- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cash for Uranium
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:09 am to tigersbh
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:09 am to tigersbh
Right. I was going to mention this. The Uranium can be traced to its origin. Who wants to bet that we will end up finding out that Iran got their Uranium from Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama through the Uranium One deal?
1
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:10 am to Average_Comments
quote:
So now we are giving them money and that's ok?
quote:We are giving them their money for their uranium. Yeah, I'd say that is okay.
elease of $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds in exchange for Iran giving up its stockpiles of enriched uranium.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:10 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
We are not giving them our money. It's Iranian funds that we had frozen. Cry more though
But when Obama unfroze their assets 10+ years ago, it was interpreted as he gave them palettes of cash lol
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:11 am to Average_Comments
quote:
According to Axios, citing two U.S. officials, a three-page plan is at the center of U.S.-Iranian peace talks. One facet of the plan reportedly being discussed by both sides is the release of $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds in exchange for Iran giving up its stockpiles of enriched uranium. Per the report, earlier in the negotiation process, the U.S. offered the release of $6 billion and the Iranians countered with a demand to release $27 billion. U.S. officials have described the potential deal as a “cash-for-uranium concept.”
Great, easily get a hold of the enriched uranium.
Then proceed to bombing the sht out of them and block their income because no matter what Iran agrees to, they can not be trusted.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:13 am to Average_Comments
$20 Billion unfrozen assets
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:13 am to Average_Comments
quote:
This is exactly what Obama and Biden did. So narrative changes.
All we got from Iran then was empty promises. Now we would get uranium.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:13 am to BTROleMisser
I am using sarcasm to reference the double standard. Why so hard to admit that the Dems were vilified for a similar policy?
The old boss is the new boss...
The old boss is the new boss...
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:13 am to AlterEd
If Iran does have uranium, does that mean the left has been lying this entire time?
And that nukes were indeed a reason for the war?
Idc either way, but I’m always amazed at how stupid these people volunteer to be.
And that nukes were indeed a reason for the war?
Idc either way, but I’m always amazed at how stupid these people volunteer to be.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:19 am to Average_Comments
Giving them back their own money, in return for nuclear disarmament?
HOME frickING RUN! So they get nothing and voluntarily disarmament themselves with a hollowed out military, navy, and spirit!
Plus, its now the regions mission to build pipelines NOT to use the strait
Here's a hint. If I steal your wallet, frick your wife, eat all your food, sell all your furniture and you become homeless.....you haven't won a fricking thing if I give you the house keys back and your wallet, with half the money in it.
Just so you know
HOME frickING RUN! So they get nothing and voluntarily disarmament themselves with a hollowed out military, navy, and spirit!
Plus, its now the regions mission to build pipelines NOT to use the strait
Here's a hint. If I steal your wallet, frick your wife, eat all your food, sell all your furniture and you become homeless.....you haven't won a fricking thing if I give you the house keys back and your wallet, with half the money in it.
Just so you know
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:24 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
If Iran does have uranium, does that mean the left has been lying this entire time?
And that nukes were indeed a reason for the war?
They certainly have uranium. That isn't in dispute. The dispute is over whether or not they were trying to develop nuclear bombs. The Trump admin is saying they had enriched their uranium to 60%, which is over the threshold needed for peaceful purposes, so therefore, they were obviously trying to develop nukes. The left denies this.
But again, I see the larger plot here revolving around where they got the uranium to begin with. Those "crazy Q tards" have been saying all along that the uranium from the Uranium One deal ended up in Iranian hands after being passed along to Russia.
It's going to end up turning out that Hillary and Barrack not only gave them 300 billion in cash, but also the material needed to build nuclear weapons. Mark it down.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 9:26 am
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:35 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
If we were planning to do this why not do it first? Would’ve saved a lot of money we spent blowing shite up for a month
More importantly, the lives of 13 of our soldiers.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:40 am to Average_Comments
Trump says no cash
quote:
The U.S.A. will get all Nuclear “Dust,” created by our great B2 Bombers - No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form. This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon, either, but the USA will, separately, work with Lebanon, and deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!! Thank you! President DJT
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:42 am to Average_Comments
you dont see a difference in what we asked for now vs then? 
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:43 am to ScottFowler
quote:
If their oil doesn't move, their wells will be lost for a decade.
Can you elaborate on this please? Serious question.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:45 am to Average_Comments
If we can simply print money to buy Uranium without any consequences, why wouldn’t we?
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:46 am to Average_Comments
I don’t see a problem. It’s not our money we are giving them. We are just unfreezing their assets if they give up the uranium and dismantle their nuclear program
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:47 am to Average_Comments
Are you stupid or something? You forget the 200mil in cash we flew over there?
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:55 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
Are you stupid or something? You forget the 200mil in cash we flew over there?
It was 4 Billion if I recall. And it wasn’t US taxpayer dollars or US printed money, it was 4B that Iran companies had earned that was stored in US banks, originally frozen assets that were part of ‘sanctions’, that Lord Obama ‘unfroze’ and returned.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:56 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
Trump says no cash
They're going to unfreeze some of the seized Iranian assets once they have turned over the uranium.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:59 am to Augustus516
quote:First, you are mixing metaphors. Obama paid Iran pallets of cash and a $1.7Billion total to settle a dispute whereby Iran had paid the US $400M for weapons in 1979, but after the Iranian revolution, the US never provided the weapons.
But when Obama unfroze their assets 10+ years ago
There were a half-dozen ways around that issue, not the least of which is the owed counterparty no longer existed.
Instead, Obama decided to pay not just "the frozen asset" at $400M, but also an additional $1.3B in interest.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News