- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: Pelosi to announce formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump - @howardfine
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:51 pm to tigerinDC09
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:51 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Otherwise, I'd be more inclined to believe that the DNI IG knows more about the law than some random message board user
You might have a point if you were dealing with a neutral IG.
Guess what?
1
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:52 pm to cajunangelle
n/m
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:52 pm to NIH
Pelosi's followers:
We fight for the people! For equality! For the little man! For those who want peace and fairness! We fight against the rich and the elite! We fight against the power hungry and the man!
Who is your leader?
A 79 year old woman, who's family is politicians, and who has been in congress for 32 years, and had been in politics since the age of 20 before that, who has never had a real job.
Despite that, she has 3 homes, a Vinyard, 2 commercial properties, a football team, and an estimated net worth of over 100 million dollars.
Anyone wanna try to explain that one?
We fight for the people! For equality! For the little man! For those who want peace and fairness! We fight against the rich and the elite! We fight against the power hungry and the man!
Who is your leader?
A 79 year old woman, who's family is politicians, and who has been in congress for 32 years, and had been in politics since the age of 20 before that, who has never had a real job.
Despite that, she has 3 homes, a Vinyard, 2 commercial properties, a football team, and an estimated net worth of over 100 million dollars.
Anyone wanna try to explain that one?
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:52 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
since it was part of Nixon's articles of impeachment, it is an impeachable offense.
Nixon wasn’t impeached , so scrubbing behind your ears could have been included.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:52 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:No, it didn't. It voted to establish the parameters of an impeachment inquiry IF AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IS APPROVED.
like I said the Judiciary Committee already voted and passed the resolution to begin impeachment proceedings.
Pelosi even said what the judiciary committee did was NOT the beginning of an impeachment inquiry.
quote:LINK
At her weekly news conference Thursday, Pelosi once again declined to say the committee was conducting an impeachment investigation
Stop lying.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:53 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
Awful bold for the Dems to move forward with this not knowing what is in the complaint, the phone call transcript, etc. Hope it blows up spectacularly in their face.
Which is why I suspect she will be in favor of impeachment only if Trump keeps blocking the whistle blower complaint past Thurs.
Then, no matter what, the rationale will be that the Trump admin was breaking the whistle blower protection act.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:53 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
No matter what
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:54 pm to bmy
I just said why. First, it wasn't intelligence related, so its out of the committees' jurisdiction. Second, no laws were broken (even if you believe everything the media says. If they were, Joe would already be in prison. Third, the whistleblower DID NOT HEAR THE CALL. We have no idea how strong the provenance of this complaint is. I'd also venture a guess that the Ukrainian government might take issue with releasing the information, which would be yet another foreign policy headache completely manufactured by bloodthirsty democrats.
Its not hard.
Its not hard.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:54 pm to Plx1776
Impeachment talk wouldn't be that bad...if Democrats have been mellow and then went balls to the wall on the impeachment talk, on this issue.
That's not the case though. Democrats have been demanding that trump be impeached for every little thing. Trump could fart in an elevator, and we'd see a congressman and most msm 30 minutes later claiming that trump should be impeached for it.
No one cares anymore except the most authoritarian leftists.
That's not the case though. Democrats have been demanding that trump be impeached for every little thing. Trump could fart in an elevator, and we'd see a congressman and most msm 30 minutes later claiming that trump should be impeached for it.
No one cares anymore except the most authoritarian leftists.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:54 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Nixon wasn’t impeached , so scrubbing behind your ears could have been included.
On July 27, 29, and 30, 1974, the Committee approved three articles of impeachment against Nixon, for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress, and reported those articles to the House of Representatives.
He resigned before the full house could vote.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:So in your opinion anyone who goes to court or is even considered in the DAs office for charges is already guilty?
tigerinDC09
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:58 pm to LetsgoGamecocks
quote:
Didn't the house already vote once and they didn't have the votes? Doubt they have them now. But yes, vote, get it over with so we can move on.
Purple Democrats in the House are starting to sweat.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:58 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I just said why. First, it wasn't intelligence related, so its out of the committees' jurisdiction.
The DNI IG stated otherwise.
quote:
Second, no laws were broken
This is not a prerequisite for a whistleblower complaint.
quote:
Third, the whistleblower DID NOT HEAR THE CALL. We have no idea how strong the provenance of this complaint is.
The DNI IG knows how strong the provenance of the complaint is and deemed it Urgent and Credible. Anything else?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:59 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:So... he wasn’t impeached.
He resigned before the full house could vote.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:00 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Purple Democrats in the House are starting to sweat.
These are the democrats that are coming forward today in favor of impeachment inquiry, so your statement makes no sense.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:01 pm to Nguyener
quote:
So in your opinion anyone who goes to court or is even considered in the DAs office for charges is already guilty?
Of course not. What straw man are you trying to beat up?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:01 pm to tigerinDC09
Name them, which purple Dems?
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:02 pm to tigerinDC09
So I’m correct. You didn’t have to confirm that by the way. I had no doubt.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:03 pm to tigerinDC09
You are a POS snake that only shows up during chaos.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:03 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
So... he wasn’t impeached.
that's like saying someone who pleaded guilty wasn't convicted.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News