- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: China's Bitchslap
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:02 pm to DeBoar
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:02 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Why didn’t China ever help their ally when we decimated Irans Air Force, Navy and took out all of their leadership?
China's global dominance strategy is just like mine was when I was the undisputed Risk Champion......by using persuasive arguments and psychology I would convince others I wasn't the threat, eventually the others would weaken themselves fighting and I would move in and snatch victory.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:06 pm to DD_Rolltide
Being that media has largely ignored you may want to consider different. If it was a failure then 24/7 media would still be dragging on
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:46 pm to DD_Rolltide
quote:
First we go ahead and allow 500,000 visa's for the CCP, allow them to buy up our farmland
Our university system is struggling as it is. We need those paying customers. And the farmland issue is one of the most stupid ones I’ve ever heard of. As I’ve been posting for years, if the shite hits the fan with China we will confiscate the land and then we will have the land AND their money.
I want China to invest heavily in America, and I don’t want Americans investing in China.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:59 pm to Penrod
quote:
Our university system is struggling as it is. We need those paying customers.
Why do we, the country broadly, need those customers?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:04 pm to DD_Rolltide
quote:
What the frick do you want me to do, ignore things that I don't like and put my fingers in my ears and scream NAH UHHH!!! ?
Well that's kinda the norm for the cult, so yes---they expect rational ppl to do just this.
Let Trump sell his fraudulent phones and enrich his family and friends in ways we have never seen, all while the regular Joe American sucks it up and enjoys higher inflation.
Eat your cake and shut up.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:05 pm to Zap Rowsdower
Yes, China is known for their brilliant military strategies
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:09 pm to DD_Rolltide
Most likely, Trump and the US is giving into China in exchange for something Israel wants. Probably something relating to the Iran conflict.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:10 pm to Rip Torner
quote:
Yes, China is known for their brilliant military strategies
I mean one of their own literally wrote something called The Art of War
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:15 pm to Jbird
quote:
fricking alters
? If there's something you disagree with, I'm all ears. What I said makes logical sense to me China is buying and selling from Iran still but other than that they have not provided direct support to their ally. It'll be interesting to see if that changes. I doubt they were threatening to jump in, but do they stop selling certain materials to Iran? It'll be interesting to see.
If you have a better hypothesis as to why Trump is BFFs with China now and is cool with 500,000 students that likely steal from us, and other concessions then please let us know. Something beyond moving the goal posts.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:25 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Why do we, the country broadly, need those customers?
Well, that’s a good question that I don’t know how to answer. On one hand, the universities are employment programs for liberals. Let them fail. On the other hand, our university system, particularly the STEM programs, are a huge resource for the US, and the 500,000 Chinese are largely in STEM. If we banned them then STEM programs in France, Germany, and probably Asia would step up and challenge our supremacy. I guess Trump took a look at that and figured the impact would be worse for us than for China.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:28 pm to The_Duke
Melty Melt melt. Meltily melting. fig.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:45 pm to Houag80
quote:
Melty Melt melt. Meltily melting. fig.
Def something a queer would type
Posted on 5/24/26 at 12:10 am to NC_Tigah
quote:how so?
The Taiwan exchange was telling, especially compared with what Xi thought he had in hand
Posted on 5/24/26 at 3:30 am to DD_Rolltide
People really think Trump is getting played, he's so frickin stupid they all trying to kill him, wake up people
Posted on 5/24/26 at 6:12 am to HagaDaga
quote:During the Potatobrain Administration, Xi advanced aggressiveness of the Taiwan conversation to "China will reunite with Taiwan." It was a step up from past holdings that "China and Taiwan should reunite." Immediately our press began issuing "not if, but when," proclamations about China taking Taiwan.
how so?
In some instances, based on Beijing's messaging, our CCP media sycophants referred to the inevitability of China "retaking" Taiwan -- an absurdity fully establishing our media buy-in to CCP propaganda that Taiwan is a "breakaway republic." In fact, Russia has more claim to Ukraine than China has to Taiwan. Put differently, a republic cannot "breakaway" from something to which it never belonged.
Rumors circulated in early 2026 that Xi intended to confront Trump with the "inevitable" proposition in their March summit. But a couple of things occurred in the interlude. The US walked into Venezuela and flipped its allegiance (and oil) away from Cuba and the CCP in a matter of hours. The US followed that by running through Chinese military technology in Iran like a hot knife through butter. Again, massively interrupting Chines oil imports in the process.
So when Xi and Trump finally did have the Taiwan conversation recently, there was no proclamation of "We are going to take Taiwan." Rather it was a Xi query, "Would the US militarily intervene, IF we invaded Taiwan?" That may seem a subtle shift. It isn't.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 6:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Rather it was a Xi query, "Would the US militarily intervene, IF we invaded Taiwan?" That may seem a subtle shift. It isn't.
I ain’t feeling that. Too definitive, too straightforward, leaves none of that vague wiggle room all leaders love….I just dont see that one, Jebrodiah.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 6:45 am to The_Duke
That's mighty salty. You appear to be a deep thinker. 
Back to top

0






