Started By
Message

re: Biden set Trump up denying him customary intel briefings, which deactivated POTUS SCIF

Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Trump was a greenhorn newb to being a President, I will give you that


Ok, and he didnt attend National Security briefings. At first he would send someone from his staff, that ended quickly and the Pentagon rep would leave that days slides on the National Security desk.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110953 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

it is laugh out loud funny to watch the maga world try to spin this.

"he didnt have anything"
"he did have a few things but the feds didnt want them back"
"the feds wanted them back and got them when they asked"
"the feds didn't get everything back because trump didn't pack those boxes and didn't know about them but now he gave them back"
"he forgot a few things but NOW he's given everything back"
"if the feds wanted everything back all they had to do was ask, this raid is insane"
"he doesn't have to give anything back because its all his"
"trump was tricked into having this stuff, its not even his."



Why's he still walking free?

Shouldn't you be concerned with what sort of damage he could do to our country with just the knowledge of the vital top secret documents that the FBI so bravely retrieved from his lair?

Why did you need to adopt an alter to address this stuff?
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
10401 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:30 pm to
Biden didn't concoct that scheme. Someone else thunk that up.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:30 pm to
hey lefty troll. What does your avatar you put up right away mean?



You took the time to also remove your default Alabama flag.

You are so professional. Are you shareblue, or did someone leave the gate to hell AKA DU's gate open?
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 4:32 pm
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8422 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:33 pm to
16 post from fed or du plant

Have you read amy comey Barrett legal opinion on this? Very enlightening but I’m sure you don’t have any interest in the actual law
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:33 pm to
Yeah, obviously, duh. But he announced Trump does not get intel briefings anymore.

Biden is Obama 2.0 with Susan Rice being dictated to by Obama daily.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
16063 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

"he didnt have anything


He had lots of documents. He was allowed to have those documents.

quote:

he did have a few things but the feds didnt want them back


He had things that the national archives wanted but they didn't have a right to get them.

quote:

the feds wanted them back and got them when they asked"


He gave some documents that the national archives wanted back.

quote:

feds didn't get everything back because trump didn't pack those boxes and didn't know about them but now he gave them back"


He didn't need to give them back.

quote:

he forgot a few things but NOW he's given everything back


It doesn't matter if he gave everything they requested back. It was the national archives requesting these documents.

The president at the time ultimately decides what documents they are allowed to have.

quote:

the feds wanted everything back all they had to do was ask, this raid is insane"


If the national archives wanted documents, they can ask. The former president can refuse. The raid is insane because these points are too be discussed in civil court with the former president ultimately deciding.

quote:

he doesn't have to give anything back because its all his"


Legally speaking, yes.

quote:

trump was tricked into having this stuff, its not even his


Never seen anyone here bring up that point.
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35676 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:40 pm to
Yeah. Biden couldn't mastermind a game of Solitaire.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:40 pm to
Which sellout General's book did you get that from? IIRC: The JCS, Milley, Mattis pissed Trump off with their neocon ways of idiocy. BFD.

PROOF: Look at how they handled the drawdown in Afghanistan. They are the war monger POS that sold out their country to the MIC.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37539 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:45 pm to
Yeah, most are like bank vaults.But there should have been a SCIF at Mar a Lago because the President would be there. If there was never one built, that's on Trump and his intel people.
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4716 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:53 pm to
This lawfare BS is blatantly dishonest to the public. From their point-of-view, that makes TRUMP the victim/martyr. It will only make him stronger, and the MAGA movement.

If they have him blocked by some kind of lawfare BS, he will still destroy the establishment by leading the masses from the outside. Like has already been going on.

This political cycle's realignment will be the masses in the public getting screwed by the establishment gathering under the MAGA republican party and America First values.
It will be the end of the ever expanding Wilsonion Executive Branch.

The Dems will have female college feminists', and flaming gays.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110953 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

quote:
Why's he still walking free?
FBI Mar-a-Lago affidavit: “the FBI has not yet identified all potential criminal confederates nor located all evidence related to its investigation”



I've never heard of them getting everything they need on their chief target, but waiting to hopefully rope in a few underlings before choosing to charge him.

That's interesting. Especially given all the vital national security issues supposedly at stake here.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
11079 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

it is laugh out loud funny to watch the maga world try to spin this.


It's funny to watch you Marxist turd bags come in here and constantly attack while ignoring everything. One day you will regret pulling for the end of America when we are all standing in line looking for food hand outs.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Mke

quote:

he didnt have anything" "he did have a few things but the feds didnt want them back" "the feds wanted them back and got them when they asked" "the feds didn't get everything back because trump didn't pack those boxes and didn't know about them but now he gave them back" "he forgot a few things but NOW he's given everything back" "if the feds wanted everything back all they had to do was ask, this raid is insane" "he doesn't have to give anything back because its all his" "trump was tricked into having this stuff, its not even his."

So tell us what he had. I don’t want to hear vague bullshite like “he had X number of classified documents”. Don’t tell me vague shite like “it’s national security” or “sources and methods”. Every agency involved has lost their benefit of the doubt to have their vague bullshite believed.

AG Garland, tell us what was in the documents. What is the actual danger? You don’t have to name names, but you have to give actual information on what the damage is supposed to
Be.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:21 pm to
There is a SCIF at Mar-A-Lago. There is also one at his NJ Presidential office.

Posted by Texaggie96
Member since Dec 2018
1381 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Were any of them in a bathroom closet safely stored in an unprotected server? I here that was a super safe SCIF.

Are you arguing that they both should be in jail, because I agree. Or is this just some pathetic, but officer she was speeding too!!!
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37314 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Are you arguing that they both should be in jail, because I agree.

Why should either of them be in jail for possessing innocuous documents that were over-classified by the federal government and/or for possessing documents that caused zero damage to the United States?

If there is a damage to the United States, what is it?
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 5:35 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70660 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:36 pm to
Yep, he maybe losing it and was always stupid but he’s still a conniving and evil Kunt. His lucid moments are still nothing but corruption like they’ve always been.
Posted by Mke
Member since Aug 2022
31 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

So tell us what he had. I don’t want to hear vague bullshite like “he had X number of classified documents”. Don’t tell me vague shite like “it’s national security” or “sources and methods”. Every agency involved has lost their benefit of the doubt to have their vague bullshite believed.
hahaha, is this where you are now, am I supposed to be on the FBI scrub team or else trump is innocent? we both know it wouldnt matter anyway, it could come out that trump sold the longitude and latitude of our spies and you still wouldnt care, youd still give him a pass. and you fricking people have the nerve to call yourselves patriots.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram