- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:35 am to Vandergriff
quote:
And yet big pharma has full immunity against any consequences. Why is that?
It’s not full immunity. If one can prove willful misconduct, they can recover from a manufacturer directly.
The reason they were granted any immunity at all was obviously to promote a speedy process to formulate a vaccine.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:39 am to smh4wg
quote:
pcr test
quote:
paulcraigroberts
Hmmmm
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:10 am to smh4wg
I have a feeling things are about to get bad.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:13 am to momentoftruth87
The whole country was scammed, people are starting to wake up….
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:15 am to CamdenTiger
Yep. This year won’t be good, but hopefully it fixes us.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 3:19 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
It’s not full immunity. If one can prove willful misconduct, they can recover from a manufacturer directly.
C'mon Mick
Posted on 12/28/21 at 5:05 am to DMAN1968
Probably why Biden bought half a billion unreliable rapid tests
Posted on 12/28/21 at 6:38 am to smh4wg
The real question is: are these new test recommendations any more reliable than the super shitty PCR tests that have been used successfully since the beginning to churn up fear by wildly overstating the true case count.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:11 am to smh4wg
You people either don't read links at all or don't read them carefully.
READ WHAT IT SAYS.
It says the CDC is withdrawing THIS test, because there are new tests out there.
Quote -
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods.
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.
READ WHAT IT SAYS.
It says the CDC is withdrawing THIS test, because there are new tests out there.
Quote -
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods.
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:14 am to jmcwhrter
quote:
Probably why Biden bought half a billion unreliable rapid tests.
They bought the rapid nasal swab tests not the PCR tests.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:16 am to smh4wg
But just follow the science.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 7:49 am to smh4wg
I'm just throwing this out there concerning the actual isolation and identification of COVID19.
Page 42, second paragraph. LINK
>Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA
Here is something from Canada.
LINK
>Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever.
Page 42, second paragraph. LINK
>Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA
Here is something from Canada.
LINK
>Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 8:04 am to Eurocat
quote:
They bought the rapid nasal swab tests not the PCR tests.
Which are more unreliable than the PCR.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 8:20 am to smh4wg
What month is this? This was announced and known/discussed thoroughly on here for months starting back in July. Did we all just wake up from a coma?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 8:47 am to soonerthebetter
quote:
>Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever.
Y’all are so fricking dumb.
Do you know when we see links to Democratic Underground and laugh at how stupid they sound?
These are exactly the types of threads people from democratic underground copy and paste to their forum and laugh at all the conservatives.
Your link describes culturing a virus. That means sampling the virus from an infected patient and growing it in a medium. For viruses we usually do this with animal cells since viruses can’t replicate on their own, they require a cell. We’ve done this for a hundred years.
Now this click bait bullshite link is trying to say that we have never isolated the virus because it’s cultured.
You can literally see the fricking virus with your own eyes with a scanning electron microscope image of the virus. LINK
quote:
This scanning electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2 (yellow)—also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus that causes COVID-19—isolated from a patient in the U.S., emerging from the surface of cells (blue/pink) cultured in the lab.
You just saw it with your own eyes.
Now stop being a fricking moron and reading click bait articles with more pop ups than your teenage sons porn infested computer
This post was edited on 12/28/21 at 8:49 am
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:19 am to WaWaWeeWa
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:47 am to Mickey Goldmill
The PCR test has been notoriously problematic since the beginning. It’s not even debated anymore. It’s own inventor has been very public about this. Not sure why your slavish little brain compels you to come on here and shill for everything related to the COVID religion.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:52 am to the808bass
The rapid tests are supposedly only 30-40% accurate for asymptomatic patients. fricking gold standard.
Posted on 12/29/21 at 2:19 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
(Sigh)
(frown)
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News