
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brennan "Grand Conspiracy Case" News
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If there are violation of law, they should follow proper procedure and not engage in big brain retardation by trying to create a GTOE to get venue in a sympathetic jurisdiction or to try to get around SOL limitations.
Seriously? You are going with this argument? This is sad even for you.
quote:
Trying to file the indictment for that in Florida? Retarded.
Are you retarded?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:48 pm to Warboo
quote:
Seriously? You are going with this argument? This is sad even for you.
Yes, I am going for the intelligent and rational argument. Not the one based on fantasies and fueled by emotions (see post immediately before your post)
quote:
Are you retarded?
Incredibly intelligent.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Incredibly intelligent.
Pahahahaha!!!
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:01 pm to Madking
Your posts are as accurate as Sam Leavitt's passes
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:03 pm to BoarEd
If they would step away from this bullshite there are dozens of other crimes he has committed but I guess we will have to ask our masters in Israel is that’s ok
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:16 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Assume Brennan is a consultant to the National Football League and the B10 Replay Booth
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh my...have a special one on the line
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, I am going for the intelligent and rational argument
You nor I know the details of this case so how would you or I know whether your take is intelligent or rational? Here is a hint councilor, you have know clue.
quote:
Incredibly intelligent.
Incredibly arrogant and incredibly losing when it comes to common sense and law. It is actually pretty funny going through your post history and the amount of pivots. Good luck chief. Lake Charles deserves you.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:29 pm to Warboo
quote:
You nor I know the details of this case
We know a LOT of the potential allegations in this case.
Meuller, Durham, Congressional reports. cases/litigation, etc.
This stuff has all be covered, discussed, litigated, etc.
The only act that seems to have any nexus with this district is the MAL raid in summer 2022. The vast majority of the acts occurred in the DC district.
quote:
It is actually pretty funny going through your post history and the amount of pivots.
...wut
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
You don’t even know how to tie cleats ya cuck
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is exactly the kind of BS that people consistently bring up. You have absolutely zero idea what the prosecution has and doesn't have. You can go back and look at what's public and assume, all of those docs will be used, but you don't know one way or another if that's 5% or 95% of what they have.
It's ridiculous. You've already ran the simulation in your head before anything even comes out.
That's not a good spot to be in.
I fully understand why people just ignore you. Pointless to engage.
It's ridiculous. You've already ran the simulation in your head before anything even comes out.
That's not a good spot to be in.
I fully understand why people just ignore you. Pointless to engage.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:41 pm to Bronco11
He is the linchpin. Nothing more. Get him in the cross hairs and make him roll to avoid 20 years
The reality is these shits on the Dem side took Nixon’s play book and flipped it when Clinton got in the WH. Obama was gasoline. Everything became a political game. Power power power. Same as Nixon. Put 6-8 in jail and it changes.
The reality is these shits on the Dem side took Nixon’s play book and flipped it when Clinton got in the WH. Obama was gasoline. Everything became a political game. Power power power. Same as Nixon. Put 6-8 in jail and it changes.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:50 pm to Bronco11
quote:
You have absolutely zero idea what the prosecution has
But we do. There have been MULTIPLE investigations already, MULTIPLE lawsuits with discovery, MULTIPLE prosecutions with records.
This is where you're getting into fantasy land. You're pretending like we have no idea about anything and just have to "Trust Sessions" out of copium, yet somehow you think, given that paradigm, this is a topic worth discussing? How does that even work?
If we don't know anything, and can't use any historical data, then what are you using to discuss this, exactly?
quote:
You've already ran the simulation in your head before anything even comes out.
I read the Meuller reprot you can too
I read chunks of the Durham report you can too
I read chunks of the Senate Report on Russian interference you can too
I read Judge Cannon's ruling on the legal search warrant for MAL you can too
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Is this the same thread you posted in a dozen times before 6 AM?
I think it is, but all your tripe sounds the same.
If it is, you must love Brennan.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 11:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
That's ridiculous. We had a complete blank slate regarding what to look for coming out of 2016. Nunes got saddled with an ethics complaint when he started asking questions. Then, they had to build an entire portfolio regarding the Russian BS with Haspel running the CIA. When she was the fricking station chief in london. Brutal. Throw in some covid and Christopher wray blocking everything for those 4 years and you have next to nothing by way of evidence.
Then, you get 4 years of Biden and a weaponized DOJ. In reality they had very little to go on compared to what they have now.
The fact you think you've seen a lot of the evidence up to this point is ignorant.
You have zero idea, nada, on what they have. And don't tie me to that that BS Q shite, I was never there and I'm not there now. You pass off your perceived interpretation as fact when you me and some larper in a basement knows about the situation.
It's incredibly wild you think you've seen it all. None of us have.
Stick to your venue argument, best ya got.
Then, you get 4 years of Biden and a weaponized DOJ. In reality they had very little to go on compared to what they have now.
The fact you think you've seen a lot of the evidence up to this point is ignorant.
You have zero idea, nada, on what they have. And don't tie me to that that BS Q shite, I was never there and I'm not there now. You pass off your perceived interpretation as fact when you me and some larper in a basement knows about the situation.
It's incredibly wild you think you've seen it all. None of us have.
