1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brennan "Grand Conspiracy Case" News
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again....how?
It sounds like maybe you should pose your questions to the prosecutor who will be prosecuting this case. You know, the very things you've been saying won't happen.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:58 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
But give me something, dammit. Brennan aeemed less arrogant ...as I could slap Nicole Wallace silly.
That scene was set to show him as normal while she laughed at the claim. Yep, it is called a program for a reason.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:00 pm to cajunangelle
In discovery a lot of time people say something that comes back around and bites them.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:04 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You know, the very things you've been saying won't happen.
Dishonest as always
I never said the admin won't do something stupid. I just said it's stupid
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:06 pm to Gifman
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Isn’t Brennan kind of your boyfriend ?
SFPLC is hoping that Jack Smith doesn't read this board. He's Slo Mo Fo's #1 crush.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Bull frickin shite. As always. You claimed these connections won't be made due to "5 degrees of separation" and all sorts of other stupid shite. Everyone knows it.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:09 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It sounds like the new development on this is that Brennan's lawyer confirms Brennan is being looked at for issues much broader than just the Mar-a-Lago case and the lying to Congress stuff. That he is a subject in the so-called "grand conspiracy case" and that the narrower issues such as the lying to Congress thing could potentially be dovetailed into the broader conspiracy case as overt acts of said conspiracy.
SFP will be along to scoff shortly.
Lying under oath at a Congressional hearing should have netted this Bureaucratic State Skunk 5-10 years in prison.......minimum. Same could be said with Fauci, Comey, Wray, Strzok, Hilldawg, Rosenstein, Clinesmith, etc.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:11 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Brennan always goes to MSDNC and Nicole Wallace. How has MSNBC not been taken off the air for being à CIA tentacle?
No longer MSDNC....rebranded to BSNOW.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:13 pm to KCT
quote:
SFPLC is hoping that Jack Smith doesn't read this board. He's Slo Mo Fo's #1 crush.
I don't particularly like Jack Smith, either
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:13 pm to Timeoday
Well yeah duh, she was cued to laugh when Brennan said Obama's name. As if it was nuts and black jesus has full immunity from being POTUS and the first black jesus president.
But...him saying Obama's name is a first. He did a twofer. Made the claims seem absurd, while insinuating if he goes down for anything Obama will be named and cover his arse with immunity executive privilege.
But...him saying Obama's name is a first. He did a twofer. Made the claims seem absurd, while insinuating if he goes down for anything Obama will be named and cover his arse with immunity executive privilege.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:14 pm to Decatur
quote:
It sounds like the new development on this is that Brennan's lawyer confirms Brennan is being looked at for issues much broader than just the Mar-a-Lago case and the lying to Congress stuff. That he is a subject in the so-called "grand conspiracy case"
The Mar a Lago case is the same thing as the conspiracy case.
Right on brother!
Now let's administer some accountability and justice to the Bureaucratic State rat bastards who tried to remove a duly elected president from office.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:14 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You claimed these connections won't be made
Actually made? Yes.
Alleged? Like I said, I expect the admin to act stupidly here, so attempting these allegations falls into that bucket.
You're engaging in a straw man here.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:16 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
State rat bastards who tried to remove a duly elected president from office.
When did this happen?
Trump was impeached twice, but was never under threat of removal. And those 2 impeachments have nothing to do with the GTOE. One was about Ukraine and one was about J6. Neither have anything to do with Russiagate, MAL, etc.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:16 pm to Bass Tiger
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
Don't give us that stupid shite. For months you've been trying to get posters here to make a connection between all of these events knowing full well that nobody here is actually working the case. The implication you have presented for months is that none of this would happen. And now that it is you're shifting your stance. As usual.
It went from, "the thought of this happening is absurd and I challenge you, random person on the internet, to explain how we get from point A to B", to "well yeah, getting from point A to B is the easy part. Where it's going to fail is going from B to C."
You have no room to accuse anyone else of dishonesty. You're the most disingenuous damn hack there is around here. At least with the other retards they display their retardation openly. You crouch it behind being too much of a frickin coward to ever actually SAY anything yourself, except for when it's time to shift what you have been implying all along.
It went from, "the thought of this happening is absurd and I challenge you, random person on the internet, to explain how we get from point A to B", to "well yeah, getting from point A to B is the easy part. Where it's going to fail is going from B to C."
You have no room to accuse anyone else of dishonesty. You're the most disingenuous damn hack there is around here. At least with the other retards they display their retardation openly. You crouch it behind being too much of a frickin coward to ever actually SAY anything yourself, except for when it's time to shift what you have been implying all along.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:quote:
State rat bastards who tried to remove a duly elected president from office.
When did this happen?
Trump was impeached twice, but was never under threat of removal.
And it is simply not possible to be any more retarded than this right here.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Impeachment is by its nature a direct threat of removal.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:22 pm to BoarEd
quote:
For months you've been trying to get posters here to make a connection between all of these events knowing full well that nobody here is actually working the case.
Also because trying to make the connections would make someone look retarded.
It's using absurdity as a tool to show how silly people believing in this is.
quote:
The implication you have presented for months is that none of this would happen.
No. The implication is that this is retarded.
If the Trump admin wants to look retarded, again, it wouldn't be shocking.
Serious prosecutors keep leaving this investigation because they see it all and go "OK this is too retarded" and leave.
quote:
, "the thought of this happening is absurd and I challenge you, random person on the internet, to explain how we get from point A to B", to "well yeah, getting from point A to B is the easy part. Where it's going to fail is going from B to C."
Going from point A to B is still difficult to the point of impossible. Hence why it's retarded
Hence why my last post explained to you the difference in proving it and alleging it. Anyone can allege any craziness. Doesn't mean it has value or is possible.
quote:
You crouch it behind being too much of a frickin coward to ever actually SAY anything yourself,
Says the guy who won't even try to connect these dots
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:22 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Impeachment is by its nature a direct threat of removal.
And the impeachments had nothing to do with anything alleged to be part of the GTOE
Posted on 9/21/26 at 3:23 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Impeachment is by its nature a direct threat of removal.
He knows this of course. Now he has moved on to openly retarded and full-on lying.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News