Started By
Message

re: Canadian Push to Legalize ALL Drugs

Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:51 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260576 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:51 am to

quote:

Right. Because most heroin addicts are financially stable people that can pick up and move at any time.


Addicts are incredibly mobile. Many don't have homes and just move from couch to couch. The local ones involved in other crimes are hard to find because they all have this network they're associated with.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25004 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:51 am to
Not sure how I feel about this. I'm all for legalizing marijuana across the board, but it's a far jump from marijuana to heroin. I'd be concerned about an increase in the number of addicts and the toll that would take on an already burdened healthcare system. This is one area in which I'm conflicted about government intervention versus personal liberties.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41130 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:18 am to
Good move. Prohibition doesn't work anyway.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I'd be concerned about an increase in the number of addicts and the toll that would take on an already burdened healthcare system. This is one area in which I'm conflicted about government intervention versus personal liberties.



Carte Blanche drug legalization must be accompanied by policy which states that government resources will not be expended to treat or support drug addicts.

Can't have small government policies to decriminalize extremely addicting substances, while simultaneously having big government assistance programs available. The two will cause positive feedback in each other:

>People know they will be taken care of if they get addicted to heroin
>People more likely to carelessly use heroin
>More people addicted to heroin
>Increased burden on assistance programs
>More money spent on assistance programs
>wash rinse repeat


I consider myself a "small government libertarian", however as long as we are handing out tax dollars to treat drug addicts, then unfortunately I can't support decriminalization of hard drugs. I would prefer we stop spending tax dollars on drug treatment, but we all know that isn't going to happen.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30026 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:22 am to
quote:

I support this. Let Darwin clean up the gene pool.


i lean that way as well but i still think things like cocaine, heroin, and meth, should stay illegal because they are highly addictive and can kill you
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162230 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:23 am to
quote:


Not to mention Canada has Common Sense Immigration Laws that require a person have a job/finances to not only support themselves but contribute to the Nation at large, as well as some other stuff like a basic sustainable lifestyle plan.

Yeah I don't even know if you can get in with a DUI charge
Posted by TexasTiger80
Texas
Member since Apr 2018
2396 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:24 am to
Canada...were libtards go to O.D. and die.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162230 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Addicts are incredibly mobile.

Do you think a heroin addict in Alexandria, LA would be motivated to move to Canada?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95633 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:26 am to
Illegal immigration.

Cross over into Canada on a tourist visa and disappear, then buy a government ID that will get you on various programs.


This has already been perfected by numerous other cultures but Canada typically doesn’t have to worry about Americans not wanting to leave.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51628 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Right. Because most heroin addicts are financially stable people that can pick up and move at any time.


Slaves couldn't afford train rides to the North prior to the Civil War but many made it out regardless. You think all the homeless on the streets of San Fran (for example) are from that area?

Where there's a will, there's a way.

Heroin is a bit of an extreme example but I was using it only as it was the one the prior poster used, it could not only apply to any highly addictive drug but also people that gateway their way up to it (no one starts at the heroin level).

My point in this is that there will be unexpected outcomes and an influx of addicts and/or potential addicts who then stay in numbers enough to strain the Canadian system is a very real possibility and anyone not at least looking at it has their head in the sand.

In that same vein though the long periods of cold weather there could well end up being an eventual deterrent if/when Darwinism takes strong hold (ex: people dying due to exposure from there not being enough room in homeless shelters).

Conversely, the influx of monies and relaxing of regulations could spur new and more effective addiction treatments.

These and other possible outcomes are what I find interesting and why I would be watching this, if the law passed. We haven't had this sort of freedom in the West during the era of modern, more addictive (and more potent) drugs. The avenues and paths Canadian society could go down are many, varied and make for a great social Petri dish.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51628 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:36 am to
quote:

So how does this work? Are they going to legalize the use of meth?


Apparently so. Anything and everything would be legal.

quote:

Are you going to be able to buy them over the counter like candy?


If it's legal to do, I can't see why it wouldn't be legal to sell.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51628 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Do you think a heroin addict in Alexandria, LA would be motivated to move to Canada?



I know one that was motivated to move from Alexandria to Minneapolis (and then eventually moved back after many years). Does that count for at least partial credit?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 8:46 am
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27070 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:39 am to
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Are you going to be able to buy them over the counter like candy?

My guess is that there's going to be licensing and permit fees attached to the ability to sell and not every outlet will be an eligible vendor.

Then again it's Canada, so who knows.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51628 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Easy solution. Don't subsidize drug addiction therapy if you legalize drugs. Do drugs at your own risk. Of course, this is too reasonable and would have a fat chance of being implemented.


I can't agree with this enough. If this is how they end up handling it, it will make for a fascinating experiment in social behavior when unfettered addiction is allowed but not supported. My hope is that after an initial spike in use/abuse/addiction, the "new" factor would eventually wear off and use/abuse/addiction would die down as the prohibition taboo fades into the past.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260576 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Do you think a heroin addict in Alexandria, LA would be motivated to move to Canada?


If it means cheaper and more accessible product, absolutely.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20895 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Because most heroin addicts are financially stable people that can pick up and move at any time.


The heroin addicts you read about in the news are smaller than the whole population.

Thats like saying only people that get dwis drink.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:54 am to
quote:

What I am interested most in seeing is the long-term effects (say 10-20 years down the road) of full legalization.
lowered incarceration, lower rate of crime, more tax revenue, better education programs. i'm sure i'm leaving some stuff out.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260576 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

My guess is that there's going to be licensing and permit fees attached to the ability to sell and not every outlet will be an eligible vendor.


It appears it's going to be simply decriminalization, not legalization. They will allow doctors to prescribe heroin in case of severe addiction though.
Posted by Dr_Tim_Whatley
Member since Jun 2014
428 posts
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:00 am to
I like it. It has worked very well for Portugal. They've seen a decrease in overdose and underage use.

For the most part, people who choose to not do drugs choose to not do so because they're a risk to your health, not because they're illegal.

Legality has never been a good deterrent for drugs. Educate people on the harmful effects, and from there its simple self responsibility
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 9:01 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram