- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Black pastors: Homosexual rights far cry from civil rights
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:30 am to GumboPot
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:30 am to GumboPot
quote:
The question is irrelevant
It is relevant in the sense that a person was discriminated against because of a genetic characteristic - a phenotype or set of phenotypes. Gays claim they are born that way and cannot help it - a genotype. In both cases, there is a claim that you are being discriminated against based on something that is out of your control. In the case of blacks, that is certainly true. Is that the case for gays as well? Has there been a "gay gene" pinpointed?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:34 am to davesdawgs
quote:Poorly worded.
Homosexual rights far cry from civil rights
I presume he was referring to the quest for equal rights rather than the rights themselves. Assuming that, I'd agree wholeheartedly.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:34 am to DeltaDoc
I wonder if the other gay black guys are pissed at Michael Sam being with little whitey Vito ... just like how all the sistahs get pissed when brothas shack up with white beyotches.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:38 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
Has there been a "gay gene" pinpointed?
Yup. It's above the "good at hockey" gene and between the "murder" gene and the "hitchhiker thumb" gene. It is linked to the "I like Barbara Streisand" gene. Though it is not understood how exactly.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:22 am to GumboPot
quote:
The question is irrelevant. It's irrelevant because gays were never slaves and do not have a comparable history to blacks in this country.
Not comparable in the sense that gays weren't slaves but black people were never jailed for being black. Gay people were.
Ever heard of Stonewall? The start of the "gay rights movement? Seems back in the 60's, if you went to a gay bar, you were subject to arrest for various morals charges. In fact, you couldn't get a liquor license if you sold to gays. So the only owners were mainly the mafia, who'd pay off the BAT and police and serve overpriced watered down drinks to the gays. You'd knock on the door, they'd eye you through a peephole and then let you in. Every so often the cops would raid, beat some gays over the head with clubs, arrest a few, it would make the paper and everyone was happy. Except the gays.
Then one day things got ugly. No one knows why for sure. Maybe it was because Judy Garland died and the gays were not in a good mood. But the Public Morals Squad raided the place in 1969, turned up the lights, locked the doors and began asking for IDs of the men dressed as men and arrested the men dressed as women. The paddy wagon waited outside. But so did a growing pissed off crowd of gays, drag queens and worst of all lesbians.
When the cops opened the door to haul their arrested in, one lesbian was fighting the handcuffs saying they were too tight. The cops started hitting her with clubs. She yelled to the crowd of gays which had grown by then to do something. They did. They fought back. They beat the hell out of the cops, who retreated and barricaded themselves in the bar. A full on riot ensued. That night and the nights that followed. And there you have it Virginia... how the gay rights movement began.
Do you know the case of Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986 Supreme Court case which upheld sodomy laws as constitutional? It seems Hardwick (yes that's the gay man's name) worked at a gay bar and while at work, tossed an empty beer bottle into the trash just outside the door of the bar. He was ticketed by the cops for public drinking. He tried to pay the ticket but the clerk couldn't find the paperwork. A warrant was issued and when the cop showed up at his door, a friend who was sleeping and hungover on the couch, opened the door and allowed the cop in. The cop walks in, sees Hardwick's bedroom door ajar, walks in and seems Hardwick "in the act" of oral sex with another man. Both are arrested. I'd say that's an infringement on civil rights but hey, I'm not a "libertarian" so maybe I'm out of my element.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:28 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
I'm not a "libertarian"
but you are racist
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:33 am to DeltaDoc
Nm
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 11:35 am
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:38 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
It is relevant in the sense that a person was discriminated against because of a genetic characteristic - a phenotype or set of phenotypes. Gays claim they are born that way and cannot help it - a genotype. In both cases, there is a claim that you are being discriminated against based on something that is out of your control. In the case of blacks, that is certainly true. Is that the case for gays as well? Has there been a "gay gene" pinpointed?
IMO there is no "gay gene". It's a combination of genes that express themselves though environmental factors during the human development years that cause the release of abnormal levels of hormone during those development years.
With that said gays and blacks have different histories.
And it is unbelievably offensive and disingenuous for the gay lobby to ride the coattails of African American history. The two are not even remotely comparable. I mean we fought a freaking war and a main issue of that war was black slavery...630,000 Americans died in that war.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:45 am to GumboPot
quote:
630,000 Americans died in that war.
Yeah but that Lesbian at Stonecourtgate mall had her handcuffs put on too tight. You probably missed that above. Read that Vegas Bengal post. It will clear it up for you.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:46 am to davesdawgs
So knowing this, why would they vote for the Devil? And by Devil i mean the party who is being led by the Devil. And by that i mean the Devils menions. Not Obama.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:47 am to Alt26
Honestly, comparing the plight of blacks in this country to homosexuals is probably pretty insulting to blacks.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:52 am to udtiger
quote:
Toddy is going to be very displeased.
Why? Because of what some black preacher in Detroit said? Atlanta's congressman, John Lewis, as well as Coretta Scott King have both given long speeches comparing the parallels of the gay rights movement to the civil rights movement. I think I'll go by what they say.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:55 am to davesdawgs
I agree that comparing gay marriage to civil rights is a disservice to the civil rights movement, but like the OP said I bet 95% of that congregation voted for the party that supports abortion and gay marriage.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 11:57 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
Vegas Bengal
quote:No doubt there has been persecution. But if the effort is to piggyback onto Black History as an equivalence, that would be a mistake, IMO.
one day things got ugly. No one knows why for sure. Maybe it was because Judy Garland died and the gays were not in a good mood. But the Public Morals Squad raided the place in 1969, turned up the lights, locked the doors and began asking for IDs of the men dressed as men and arrested the men dressed as women. The paddy wagon waited outside. But so did a growing pissed off crowd of gays, drag queens and worst of all lesbians.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:03 pm to davesdawgs
the victim groups the democrats have put their thumb on are beginning to become incompatible
women and islam?
gays and islam?
gays and black people (heavily Christian)?
gays and latinos (heavily Christian)?
islam and atheism?
WTF are these people thinking, they're creating a dangerous compound and it is going to blow up in their face.
none of these groups are victims, but that hasn't stopped the liberals from telling them that and making them believe it. how long before this blows the frick up in their face?
women and islam?
gays and islam?
gays and black people (heavily Christian)?
gays and latinos (heavily Christian)?
islam and atheism?
WTF are these people thinking, they're creating a dangerous compound and it is going to blow up in their face.
none of these groups are victims, but that hasn't stopped the liberals from telling them that and making them believe it. how long before this blows the frick up in their face?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:04 pm to dewster
No one is comparing the plight of the black race and gays. But what you're suggesting is unless you've been enslaved your civil rights haven't been infringed upon.
Righties today love to throw around the term tyranny because gasp the government wants you to register your guns or keeps a data on millions of phone calls while ignoring the tyranny of a govt which arrests it's citizens for having oral sex in the privacy of their bedrooms or for men wearing women's clothes. Back in the 80s an MP used to park outside the gay bar in Alexandria and arrest servicemen walking out the bar. But hey that's not civil rights because they weren't enslaved.
Ever heard of Turing who cracked the German code which played a huge part of winning the war? He was gay and was British and committed the crime of being gay. He was forced to undergo what some call chemical castration. He committed suicide. LINK / but hey 200 years ago his ancestors weren't slaves so he should have taken his punishment.
Righties today love to throw around the term tyranny because gasp the government wants you to register your guns or keeps a data on millions of phone calls while ignoring the tyranny of a govt which arrests it's citizens for having oral sex in the privacy of their bedrooms or for men wearing women's clothes. Back in the 80s an MP used to park outside the gay bar in Alexandria and arrest servicemen walking out the bar. But hey that's not civil rights because they weren't enslaved.
Ever heard of Turing who cracked the German code which played a huge part of winning the war? He was gay and was British and committed the crime of being gay. He was forced to undergo what some call chemical castration. He committed suicide. LINK / but hey 200 years ago his ancestors weren't slaves so he should have taken his punishment.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:05 pm to dewster
Also, today in countries around the world being gay is punishable by death. But hey it's not a matter of civil rights so we're good
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:05 pm to DelU249
quote:
how long before this blows the frick up in their face?
When there's no more "other people's money."
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yup. It's above the "good at hockey" gene and between the "murder" gene and the "hitchhiker thumb" gene. It is linked to the "I like Barbara Streisand" gene. Though it is not understood how exactly.
It's on twitter under #cannotreproducelol
Posted on 5/16/14 at 12:15 pm to NC_Tigah
Once again the plight of two groups do not need to be equal for both to experience tyranny. Women struggled for equal rights including the vote but you can't say bc their plight wasn't that of blacks it's an insult to call their struggle a quest for equal rights and civil liberties.
And to the poster complaining about "victimhood" remember that the next time you post in the daily threads about the victimization of the right by the media, the Christians, the white man.
And to the poster complaining about "victimhood" remember that the next time you post in the daily threads about the victimization of the right by the media, the Christians, the white man.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News