Stick to your venue argument, best ya got.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 6:08 am to Bronco11
quote:
That's ridiculous. We had a complete blank slate regarding what to look for coming out of 2016. Nunes got saddled with an ethics complaint when he started asking questions. Then, they had to build an entire portfolio regarding the Russian BS with Haspel running the CIA. When she was the fricking station chief in london. Brutal. Throw in some covid and Christopher wray blocking everything for those 4 years and you have next to nothing by way of evidence.
Then, you get 4 years of Biden and a weaponized DOJ. In reality they had very little to go on compared to what they have now.
The fact you think you've seen a lot of the evidence up to this point is ignorant.
You have zero idea, nada, on what they have. And don't tie me to that that BS Q shite, I was never there and I'm not there now. You pass off your perceived interpretation as fact when you me and some larper in a basement knows about the situation.
It's incredibly wild you think you've seen it all. None of us have.
Stick to your venue argument, best ya got.
Will you agree that what we do know here in the public sphere right now is not enough to carry a “grand” conspiracy case?
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 7:00 am
Posted on 9/22/26 at 9:17 am to boosiebadazz
So here’s a *very* interesting nugget that I have not seen reported or discussed anywhere. The Chief Judge of Southern District of Florida issued an administrative order on October 25, 2025, setting duty judge assignments for all of 2026 for West Palm Beach and Fort Pierce.
LINK
Enter our good friend Mike Davis who was more than happy to start publicly discussing that the purpose of setting up this grand jury in Fort Pierce was to get the case in front of Eileen Cannon. Davis spoke to the NYT about this in an article that appeared in the Sunday NYT on November 23, 2025.
*The very next day* Judge Altonaga issued an Amended Duty Judge Assignment Schedule in Fort Pierce.
LINK
Doh!
So Cannon has had to alternate with Liebowitz every month this year. Thanks Mike Davis!
quote:
FORT PIERCE ASSIGNMENTS: January-December 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon
LINK
Enter our good friend Mike Davis who was more than happy to start publicly discussing that the purpose of setting up this grand jury in Fort Pierce was to get the case in front of Eileen Cannon. Davis spoke to the NYT about this in an article that appeared in the Sunday NYT on November 23, 2025.
quote:
The U.S. attorney, Jason A. Reding Quiñones, a Trump loyalist, has already been using a grand jury in Miami to subpoena former officials involved in an intelligence assessment that concluded Russia was trying to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election. He has not said why he is putting an extra grand jury 130 miles away in Judge Cannon’s courthouse.
But Mike Davis, a conservative legal activist and lawyer who is close to Mr. Reding Quiñones, has suggested that the purpose is to ensure that Judge Cannon will have a hand in any legal issues about the inquiry.
If that is the case, it would put Judge Cannon in charge of disputes like requests by recipients of subpoenas to quash them, on grounds ranging from an expired statute of limitations to claims of privilege, or requests by prosecutors to compel such witnesses to testify under threat of being jailed for contempt of court.
quote:
Justice Department officials are prohibited from talking about grand jury matters. But Mr. Davis, who has been a leading proponent of a “grand conspiracy” investigation into those who scrutinized Mr. Trump, has become vocal on social media and television in making a connection between Judge Cannon and the investigation.
In an interview, Mr. Davis said that he had been calling for a grand jury investigation in Fort Pierce to investigate whether there was a conspiracy to violate Mr. Trump’s civil rights, and that he had also worked to persuade the White House to appoint Mr. Reding Quiñones to his role.
“I’m very pleased that he has successfully got the court to agree to this grand jury in Fort Pierce,” he continued. “To these lawfare Democrats, I say, ‘Lawyer up.’”
*The very next day* Judge Altonaga issued an Amended Duty Judge Assignment Schedule in Fort Pierce.
quote:
FORT PIERCE ASSIGNMENTS: January 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon February 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz March 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon
April 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz
May 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon
June 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz
July 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon
August 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz
September 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon October 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz November 2026 Judge Aileen M. Cannon December 2026 Judge David S. Leibowitz
LINK
Doh!
So Cannon has had to alternate with Liebowitz every month this year. Thanks Mike Davis!
Posted on 9/22/26 at 9:22 am to cajunangelle
Sadly nothing will happen. I sure wish it would tho as he’s a complete POS. They’re all above the law.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 9:25 am to Decatur
Posted on 9/22/26 at 9:26 am to Bronco11
quote:
. We had a complete blank slate regarding what to look for coming out of 2016.
Nobody is arguing differently. I'm talking about now. It's 2026. 10 years later.
quote:
Then, they had to build an entire portfolio regarding the Russian BS with Haspel running the CIA. When she was the fricking station chief in london. Brutal. Throw in some covid and Christopher wray blocking everything for those 4 years and you have next to nothing by way of evidence.
Now we're up to 2020. I'm talking about 2026.
quote:
Then, you get 4 years of Biden and a weaponized DOJ.
What does this have to do with what we know now, in September 2026, about these cases?
quote:
The fact you think you've seen a lot of the evidence up to this point is ignorant.
I cited the relevant documents that have covered all of this in depth. You did not address them at all.
quote:
You have zero idea, nada, on what they have.
I just posted thousands of pages that say otherwise.
quote:
. And don't tie me to that that BS Q shite,
I'm not. I literally posted links for you to read. Official government documents. Nothing to do with Q.

Popular
Back to top


1








