- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Capping graduate loans to 150k
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:03 am to fareplay
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:03 am to fareplay
quote:... and it isn't now.
Medschool wasn’t 400k when you were school age
What was available were other mechanisms to pay for school for those of us who couldn't afford it.
For example, there were scholarships, RA/TA spots, etc. There were also programs allowing one to lever future worth as a doctor for a full ride through school. Payback in those programs was in years of service to the 'benefactor' once medical training was completed, i.e., a medical indentured servitude of sorts. Those programs are all still available today.
But you're right. Things were different then. When I was school age, we didn't have students whining about having to serve in the military, or in low income/needy areas for a period of time in exchange for attending med school debt free. That bit is an entirely new phenomenon.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:07 am to fareplay
Get rid of federal student loans altogether.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:09 am to SmackoverHawg
quote:Sounds like the medical field is not for you.
SmackoverHawg
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:26 am to fareplay
quote:
Ok there goes medschool for anyone without rich parents. Odd game we play in the US
Join the military, ROTC in college, if you have the grades after graduating then apply to med school. The military will pay for your medical school and training and will be paid back by serving 6 more years along with possible recall time and reserves. Debt free after that. How bad does someone want to become a doctor?
Posted on 7/4/25 at 4:45 am to fareplay
quote:
Also can we say giving 300k plus in private loans is just a worse solution?
No...we can't.
I, as a taxpayer, am not on the hook if you fail to pay a private loan back.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 5:18 am to Sofaking2
quote:Non-surgical. Surgical are 5-6yrs.
Most residencies are 3-4 years
quote:Not exactly.
After 10 years of working in a non profit, which most hospitals or clinics are, your government loans are forgiven.
During those 10yrs, you have to make "qualifying" loan repayments at a minimum 10-15% of discretionary income per month. Payments must be on time, and for the full amount required. After 120 qualifying payments, borrowers can apply for forgiveness. If approved, the remaining loan balance is forgiven.
So while PSLF might rate as a perk for working indigent settings, it certainly would not be a top standalone option for school financing.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 5:31 am to fareplay
quote:"Was"?
How much in federal loans did your MD wife take?
---
0 she was rich and her dad paid for it.
Then perhaps you could pursue being "unburdened by the past," as Kamala suggested?
Posted on 7/4/25 at 5:53 am to fareplay
How about medical schools offer those graduates the option of working off those loans? Graduate from LSU Shreveport or New Orleans then work for those schools/medical centers for 3 years and the school pays off 1/3 to 1/2 the student loans. They have endowments plus their medical hospitals are really for profit. They can pay new physician graduates plus part of their loans.
This post was edited on 7/4/25 at 5:54 am
Posted on 7/4/25 at 6:06 am to 4cubbies
quote:Indeed. But do you also understand there is a lot of risk involved for lenders with money printers? It's simply transferred to taxpayers.
I understand there is a lot of risk involved for lenders without money printers.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 6:33 am to ItTakesAThief
quote:
It also should be sending the message that schools raising tuition simply because subsidized government loans are available is a bad thing to allow to happen. The school gets all the free government money. The person who was overcharged for college has to pay it back. Or the government is left holding the bag. Only one profiting are the universities because there is an endless supply of cash through government loans and there are no consequences for the borrowers until they finish school or quit/fail out and realize what they have done.
This is step one in fixing the student loan crisis. And it is a crisis. Businesses have used college as free training for 30 years now. College costs have skyrocketed. And kids are saddled with life altering debt. And we don’t understand why kids aren’t getting married as early and aren’t buying homes.
It’s got to be fixed.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 7:48 am to fareplay
We should allow people to start their med degrees when they enter undergrad at 18. It would move the timeline up for everything by 4 years
Posted on 7/4/25 at 7:56 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Sounds like the medical field is not for you.
I'm doing fine. More than fine. I knew we'd probably seen our last raise when Obamacare passed. I'm just stating how unattractive it is to younger students. I was speaking of the "living wage" another poster had stated. Living costs are more when your never home and having to eat away from the house. You're also making life and social sacrifices that you can't put a number on. What I've seen over the last 20 years is a drastic decline in the overall quality of physicians at every level. As education has gotten more and more expensive, the quality of the training has fallen off. Even if you graduate more students, it doesn't help. They aren't used to working the hours, they are less knowledgeable on the whole, and half or more are now female. Females generally don't work full time and those that do don't see/produce what male counterparts do. What's happened in medicine is a functional shortage of doctors. There is no shortage of physicians, there is a shortage of physicians will to work full time or more for various reasons. The lower pay doesn't help. Not to mention very few physicians work for themselves anymore. They all end up employed to get loan payback and essentially get locked into a career of indebted service. the performance bonuses never flesh out so they do what most human do and work just enough to keep their jobs.
Sounds like the medical field isn't for me? I'm just saying what others are thinking. Another problem is that most doctors want to display a facade of wealth and success that simply doesn't exist. They are pissed off, burned out and cynical by age 40 if not sooner when they realize they are trapped into what appears to be a dead end field while they see former classmates with no college degree out earning them at the local refinery.
