- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/19/25 at 5:18 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
YOU think. Any mother would chose to save their child!
LOL
The biggest genocide in the history of humanity is women killing their own children simply for convenience.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:28 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
You are too dumb to realize you are making my exact point for me
*sigh*
Abortion is murder because it purposely ends a human life, the mother and the doctor intend to and succeed at causing death.
There is nothing "Potential" about a fetus's life.
Someone would make the decision to pull the plug on the woman, knowing that it will end the life of her child.
That is also murder.
Neither of these are a miscarriage.
I await your further foolishness.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 9:25 am to Narax
[
This is not relevant to the discussion.
You understand this woman is dead, right? Not like in a persistent vegetative state. But like, dead dead.
If you don’t think there is a difference between someone walking into a clinic to get an abortion, and someone who is dead, being allowed to…idk, be treated with the same dignity we treat everyone else in the hospital who is declared dead, then we’ll just have to agree to disagree then and move on.
I’m just glad enough people with more common sense understand this nuance. In your view, someone who has a stroke while driving and unfortunately kills someone is as morally abhorrent as someone who spends 3 months planning on how to kill his wife.
quote:
There is nothing "Potential" about a fetus's life.
This is not relevant to the discussion.
quote:
Someone would make the decision to pull the plug on the woman, knowing that it will end the life of her child.
You understand this woman is dead, right? Not like in a persistent vegetative state. But like, dead dead.
quote:
That is also murder.
If you don’t think there is a difference between someone walking into a clinic to get an abortion, and someone who is dead, being allowed to…idk, be treated with the same dignity we treat everyone else in the hospital who is declared dead, then we’ll just have to agree to disagree then and move on.
I’m just glad enough people with more common sense understand this nuance. In your view, someone who has a stroke while driving and unfortunately kills someone is as morally abhorrent as someone who spends 3 months planning on how to kill his wife.
This post was edited on 5/20/25 at 9:28 am
Posted on 5/20/25 at 5:12 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
This is not relevant to the discussion.
Of course it is relevant, it's just not helpful to your foolishness.
I doubt you are so dumb as to make that statement honestly.
quote:
You understand this woman is dead, right? Not like in a persistent vegetative state. But like, dead dead.
So a dead dead body has more rights than a living body?
quote:
If you don’t think there is a difference between someone walking into a clinic to get an abortion, and someone who is dead, being allowed to…idk, be treated with the same dignity we treat everyone else in the hospital who is declared dead, then we’ll just have to agree to disagree then and move on.
No, you are a fool, why does a dead body deserve dignity that requires intentionally killing a baby.
You don't get to say you are in favor of murdering Jews and move on.
People like you are disgusting.
quote:
In your view, someone who has a stroke while driving and unfortunately kills someone is as morally abhorrent as someone who spends 3 months planning on how to kill his wife.
Don't lie, I went out of my way to mention intent.
The driver had no intention to kill.
The doctor that pulls the plug intends to kill.
Someone who plans to kill his wife is the same as the doctor.
That's life.
That's death.
That's intentional cause of death.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 7:16 pm to 4cubbies
So God decided to kill this women and her child, and man decided to keep the child alive?`
Posted on 5/20/25 at 7:20 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I think the most dignified solution would be to allow them both to die a natural death and reunite in heaven.
Of course you think this, because you're an idiot.
If she's brain dead there is no "letting her die" as she is already dead. That's precisely why they're letting the body die, because the person (brain) is already dead.
There is absolutely nothing wrong, ethically or morally, in keeping a mere body alive to save another life.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 8:48 pm to nealnan8
quote:
nealnan8
I haven’t seen someone of your perspicacity in the area of theology since Stone Cold Steve Austin.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 8:52 pm to nealnan8
quote:
So God decided to kill this women and her child, and man decided to keep the child alive?`
Not a very deep thinker, I see.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 9:34 pm to Azkiger
quote:
That's precisely why they're letting the body die,
Who is letting the body die?
Posted on 5/20/25 at 10:00 pm to dgnx6
quote:
I guess she would have been cool with pulling the plug on her and killing her baby.
That stupid bitch would not think twice about kill her baby if it was convenient for her. She is a disgusting leftist ghoul who would celebrate killing her own baby
Posted on 5/20/25 at 10:10 pm to Jbird
quote:
The vast majority of this clowns threads are so she can get to the point where she says she hates white men.
She also likes to use the “small government conservative” line too
Posted on 5/20/25 at 10:20 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
onmymedicalgrind
The DEI doctor has made an appearance to support his leftist agenda
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:31 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Who is letting the body die?
Family or doctors, whoever has the legal authority to make the call.
Once the child is born, her body will be allowed to die. But her brain (who she is) is already dead (hence the determination "brain dead").
This scenario only involves one person, the baby.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:06 am to 4cubbies
Not shocked this braindead libtard wants a perfectly healthy baby to die so the mom can be with the baby in heaven. What a fricking moron...
Posted on 5/21/25 at 3:40 am to 4cubbies
[quote]You’re being incredibly emotional. I’m not advocating for abortion.[/quote
No one is emotional, you people look at other people as numbers and they aren’t. It’s really gross.
No one is emotional, you people look at other people as numbers and they aren’t. It’s really gross.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 6:22 am to 4cubbies
38 states have fetal homicide laws on the books, basically granting de facto personhood to the fetus...the definition of homicide is the killing of a person by another person. That adds a whole 'nother angle to the ethical questions here.
It also gives JD Vance the opportunity to box Gavin Newsom into a tight corner in 2028 and not let him out. In various states, the fetal homicide law may be manslaughter, or it may depend on the stage of pregnancy.
In California, it's felony murder at any stage of fetal development.
If a woman who is six months pregnant is on her way to the abortion clinic and has her 6 month old child in the car, and she's hit by a drunk driver, killing the 6 month old child and the 6 month old fetus, the DA can plead the driver down to vehicular homicide for the 6 month old child. Not for the fetus. He's getting a murder charge for the fetus. It's the only charge that the law allows. California state law gives greater protection to the fetus than to the toddler.
Explain that, Gavin Newsom. What is it about walking in the door of the clinic that robs the fetus of its personhood?
By the way...this actually happened. 6 murder charges, only 5 vehicular homicide charges. And liberal DA George Gascon actually referred to the fetus as a person.
It also gives JD Vance the opportunity to box Gavin Newsom into a tight corner in 2028 and not let him out. In various states, the fetal homicide law may be manslaughter, or it may depend on the stage of pregnancy.
In California, it's felony murder at any stage of fetal development.
If a woman who is six months pregnant is on her way to the abortion clinic and has her 6 month old child in the car, and she's hit by a drunk driver, killing the 6 month old child and the 6 month old fetus, the DA can plead the driver down to vehicular homicide for the 6 month old child. Not for the fetus. He's getting a murder charge for the fetus. It's the only charge that the law allows. California state law gives greater protection to the fetus than to the toddler.
Explain that, Gavin Newsom. What is it about walking in the door of the clinic that robs the fetus of its personhood?
By the way...this actually happened. 6 murder charges, only 5 vehicular homicide charges. And liberal DA George Gascon actually referred to the fetus as a person.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 6:49 am to 4cubbies
This podcast popped up on my Apple News.
I haven’t listened to it. But figured you may want to give it a go while your making bottles or something.
Apple News.
ETA - It’s more like a news headline.
I haven’t listened to it. But figured you may want to give it a go while your making bottles or something.
Apple News.
ETA - It’s more like a news headline.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 7:05 am
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News