Can’t stand that mfr.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7727 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

So why are these guys acting as if there’s not a long list of clients like Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton who absolutely partook in this venture? I just don’t get it.

Oh the “we aren’t going to find some long list of names on a piece of paper in a safe or his hard drives” gaslighting. Well no one said that, but you start noting nameS a list will start to form. Smfh
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 4:47 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138679 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

They as in Clay and Buck? No. That's standard SRA nonsense that Pizzagate adapted
SlowFlowPro w/ legit pushback.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46952 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:11 pm to
He was arrested 2x, genius, for basically the same crime.


Good fricking god.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11336 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

But ordering pizza when you have a group of people is very common.


It's not common for rich people to drink grape soda or to specify 'grape' soda when talking about a "pizza party."
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7868 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:29 pm to
Clay and Buck were correct. You "everything Epstein" douchebags are almost as bad as the blue-haired, deranged, Leftist, white women.

Epstein was a low-life, creep who, primarily, hooked up pervy, well-connected men with young, but 18+ models and wannabe models.

The pizza, blood-drinking stuff is so stupid and I'm embarrassed y'all call yourselves fellow conservatives.

Also, most likely, Epstein committed suicide. I work in the business of suicide mitigation... Epstein fully fit the profile.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28046 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

The podestas are creeps and I don't think it's completely unreasonable that there is some coded language baked into that stuff


I think it's completely unreasonable to believe there isn't coded language in those emails. I have no idea if it's about kids, their cocaine habit, illegal campaign cash, whatever.

But those are people using code to hide the real meaning behind their communications.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2171 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:58 pm to
You fools are gaslighting yourselves with the Epstein distraction. It is nothing more than cover for the do nothing Republicans in Congress. They will claim they “got the files released and held public hearings” which will lead to nothing. This is going nowhere
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46952 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:26 pm to
The GOP need no dog & pony show to NOT do something. The Save Act is a perfect example.

There are no 'hearings'. This is just appearing before a committee. Zero 'gotchya' moments.

But the gaslighting is claiming there's no THERE there, when clearly there was. The game Buck and Clay are playing is pretending that Spirit Dinners, child sacrifice and Comet Ping Pong Pizza were obvious Qanon fairy tales, so that means there WASN'T a massive sex ring going on here. And it involved the elites in gov and business, at least.

Why any conservatives are paying this game of 'nothing to see here, move along' is annoying AF.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2171 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:36 pm to
What great, new information has been shared? Nearly every person who has resigned or possibly prosecuted in England isn’t a new name and that information has been widely speculated. Y’all act like you are some crusaders for truth and justice. Everyone who is sane is against child sex abuse, it isn’t some purity test or great quality that few possess but you aren’t stopping child abuse that happened over a decade ago
Posted by Mobile Patriot
Mobile
Member since Aug 2024
1000 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:07 pm to
Democrats want to focus on Epstein exclusively now because they were caught stealing billions of our tax dollars. The more conservatives focus on Epstein, the easier it is to wait Trump out and continue their raid on tax dollars. (That includes the RINOs too, who only want to be an opposition party).
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13382 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

I think it's completely unreasonable to believe there isn't coded language in those emails. I have no idea if it's about kids, their cocaine habit, illegal campaign cash, whatever.


This is me as well.

Since I don't doink little kids I have no idea what common code words are used by people who do.

The emails are clearly code, but I'm completely unqualified to give an opinion on what the code means.

I'm waiting for the investigation to play out with an open mind.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2171 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 5:32 am to
Precisely and yet again Republicans are too stupid to figure it out or don’t care to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram