- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bernie Sanders just hates wealthy people
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:24 pm
just simply because they are wealthy. I am watching this confirmation hearing on the education secretary and he asked her if she was;t a billionaire does she think she would be sitting here. It is amazing to me how democrats hate wealthy people that area actually successful but they are ok with democrats being rich from exploiting poor people.
19
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:26 pm to BamaScoop
He sure loves his new lake "house" and new sports car courtesy of shitlery and Co.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:27 pm to BamaScoop
When Bernie gives 2 of his 3 homes away to a homeless person, I might take him seriously.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:27 pm to BamaScoop
That first question from him made me angry. If she's been successful and made a lot of money, it's her right to choose how it's spent. Quit hating success.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:31 pm to DyeHardDylan
She has done more for education than that piece of shite has ever done for anything in his entire life.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:34 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
That first question from him made me angry. If she's been successful and made a lot of money, it's her right to choose how it's spent. Quit hating success.
She has not made her money. She was born wealthy and she married into wealth. She has never held a job in private industry that did not have family connections.
Plus he is right. If she was working in War-Mart and held the same views she wouldn't be nominated for Secretary of Education.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:36 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
Typical liberal. Create a hypothetical situation, then attack that situation.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:37 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
She has not made her money. She was born wealthy and she married into wealth. She has never held a job in private industry that did not have family connections.
Oh you fricking piece of shite.
If all her money is family money she is one step above our current SecState, who married into his.
ALMOST ALL of obama's cabinet never hed a job in the private sector in their ENTIRE LIVES.
NOW it matters.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:39 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
obama has not made its money. It has never held a job in private industry. It has conned the idiot liberal voter for the past 8 years and will alway be a race baiting, community organizing, con artist milking money from the tax payers and the idiot liberals
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:40 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
You could say that about most people in positions of power or influence. It doesn't matter, though. Being wealthy and coming from privilege also means that a person has a greater likelihood of getting a good education, work experience, or other opportunities to do good than others without such wealth or influence could.
You could argue that her position in life has made her more qualified.
Regardless, if she earned every cent she has or married into it, it doesn't matter. It's her legal property. That's something Marxists hate: property rights.
You could argue that her position in life has made her more qualified.
Regardless, if she earned every cent she has or married into it, it doesn't matter. It's her legal property. That's something Marxists hate: property rights.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:40 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
she was;t a billionaire does she think she would be sitting her
Because that woman had zero qualifications for the position. Did you ever consider that fact? She is there simply because she inherited wealth.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:42 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Plus he is right. If she was working in War-Mart and held the same views she wouldn't be nominated for Secretary of Education.
But what if.....BUT WHAT IF!!! fricking liberals
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:43 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
She has not made her money.
Uh yes she has. She and her husband founded a major corporation in 1989 that has grown and been quite successful.
And yes she is qualified to be Secretary of Education. She's served on numerous education and education reform committees as either chairwoman or a member over the last three decades. Some of her ideas have been enacted as policy in several states.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:45 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
She has not made her money.
So who's money did she make? She didn't have a job? If I work for my grandfather's company, I'm not making my own money?
How on earth? So who's money am I making? Pretty sure the check goes to me.
quote:
War-Mart and held the same views she wouldn't be nominated for Secretary of Education
Well. I'd sure hope we wouldn't appoint a Walmart worker to secretary of education. But nice bullshite hypothetical. You're pathetic.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:45 pm to BamaScoop
Old burns is a rabid, mentally deranged, liberal idiot that's been conning the libtards for years. They're just flat out too stupid to even see it. Typical of a mentally deranged creature.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:46 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
I assume you approve of trumps private sector appointments.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:46 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
If she was working in War-Mart and held the same views she wouldn't be nominated for Secretary of Education.
You are by far the dumbest of the lefties on this board. Every argument you try to make is laughable. Wtf does your worthless hypothetical have to do with anything?
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:47 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
She has not made her money. She was born wealthy and she married into wealth. She has never held a job in private industry that did not have family connections.
I don't know anything about her, but suddenly this matters to libs RE political appts. (or anyone in DC)? HO LEE shite
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:49 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
. Some of her ideas have been enacted as policy in several states.
And none of them have worked. It is ideology over evidence.There are several studies on the results the for-profit charter schools she pushed for in Detroit. The results are not any better than the previous school's results.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 5:53 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
If she was working in War-Mart and held the same views she wouldn't be nominated for Secretary of Education.
Or, if she was a democrat, she could collude to help make you fail in an election Bernie, and you wouldn't whisper a mumble of protest, being a good cuck and all.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News