- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: Trump directs FCC to implement Executive Order Preventing Online Censorship
Posted on 7/29/20 at 7:37 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 7/29/20 at 7:37 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Exactly 
0
Posted on 7/29/20 at 7:52 pm to xGeauxLSUx
Thank you John “Cuck” Roberts!
Posted on 7/29/20 at 7:53 pm to Strannix
quote:
those expanded powers are kicking in
forgot about thatPosted on 7/29/20 at 7:56 pm to fjlee90
quote:
So does this establish precedent to reclassify these platforms as publishers?
I don't know, but at least something is happening.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 7:57 pm to loogaroo
It doesn’t change anything at the moment. It’s a request for the FCC to reinterpret the law.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:01 pm to BarnHater
quote:
Where you net neutrality baws at now?
It is funny to think a lot of the people saying let the free market roam for net neutrality are the same ones who think we need big govt to protect us from censorship.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:24 pm to Champagne
quote:
When are we going to stop calling Radical Leftists "Liberals"?
When the liberal party leaders separate themselves from the radicals..
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:28 pm to xGeauxLSUx
OMb has a PEN
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:29 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
It is funny to think a lot of the people saying let the free market roam for net neutrality are the same ones who think we need big govt to protect us from censorship.
It’s not funny, because this is fricking stupid.
This is moving the internet toward more free market and away from crony protectionism.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:31 pm to xGeauxLSUx
Is it really “censorship” if it’s a company? Private or public? I assumed what we speak of as censorship was when a government commanded it.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:34 pm to Turbeauxdog
What’s the cause of action against Twitter banning you right now?
Can you sue the newspaper for not printing your letter to the editor?
Removing 230 just means I can sue twitter for you slandering me and them publishing it. If anything, this will lead to more censorship, not less.
Can you sue the newspaper for not printing your letter to the editor?
Removing 230 just means I can sue twitter for you slandering me and them publishing it. If anything, this will lead to more censorship, not less.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:37 pm to BigPerm30
Barr has had a good week. I can’t quit watching the bagpipe clip of him bitchslapping those mental midgets on FatNads committee around yesterday.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
If anything, this will lead to more censorship, not less.
I don't think anyone care about there being censorship. The problem most see with this is the one sided nature of the current censorship
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:41 pm to nugget
quote:
The problem most see with this is the one sided nature of the current censorship
But that won’t be addressed by removing 230.
That will be addressed by heightened by antitrust scrutiny on Big Tech buying smaller tech and Google and Apple limiting the growth of platforms through their App Store distribution networks. That’s how you get the free market to truly operate.
This post was edited on 7/29/20 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:46 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
But that won’t be addressed by removing 230.
That will be addressed by heightened by antitrust scrutiny on Big Tech buying smaller tech and Google and Apple limiting the growth of platforms through their App Store distribution networks. That’s how you get the free market to truly operate.
I'll take your word on it. I really haven't followed this very closely. I just know the outcome republicans are looking for.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:46 pm to boosiebadazz
Have to start somewhere
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:50 pm to xGeauxLSUx
I would love for this to have teeth and hold up. I do remember another EO having to do with social media that apparently had no teeth because their behavior didn’t change. Let’s hope this will do some good.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:52 pm to xGeauxLSUx
They won't need a warrant to view your messages now.
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:15 pm to oklahogjr
so if the business is private youre ok w them shitting on your rights?
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:How is it that there are STILL people who flip this on its head as you just did?
It is funny to think a lot of the people saying let the free market roam for net neutrality are the same ones who think we need big govt to protect us from censorship.
I don't want the government to do jack shite on this subject OTHER than stop letting these companies use government protection based on the theory they are pure platforms at the same time as they do NOT act as platforms. IN OTHER WORDS>...........that's LESS government.
SHEESH
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News