I'm not saying they can't succeed, but it's much, much harder than it was pre-Obama care and the reward is much smaller and further away. The most demoralizing thing is seeing how much more work has been placed on our backs by insurers over the last 20 years. Then you have hospital admins making more than any doctor in their system, running the facility in the ground because they know jack shite about medicine while they freeze wages or cut them.
I'd say the field is for me. I understand it and continue to thrive but I'm not going to sit back and say "all is good" when it clearly isn't. I'm set for life. I stand to benefit from the collapse of other clinics, but I hate what is happening to our health system overall. I see the end game and it isn't pretty. This train is going off the cliff and i'm about to jump clear. It's especially bad in red states as medicare re-imbursement is much lower than our blue state counterparts, especially in deep blue, highly populated voting centers. CMS has maps you can search by zip code. I encourage people to do their research and see how our taxes are funding healthcare in other states and cities.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:05 am to IMSA_Fan
quote:
We should allow people to start their med degrees when they enter undergrad at 18. It would move the timeline up for everything by 4 years
Or even sooner. You have to have a solid base in chemistry, mainly biochemistry but you have to work up to that and biology, but it could be streamlined starting in high school to be more specific to medical. Time value of money is more important than people realize. Currently, your going to be 30 before you can even consider starting to save to any significant degree. Even then, you're going to be swamped in debt unless you have rich parents or take a loan pay back offer that locks you into a low paying job for 4-10 years. It would also make longer specialties like neurosurgery more attractive to more students. Who wants to train until age 40? We need to overhaul the system from top to bottom. From education to insurance reform and patients need to be held more accountable for their poor life choices and non-compliance.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:09 am to LordSaintly
quote:
If enough people were paying them back, this wouldn’t be necessary.
True. All they need is a Biden to come along and decide to wipe the debts clean, and just ignore Supreme Court rulings.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:25 am to fareplay
quote:
You ever borrow 300k before? Remember what was the requirements? Now apply that to a 21 year old without money from parents / co-signer
Sounds like the acceptance letter better be good enough for the bank. If the schools feel good enough about the student then they can co-sign and/or up their scholarship giving game. Up their endowment alum collection campaigns.
In a nut shell, schools now have to focus on what they need to do to make them look good instead of forcing their med students to vow to be DEI marauders at graduation.
Stop whining about losing govt cheese, and donate to your fav med school to pay it forward. That's the true American way.
This post was edited on 7/4/25 at 8:27 am
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:28 am to fareplay
Or better, cap it at whatever rate the lender and the borrower would like to take without the possibility of a bail out.
It should be a loan to be paid back like any other.
It should be a loan to be paid back like any other.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:29 am to SmackoverHawg
quote:
a loan pay back offer that locks you into a low paying job for 4-10 years.
Are these programs like being a VA doc for a minimum number of years and they forgive the loan?
Posted on 7/4/25 at 9:02 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Are these programs like being a VA doc for a minimum number of years and they forgive the loan?
Yeah. But some can be longer for bigger loans. A lot of fault falls on some of the providers for living like kings as students. I lived like a peasant for 3 years. My wife was in pharmacy school and a year older than me, but we still scrimped and saved that year. We came out owing tuition only. Paid hers off first as mine was deferred at the time until I was 6 months into practice after finishing residency, with no accrued interest at that time. I negotiated a salary guaranteed with the local hospital. They guaranteed me $12k month income/ $12k for overhead and loan payback. They would subtract my collections and pay the difference up to those amounts. By the end of month 3, I was collecting enough to cover it all and then some. By not taking a more lucrative 3 year employment package, I bet on myself and won. Since they had to pay so little and my loan amount was only $34k, corporate decided it wasn't worth the paper work and legal fees each year for five years and called it even at the end of the first year. Plus, they knew I was staying in the area. So, I went to med school for free not even counting scholarships I won for being top of my class in GPA for 2 of the 3 years we are graded and awards in specific subjects. I had also banked excess scholarship money from college for room and board/books. I was allowed to live off campus due to a housing shortage. I shared a 3 bedroom trailer with 2 friends. $100/month rent and utilities. I got $2500 cash/semester for room/board. So, I spent as little as possible and banked that, while working when I could. Science degrees make it tougher to work due to unusual lab times and earlier morning starts for some of the classes.
So there are ways to get some or all of it paid back that don't lock you in, but you have to be a go getter and not take the bigger up front carrot.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 9:04 am to SmackoverHawg
quote:Me thinks you might be full of Bovine Excrement. Hope you stay in your blue democrat cess pool. We don't want your kind in a Great Red Area.
SmackoverHawg
Posted on 7/4/25 at 9:07 am to fareplay
Maybe we only grant loans at all for jobs that are in demand/short supply ?? Spend the money for kids to get their MD rather than women’s studies? Zero loans for bullshite degrees. Or what if loans were treated like investments by doing a basic rate of return calculation on average salary 5-10 years out. If it’s less than the loan amount, application denied.
This post was edited on 7/4/25 at 9:08 am
Popular
Back to top



0





