- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/23/21 at 8:33 am to Jjdoc
First of all, let's get the entirety of what he said.
Now, why don't you discuss why Biden said this in light of what almost happened on Jan 6.
quote:
It’s no longer just about who gets to vote or making it easier for eligible voters to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote — who gets to count whether or not your vote counted at all. It’s about moving from independent election administrators who work for the people to polarized state legislatures and partisan actors who work for political parties.
Now, why don't you discuss why Biden said this in light of what almost happened on Jan 6.
Posted on 10/23/21 at 8:35 am to texridder
Fist attempt and what an epic fail
Good try Texdiddler
Good try Texdiddler
Posted on 10/23/21 at 9:14 am to texridder
As always, you suck at life.
don’t exist in Dem strongholds.
They are beholden to the Democratic Party and are willing to win “by any means necessary.”
A count like you supports cheating as long as “your side” wins.
I prefer election integrity.
Now kindly...
quote:
independent election administrators
don’t exist in Dem strongholds.
They are beholden to the Democratic Party and are willing to win “by any means necessary.”
A count like you supports cheating as long as “your side” wins.
I prefer election integrity.
Now kindly...
This post was edited on 10/23/21 at 9:15 am
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:46 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
They are beholden to the Democratic Party and are willing to win “by any means necessary.”
Would this qualify as being "by any means necessary"?
A losing presidential candidate calls a secretary of state after the election and implies that the SOS has committed criminal acts in administering the vote in his state and then asks the SOS to "recalculate" the vote so that the losing candidate wins that state.
What do you think?
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:50 am to texridder
quote:
What do you think?
Like everyone else here, I think you’re a fricking moron. Thanks for asking.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:52 am to Jjdoc
One of the rare moments where truth dribbled out of his mouth.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:56 am to Jjdoc
The left keeps the Rinos in power. Probably help them cheat to win and when the chips are on the table, blackmail them to keep them inline.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:06 am to Chet Donnely
quote:
Like everyone else here,
Like everyone else here who refuses to give the obvious answer to that question about Trump's call to Raffensperger and pretends that it never happened.
But it did.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:24 am to texridder
quote:
Like everyone else here who refuses to give the obvious answer to that question about Trump's call to Raffensperger and pretends that it never happened.
Nobody pretends there was no phone call. Go pull the transcript, post it here, and then continue to talk shite like a fricking idiot.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:45 am to texridder
quote:
in light of what almost happened on Jan 6.
Unarmed trespassers almost did what on Jan 6th?
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:46 am to texridder
quote:
What do you think?
I think your bitch arse should post the transcript of that conversation instead of paraphrasing it.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:50 am to texridder
quote:
independent election administrators
Maybe Democrats shouldn’t have sold their local elections offices to Mark Zuckerberg.
He literally paid money and put his people in, and they turned into get out the vote operations in favor of Dems. “Buying elections” wasn’t supposed to refer to literally buying an election system but that diabolical guy really jumped the shark.
People are tired of third world elections systems with postmodern ballot counting.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:56 am to Jjdoc
I think it started in South Carolina during the primaries. Remember how Biden pulled off such a big win, then never looked back. No way did South Carolinians go so strongly for Biden. SIAP but that primary should be under scrutiny.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 1:06 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
A losing presidential candidate calls a secretary of state after the election and implies that the SOS has committed criminal acts in administering the vote in his state and then asks the SOS to "recalculate" the vote so that the losing candidate wins that state.
quote:
Nobody pretends there was no phone call. Go pull the transcript, post it here, and then continue to talk shite like a fricking idiot.
Here you go sport. The full transcript. Now why don't you point out where I was talking shite.
msn
Posted on 10/24/21 at 1:10 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 10/24/21 at 1:22 pm to Azkiger
quote:
A losing presidential candidate calls a secretary of state after the election and implies that the SOS has committed criminal acts in administering the vote in his state and then asks the SOS to "recalculate" the vote so that the losing candidate wins that state.
quote:
What do you think?
quote:Does that mean you aren't familiar with the content of Trump's phone call? Not surprising.
I think your bitch arse should post the transcript of that conversation instead of paraphrasing it.
I posted a link a couple of posts up from here. How's my paraphrasing?
Posted on 10/24/21 at 1:46 pm to texridder
quote:
Now why don't you point out where I was talking shite.
Every word you’ve said. He talked about issues with the election and the lack of election integrity in that state. Issues nobody with a brain denies existed. Eat shite, sport.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 2:14 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
Now why don't you point out where I was talking shite.
quote:
Every word you’ve said. He talked about issues with the election and the lack of election integrity in that state. Issues nobody with a brain denies existed.
I wasn't discussing your PG-13 version of the call. This is exactly what I said:
quote:
A losing presidential candidate calls a secretary of state after the election and implies that the SOS has committed criminal acts in administering the vote in his state and then asks the SOS to "recalculate" the vote so that the losing candidate wins that state
What part of that is me talking shite? Or, why is it you don't want to give a straight answer?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News