- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
AUveritas
| Favorite team: | Auburn |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3628 |
| Registered on: | 8/30/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Vance thinks aliens are actually demons
Posted by AUveritas on 3/28/26 at 10:40 pm to hawgfaninc
Why would demons need vehicles? With lights?
quote:
If the US intentionally targeted him, that suggests he wasn't the one they wanted to negotiate with.
Has it been confirmed that we were the ones that took him out? Maybe our "allies" don't want peace yet.
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by AUveritas on 3/23/26 at 9:38 am to hawgfaninc
No regime change or end to the Islamic Republic mullahs? We're about to 100% leave the Iranian people in the lurch.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/15/26 at 2:30 pm to Squirrelmeister
1 Thesselonians 4:15
For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
I think it's safe to say that Paul's use of "we" would include himself. He obviously felt that Jesus would return in his lifetime.
In 1 Corinthians 7:26–31, Paul advises against marriage and major life changes, arguing that "the time is short" and "this world in its present form is passing away," indicating a belief that the end was near.
For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
I think it's safe to say that Paul's use of "we" would include himself. He obviously felt that Jesus would return in his lifetime.
In 1 Corinthians 7:26–31, Paul advises against marriage and major life changes, arguing that "the time is short" and "this world in its present form is passing away," indicating a belief that the end was near.
quote:
Arm the Iranians.
quote:
There it is
How? With what? How do we determine only the good guys will get them? Do we need to train them?
It sounds good on paper, logistically not so much.
re: CONTINUED: Prof Jiang's War analyses & predictions (Eschatological angle & plot twists)
Posted by AUveritas on 3/15/26 at 1:28 pm to EphesianArmor
Dispensational theology and eschatology are doing more harm to this country than even the most radical leftist could ever hope to do.
quote:
Paul wrote prodigiously.
I was talking about biographical information for future posterity. Paul wrote letters to settle doctrinal disputes, primarily. However, Paul obviously felt that Jesus' return was imminent (though he seemed to change his mind in his later writings), as did the Gospel writers that quoted Jesus as saying that He would return before their generation would pass away.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/15/26 at 9:23 am to FooManChoo
quote:
I don’t worship the Bible
You have absolutely made an idol out of Scripture.
quote:
If they are God’s word, then there will be characteristics of it that reflect God’s character.
Ig God wrote them Himself and dropped them from Heaven.
quote:
Again, it is strange to see a supposed Christian work so hard to show that the Bible is less than what it claims about itself. I really don’t think you’ve thought this through.
It makes no claim of inerrancy. And, as you said yourself, any mention of Scripture refers only to the OT.
quote:
The Scriptures were known and used widely as such by the end of the first century. Those writings from and approved by the Apostles had pedigree that were known by the churches they were sent to.
Not in the way you're claiming. Different churches used different Scriptures.
quote:
The other writings were known and used, but not as sacred Scripture
Wrong again. They were treated as Scripture.
quote:
You also seem to not understand the difference between the canon being complete and the canon being formally acknowledged by a Council.
There was no universal canon. It's why the Catholics, Orthodox and Copts still have different canons.
quote:
As Christianity spread to other non-Jewish nations, the need for writing was necessary, and the epistles and gospels eventually were written for that need.
That's just patently false. There was nothing written down initially because Paul and other Christians believed Jesus would return in their lifetime. They didn't see a need to write things down until it started to seem they could be wrong
quote:
2 Timothy 3:16-17 speaks of the Scriptures as being God-breathed. 2 Peter 1:20-21 says that Scripture is from God, not man. Jesus taught many places that Scripture cannot be broken, such as in John 10:35. Hebrews 6:8 says God cannot lie.
Again, this references only the OT. Also, nowhere do you see inerrancy referenced.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/15/26 at 3:13 am to FooManChoo
quote:
The Bible includes the Old Testament, which was around long before the incarnation of Jesus.
If we were discussing the Jewish Bible, that'd be relevant.
quote:
It sure is odd to see a supposed Christian work so hard to attack the Bible.
It's as weird to me to see someone worship a book and assign it attributes that belong only to God.
quote:
Also, the Bible was complete by the end of the fist century
Individual books that most couldn't read were. The Bible wasn't complete for 400 years. Early Churches also used books like The Epistles of Clement, the Didache, The Shepherd of Hermas, etc.
It's weird that Jesus never wrote anything down, nor did any of His followers for a generation yet you think it is the linchpin of Christianity. Even the Bible that you think is perfect and contains all sources of Chrostoan truth makes no claims about being the inerrant word of God. But Paul does claim that the Church is the source for all truth
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/15/26 at 1:40 am to FooManChoo
Christianity predates the Bible. How can Christianity be dependent on it? What were the implications for the 1st generation of Christians who had no Bible? Never mind the fact that there wasn't a canon for the first 400 years of Christianity.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/14/26 at 7:04 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Even the link you provided states that copyist errors occurred.
So, contradictions exist and the Bible isn't inerrant?
quote:
The inerrancy of the Bible speaks to the original autographs, not all copies that could ever be made
But we don't have the original autographs so such a claim is nonsensical. We have copies of copies. You have no grounds to claim that it's just the copies that are wrong.
quote:
because if it is God's revelation, it will not have been transmitted with errors.
But what if it's just people trying to make sense of God's revelation with their very limited mind?
quote:
Are you a Christian?
Yes. But my faith isn't dependent on the Bible. I hold to the infallibility of the Bible rather than literal inerrancy. I believe the spiritual message and its overarching truth are divine and true, even if the human recording of history or science reflects the era in which it was written and is susceptible to minor errors.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/14/26 at 6:01 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
You cited an apparent contradiction and then followed up by making the claim that most biblical scholars agree with you.
Quote:
The basic idea is that the oldest tradition is assumed to have preserved the story of an otherwise unknown Elhanan who killed Goliath, while later traditions deliberately attributed this heroic deed to David to shore up the reputation of Israel’s greatest king
[link=(Who Really Killed Goliath? https://share.google/qZew6q9WnfoTuQW9X)]Who Really Killed Goliath?[/link]
quote:
it's merely a copyist error, as I believe
Based on what? This is the mental gymnastics I am referring to. Which scribe would have made the mistake? How does this now now show that the Bible is not inerrant if you are correct?
quote:
If it's God's word, then it is incapable of error, and therefore all other "facts" must be interpreted in light of God's revelation, not the other way around.
So, obvious errors can't be errors because you think there can't be errors?
Why have so many conservatives (a la Candace and Tucker) begun parroting crazy conspiracy theories? Did it begin with the Q-tard stuff?
Edit: Sorry. I see that someone already brought this up.
Edit: Sorry. I see that someone already brought this up.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/14/26 at 2:55 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
There were no errors in God’s word as originally written. The autographs were infallible.
Errors can exist in copies, and yet again I say that we know what the original autographs were.
We are not in agreement.
Then feel free to link a copy of the oldest manuscripts and show that the translations are wrong.
quote:
And yet God’s word is clear that it was David.
It's absolutely not. I just showed that it's not.
quote:
“Biblical scholars” believe a lot of things that are intended to destroy the credibility of the Bible because a lot of “Biblical scholars” don’t even believe the Bible is God’s revelation.
Even if that were true (which it absolutely isn't), it doesn't make their conclusions false. When truth conflicts with your opinions, it doesn't automatically make the facts wrong.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/14/26 at 12:58 am to FooManChoo
quote:
The natural response is that there was a copyist error in 2nd Samuel 21, with an omission of "the brother of", which 1 Chronicles rightly includes. 1 Samuel 17 is the long narrative and is repeated many times in the Scriptures, so that passage is the baseline for the true narrative. Scribal errors are common in the biblical manuscripts
So, there are errors. Glad we agree.
quote:
but fortunately God has preserved His word in such a way that we can tell what was original.
And most Biblical scholars agree that Elhanan was likely the original slayer of Goliath.
quote:
"Mental gymnastics" is a pejorative used when someone tries to explain away what is not an actual contradiction. It's rather convenient for folks like you: you can claim a contradiction exists, and then belittle any response to the contrary. Instead "mental gymnastics", I prefer the term "explanation".
I would too.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/13/26 at 9:03 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I think you should consider what constitutes a true contradiction and then look into those alleged contradictions a bit more. The internet has made this a lot easier to talk about
There are many. For instance:
1 Samuel 17 says David killed Goliath.
2 Samuel 21:19 says Elhanan did.
1 Chronicles 20:5 tries to fix the contradiction saying Elhanan actually killed Goliath's brother.
Trying to make those verses not contradict each other is the very definition of mental gymnastics
quote:.
I think you should check your church history on that
I know it very well. Thanks, though.
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by AUveritas on 3/13/26 at 4:35 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Second, I believe the Bible is the word of God, and since God cannot lie, the Bible must be true, in spite of what fallible men say.
I'm a Christian but it's undeniable that there are contradictions in the Bible. The widespread dogma of Biblical inerrancy is fairly new.
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by AUveritas on 3/9/26 at 2:29 pm to VolInBavaria
quote:
ABC News is reporting that U.S. officials have intercepted an encrypted communication believed to have originated in Iran that may serve as "an operational trigger" for "sleeper assets" outside the country based on "preliminary signal analysis" according to a federal alert sent to law enforcement agencies
Uh oh. False flag time. Have to justify putting boots on the ground to the American people.
This is a pretty good synopsis of the possible (and plausible) strategy of Iran.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by AUveritas on 3/3/26 at 8:59 am to tigafan4life
For those of you who have served or are familiar with logistics and supply, during the prolonged high-intensity conflict with Iran, how does the U.S. military manage attrition of ordnance and the secure transport of JP-5 aviation fuel to carrier strike groups?
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by AUveritas on 3/1/26 at 9:49 am to Mushroom1968
NSFW: Language/Subtitles
Too funny not to post on here. These are some creative insults.
Too funny not to post on here. These are some creative insults.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Popular
0












