- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Chief WH Troll Bannon: I'd prefer if only property owners could vote
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:54 pm
Shaun King –
Verified account ?@ShaunKing
URGENT. Trump's Chief Strategist, Stephen Bannon, says he'd prefer "if only property owners could vote."
Verified account ?@ShaunKing
URGENT. Trump's Chief Strategist, Stephen Bannon, says he'd prefer "if only property owners could vote."
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:56 pm to joshnorris14
Well that is pretty much how the framers intended it
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:56 pm to joshnorris14
How many votes would China get?
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:56 pm to joshnorris14
Bannon is wrong about this. Everybody knows it should only be property owners who speak English. Damn you Bannon.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:57 pm to joshnorris14
he should hold out for "only golfers who own 2nd houses in Vail, Palm Springs or Newport".
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:58 pm to geauxturbo
Talcum X is triggered lol
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:58 pm to joshnorris14
its like he posts here.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:59 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
prefer "if only property owners could vote."
I would be ok with having only taxpayers vote too.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:59 pm to joshnorris14
Liberal melts in 3, 2, 1
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:59 pm to joshnorris14
So if I owned 5 houses, I get 5 votes? Me likey.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:01 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Chief WH Troll Bannon: I'd prefer if only property owners could vote
The problem I personally have with this (highly unlikely scenario) is, I don't own "property" (at least not any real estate), but I pay a good bit in taxes every year.
If my right to vote gets taken away just because I don't own property, I had better not see another single penny taken out of my paycheck for taxes ever again.
ETA: Assuming you don't pay taxes if you don't get to vote, that means home owner's taxes start sky rocketing and you have de-incentivized owning property.
This post was edited on 11/28/16 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:03 pm to dcrews
quote:
If my right to vote gets taken away just because I don't own property, I had better not see another single penny taken out of my paycheck for taxes ever again.
That's quite alright, by my standards.
While it's not quite the same, in pre-Enlightenment Europe before all the upheavals, aristocrats had more legal responsibility and laws they had to abide by than the average person. With greater privilege comes greater contribution and sacrifice.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:03 pm to idlewatcher
I had an Econ professor in college who proposed one vote per person and then one additional vote for every $70k of income.
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:04 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
I agree with him
What do you do with people who pay large amounts of taxes, but don't own property?
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:05 pm to WarBuzzard
quote:
Well that is pretty much how the framers intended it
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News