- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
His name has been floated as a possible candidate
I don't think he is interested though
I don't think he is interested though
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:13 am to Powerman
quote:
Especially if Mark Z runs for president
Please let this happen
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:16 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Please let this happen
It would make for quality entertainment
And it would put facebook under an insane amount of scrutiny and that can only be a good thing IMO
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:18 am to Powerman
quote:
It would make for quality entertainment
Trump vs Zuck debates would be all time
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:33 am to Powerman
quote:
So it's companies like this that Jjdoc is whining about being bullied by social media outlets?
This and PragerU on YouTube.
PragerU has some videos that were placed under the "restricted content" umbrella based on viewer feedback that the video content/topic was inappropriate for younger children.
Thing is, the only people this affects are people that opted in to have their content filtered.
So I guess that counts as censorship if you consider the movie and video game rating system censorship as well.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:40 am to Green Chili Tiger
Now the media is trying to paint this as a story of Trump campaign using illegal hacked data to manipulate voters.
Muh Facebook
Facebook will do everything they can to keep this from being investigated. They do not want the public aware of what they are collecting and who they are selling that info to. It would blow most people's minds.
Muh Facebook
Facebook will do everything they can to keep this from being investigated. They do not want the public aware of what they are collecting and who they are selling that info to. It would blow most people's minds.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
People like OP don't care about the overarching issues because all they are worried about is feeding their Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:44 am to Damone
quote:
People like OP don't care about the overarching issues because all they are worried about is feeding their Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Uh no
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:46 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:The Federal Government of the United States of America would like to up vote this post....but unfortunately they dont know who you are or where you post.
and what may be among the largest abuses of personal data in U.S. history
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:49 am to Powerman
From what I read over the weekend, Facebook is in major CYA mode as they knew about the mishandling of the data a LONG time ago, and also knew the data wasn't deleted then, and did little then. They're only acting now because this Chris Wylie guy is speaking out. They've also suspended Wylie's FB page.
This seems like a MUCH bigger story than the McCabe firing. This lady gets to the heart of it.
emptywheel blog
This seems like a MUCH bigger story than the McCabe firing. This lady gets to the heart of it.
emptywheel blog
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:03 am to The Spleen
quote:
This seems like a MUCH bigger story than the McCabe firing
Hahahaha
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:09 am to Powerman
quote:
So it's companies like this that Jjdoc is whining about being bullied by social media outlets?
No Mr. "No such thing as Electrical Steel" it's not.
JJDOC is complaining about them banning candidates like this one:
Bans GOP senate candidate
Changes in their algorithm has crushed conservative voices and has reduced their visibility. That's issue number 1!
Second, what they are doing will put them before congress and in front of parliament in the UK.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:11 am to Powerman
quote:
If you read the article they went beyond that and mined data from people that didn't give app permissions
FB did the same thing! Illegally. You will see the CEO in front of congress!
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:19 am to Powerman
quote:
But reality is far from the narrative that some here want it to be
Routinely suppressed conservatives
Facebooks algorithms are responsible and most likely a reaction to the silly Russian mania
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:21 am to Jjdoc
quote:
JJDOC is complaining about them banning candidates like this one:
Bans GOP senate candidate
You mean candidates that repeatedly violate the terms of service by raffling off guns on their facebook page?
quote:
“This is the second time my personal account has been banned from Facebook due to my campaign raffling off a perfectly legal firearm,”
quote:
I demand an explanation from Facebook’s leadership
quote:
“As we explain in our Community Standard on our web site, we prohibit any attempts by private individuals to purchase, sell, gift or trade firearms,” he wrote. ”Firearm shops and online retailers can discuss sales of firearms and firearm parts as long as they comply with all applicable laws and regulations and follow our advertising policies should they look to advertise on Facebook.
“Further, in any case where we remove content, we send the person or page admin(istrator) a note explaining that something was removed due to a violation of our Community Standards. Only after multiple such removals and notices would an account receive a temporary block.”
You also failed to note that it was his personal facebook page that was suspended(The one that was raffling off a gun), not his campaign page (The one that was not raffling off a gun).
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 9:53 am
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:23 am to IllegalPete
quote:
Facebook will do everything they can to keep this from being investigated
It's an overreaction to the Russian hysteria. The left is bat shite crazy
The Atlantic- How The Left Lost Its Mind
quote:
The most prolific of the conspiracy-mongers tend to focus on the Russia scandal, weaving a narrative so sensationalistic and complex that it could pass for a Netflix political drama. Theirs is a world where it is acceptable to allege that hundreds of American politicians, journalists, and government officials are actually secret Russian agents; that Andrew Breitbart was murdered by Vladimir Putin; that the Kremlin has “kompromat” on everyone, and oh-by-the-way a presidency-ending sex tape is going to drop any day now.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:33 am to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
You also failed to note that it was his personal facebook page that was suspended(The one that was raffling off a gun), not his campaign page (The one that was not raffling off a gun).
I didn't fail to do anything. He was banned for a perfectly LEGAL thing.
He's not the only one either. They didn't ban your boy Ellison. They also allow Farrakhan speeches where he calls Jews Satan and calls for the death of whites.
Take your BS elsewhere.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:41 am to Jjdoc
quote:
He was banned for a perfectly LEGAL thing.
He violated the terms of service. Twice.
Just because it's legal to raffle off a gun, doen't mean you get to do it on facebook.
quote:
They didn't ban your boy Ellison.
I don't know who this is. Did he hold a gun raffle? Twice?
quote:
They also allow Farrakhan speeches where he calls Jews Satan and calls for the death of whites.
I wouldn't know. I've never had a facebook account. Do you have a link?
Posted on 3/19/18 at 12:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and if you want proof, look at all the slobbering that was given to Obama's data operations in 2012. no way that was 100% kosher to be that effective (unless FB was illegally giving them the data directly
Funny you say that...
quote:
A former Obama campaign official is claiming that Facebook knowingly allowed them to mine massive amounts of Facebook data — more than they would’ve allowed someone else to do — because they were supportive of the campaign.
Popular
Back to top




1










