Being pro-choice in 2019 is the equivalent to being pro-slavery in 1860

Both are morally repugnant positions that utilize similar arguments when their pros are weighted against their cons.

"Her body, her choice" is the same argument as "You can't tell a man what to do with his own property."

In both instances, we are dealing with human life. In 2019, that life just so happens to reside within a mother's womb instead of within a plantation.

Similarly, those who are pro-choice often try to appeal to fiscal conservatives, telling them to think about the money we're saving by eliminating unwanted pregnancies. Those who are pro-slavery argued that keeping four million Americans enslaved meant that poor whites didn't have to worry about getting their jobs stolen by cheaper labor.

At the end of the day, this abortion argument comes down to the same semantics that were argued in the abolition debate 150+ years ago. Those who are pro-choice, just like those who were pro-slavery, are on the wrong side of the argument on this one.

And just like slavery, I fear that it will take a constitutional amendment to settle argument.