Started By
Message

re: Brian Kemp admits voting machines can be hacked.

Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:08 am to
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79634 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.


You get dumber by the post
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119458 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Lol remember when the CIA blew up the car his daughter's BF was in right as Trump was gaining traction with Kemp in the post-election recount scrum?


I think the kid’s name was Harrison Deal.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22158 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Nor their Ronbot comrades


Ok Jussie.
Posted by newmexicotiger
Member since Sep 2017
2413 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:24 am to
Kemp is bought and paid for. That's why the progs let him win as opposed to installing gap tooth.
Posted by RBTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
7803 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:03 pm to
BUMP

LINK
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:30 pm to
This was the Trump team approach. Claim "ineligible voters could have voted". "Voting machines could have been hacked". And that's why they failed in their challenges. They need to show it *DID* happen. Not could have. Any gun owner *could* be a murder. Doesn't mean we can throw them in jail for it.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2326 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.


Like the Trump team did in Coffee county?
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2326 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Also, iirc that famous pic of people putting sheets up to cover windows were to prevent poll watchers from looking in.


You do not recall correctly. The windows in Detroit were being blocked because Trump supporters were gathering outside to intimidate the poll workers and some of them were taking pictures of the count (only media members may take pics to protect voter information)

The poll watchers were still inside, not part of the crowd gathering outside.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
13302 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

The windows in Detroit were being blocked because Trump supporters were gathering outside to intimidate the poll workers


Yeah I’m sure a bunch of Trump supporters showed up in Detroit to intimidate the dindu nuffins. About as believable as two white supremacists in MAGA hats in Chicago attacking Jussie.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18183 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Nor their Ronbot comrades

Says the guy supporting the liberal Republican in the primary.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35043 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

You do not recall correctly. The windows in Detroit were being blocked because Trump supporters were gathering outside to intimidate the poll workers and some of them were taking pictures of the count (only media members may take pics to protect voter information) The poll watchers were still inside, not part of the crowd gathering outside.


You can’t seriously believe the wall of stupidity that you wrote.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2326 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

You can’t seriously believe the wall of stupidity that you wrote.


It's not a wall, just a paragraph.

And, yes, I will believe it until someone produces credible evidence to the contrary.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35043 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

And, yes, I will believe it until someone produces credible evidence to the contrary.


How about evidence as to what you claim? And I said evidence, not a “news” story from Pravda.
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3058 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?


Clearly, you don't know squat about voting machines, nitwit.
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3058 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Of course electronic voting machines can be compromised.

It was just a few short years ago when several high profile Dim politicians were expressing their concerns about electronic voting machines, then the 2020 GE happened and it appears these same Dim politicians are no longer concerned.



It was Amy Klobuchar that called for the Senate hearings in 2018 & sent letters in 2019 to Dominion, ES&S, & Hart Civic. Liz Warren, Mark Warner, et al got in on the act as well.

I took the liberty of retrieving some quotes from the hypocrites...

“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”

“Many of the claims being asserted about Dominion and questionable voting technology is misinformation at best and, in many cases, they’re outright disinformation”

“According to voting machine testing and certification from the Election Assistance Commission, most voting machines contain software from firms which were alleged to have shared their source code with Russian entities,”

“We are deeply concerned that such reviews may have presented an opportunity for Russian intelligence agents looking to attack or hack the United States’ elections infrastructure. Further, if such vulnerabilities are not quickly examined and mitigated, future elections will also remain vulnerable to attack”

“Although each of your companies has a combination of older legacy machines and newer systems, vulnerabilities in each present a problem for the security of our democracy and they must be addressed”

“It is, in my view, inexcusable that our democracy depends on such hackable voter technology made by a handful of companies that have been able to evade oversight and, in fact, have actually been stonewalling the Congress for years”

“have no choice but to use insecure voting machines that make hackers and hostile foreign governments salivate.”


1. Have you shared your source code or any other sensitive data related to your voting machines or other products with any Russian entity?
2. To your knowledge, has any of the software that runs on your products been shared with any Russian entity?
3. What steps have you taken or will you take in order to upgrade existing technologies in light of the increased threat against our elections?




Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14286 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Machines that weren’t sealed were used. Machines whose certification had lapsed for years were used. Machines that didn’t meet the standards for certification were employed.

Link?
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2326 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

How about evidence as to what you claim? And I said evidence, not a “news” story from Pravda.


I don't know which sources you consider "Pravda", but here is a Nov. 6 article from the Detroit Free Press describing the chaos of election day, and how there were way too many poll watchers in the room causing chaos. The article does not just focus on that one photo, but the entire day.

Detroit Free Press

This would be considered evidence in a court of law, as it is a contemporaneous news article.

You're turn.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35043 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

the Detroit Free Press


=

quote:

"Pravda"


You quoting their (false) narrative is not surprising. It’s what leftists do…lie.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79634 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

You're turn.


This thread is about Georgia and their cheating ways. Please try and stay on topic.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12357 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:15 pm to
The election was not stolen by voting machines. It was stolen by Democrats who cast votes for people who chose not to vote.

This is enabled by:
1. Automatic voter registration when getting a drivers license or any type of benefit program.

2. Real time data provided to each side on who voted so the Democrats know who chose not to vote.

Going back to making people actually fill out a post card to register to vote and not releasing the data on who voted until after the vote is counted will stop this but now that is racist.

This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 1:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram