- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/26/25 at 5:31 pm to TigerDoc
you are mean. but it is drama queen stuff. I hate to agree with you and Sheldon.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 5:34 pm to cajunangelle
At last, we agree! 
Posted on 7/26/25 at 5:51 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Well......Dan will just be a jackass who talked way too much.
That’s how he got the job. He is treating it like his podcast where he just talks out his arse instead of doing anything that could be considered actual work.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 5:52 pm to Esquire
quote:Just like his boss
That’s how he got the job. He is treating it like his podcast where he just talks out his arse instead of doing anything that could be considered actual work.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:02 pm to Gravitiger
“What I’ve learned in our investigations has shocked me to my core”
Hopefully, that means that some crooked dems are going to prison in the near future.
Hopefully, that means that some crooked dems are going to prison in the near future.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:24 pm to Goforit
quote:Hopefully it means anyone crooked is going to prison in the near future, but highly unlikely either way. Who gives a frick what party they are? If they're crooked, put them in prison.
Hopefully, that means that some crooked dems are going to prison in the near future.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:25 pm to Goforit
quote:Nah, he said that before he was appointed.
He must have seen evidence that liberals are actually an alien species planted on earth to cause chaos and destruction.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:26 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
The alternate slate of electors was a necessary step following the precedent from the 1960 presidential election where Hawaii's EC votes were in question.
Wow. This is a completely meritless claim.
The Democratic slate was not secret, for one. In 1960, there was an active legal challenge, and Democratic electors labeled themselves as contingent upon the recount outcome. It was an actual “alternate” (not fake) slate, presented above board with contingencies.
In 2020, official certifications had already declared Biden the winner & the Trump electors met in secret in the charged cases — submitting documents claiming to be the official electors.
Those slates were presented as valid and not contingent upon cases or recounts.
Might as well have posted a pic of your Alex Jones tote bag. Is there anything you clowns won’t attempt to obfuscate with disinformation?
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:32 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Those skates were presented as valid and not contingent upon cases or recounts.
This is where his echo chamber silliness fails.
That's why the PA electors were not prosecuted
LINK
quote:
But unlike Michigan, Pennsylvania’s alternate electors are unlikely to face criminal repercussions because of an important legal caveat they added to their document.
quote:
Unlike in other states, Pennsylvania’s fake electors added an important caveat to the certificate that likely shielded them from the consequences faced by their counterparts in Michigan.
Pennsylvania’s certificate said the votes they were casting should only be counted if a court found that they were the “duly elected and qualified Electors.”
“The reasoning that we were given for the need to go through with this process was that [the campaign] was concerned that there was a number of court cases that the Trump campaign had not adjudicated yet,” DeMarco said, and the campaign hoped a favorable ruling for Trump in those cases might have changed the outcome of the vote.
In that scenario, DeMarco added, the campaign was concerned that if there was no slate of electors submitted under the constitutional process, the court victories would be meaningless.
“So I as well as others said, ‘Fine, but let's make the document reflect that,’” he said. “So we're a bit different from the other folks.”
New Mexico’s fake electors included similar language in their certificate.
The fake electors’ certificate in Michigan, where they were recently charged with forgery and other related crimes, included no such caveat.
quote:
“These ‘fake ballots’ included a conditional clause that they were only to be used if a court overturned the results in Pennsylvania, which did not happen,” Shapiro said. “Though their rhetoric and policy were intentionally misleading and purposefully damaging to our democracy, based on our initial review, our office does not believe this meets the legal standards for forgery.”
The fake electors in GA, MI, AZ listened to people like Vox
The PA master race of electors listened to people like SFP
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:33 pm to hawgfaninc
“Trust us, bros”
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Bongino is such an exaggerator
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's why the PA electors were not prosecuted
Exactly. Some of these people truly live in an alternate reality.
It’s fine to disagree when it comes to opinions or speculation, but facts are objective. Good on you disrupting the echo chamber.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:52 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Coming from someone who uses "disinformation" in earnest speaks volumes, since your ilk see that as any statements that aren't blessed by your favorite MSM talking head, thoughtfully predigested and regurgitated into your open law. Nevermind that your heroes all get their talking points from IC handlers each morning to set the narrative.
Liberal braniacs are always the smartest person in the room, no matter what room that may be. Just ask them.
I'll tell you the same thing I told your circle jerk buddy in this thread - I'm patient enough to let this sucker play out without losing my shite because it doesn't happen on my own arbitrary timeline.
Can you say the same?
Liberal braniacs are always the smartest person in the room, no matter what room that may be. Just ask them.
I'll tell you the same thing I told your circle jerk buddy in this thread - I'm patient enough to let this sucker play out without losing my shite because it doesn't happen on my own arbitrary timeline.
Can you say the same?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:53 pm to TTOWN RONMON
I don’t like the term “righteous” used by any politicians because they are all completely full of crap. I have no doubt Bongino is somewhat trying to do the right thing but it takes a certain kind of person working for the government at that level and I am not naive enough to believe that just because he is working for Trump that he is immune to corruption
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:57 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'll tell you the same thing I told your circle jerk buddy in this thread - I'm patient enough to let this sucker play out without losing my shite because it doesn't happen on my own arbitrary timeline.
Can you say the same?
Absolutely.
The rest of your post? A drawn out ad hominem.
I eagerly await your response to my rebuttal to your attempt to draw false equivalence to 1960 & what actually went down with the charges in 2020.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:58 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Assuming that you were saying that the passage you quoted was objective fact, the problem with that is in order for it to be irrefutable, objective fact, in that particular example you must have a quote from the exact prosecutor who made the decision, the reason why he or she chose not to prosecute the PA electors. THAT would be “objective fact.” ANYONE ELSE (other than of course perhaps that specific prosecutor’s colleagues in his office or his higher) is indeed SPECULATING.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 6:59 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
I eagerly await your response to my rebuttal to your attempt to draw false equivalence to 1960 & what actually went down with the charges in 2020.
Vox doesn't think of anything on his own.
Unless he's read an X post explaining how to answer, he will not, because he can't, because he isn't an analytical thinker. He's an echo chamber amplifier exclusively.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 7:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Bongino just figured out the the FBI is in place to protect Washington DC and not the people of the U.S.
Long list of crimes the FBI has enabled:
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino “shocked to his core” over FBI’s recent corruption discoveries: ‘I’ll never be the same’
Long list of crimes the FBI has enabled:
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino “shocked to his core” over FBI’s recent corruption discoveries: ‘I’ll never be the same’
Posted on 7/26/25 at 7:00 pm to davyjones
quote:
in that particular example you must have a quote from the exact prosecutor who made the decision
quote:
the reason why he or she chose not to prosecute the PA electors. THAT would be “objective fact.”
For the record, I provided such data
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News