Started By
Message

re: Barr eviscerated the beautiful orange man.

Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37038 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Roger that, mate. I don't think he knows what he's talking about on 2,000 Mules but that's just me.

Under oath he said he saw it and laughed about it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62023 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

I bet Bill barr has watched as much of 2000 mules as he has of the Jeffrey epstein jail video he said he watched. ZERO.



The movie is the narrative.

The assertions he's making can't be determined by the movie. It would have to be an analysis of the underlying data and methodoogy.

So, without arguing whether his conclusion is correct or not, who did Barr have review the underlying data to form his conclusion? Bunk Moreland hasn't even considered this question much less received an answer to it. I'm telling you, this is a simple intelligence issue. Some people think critically. Some people do not. OP is the latter.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
12177 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:34 pm to
Barr was quiet until he wanted to sell books.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I put CNN in the car for five minutes a little while ago
quote:

you listen to CNN and believe what they or anyone on it says then you are way below retard on the IQ scale

If we are talking about a recording of someone's statement, WTF difference does it make whether it was broadcast on OAN, CNN or via ansible?
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
26709 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:36 pm to
In other words Barr didn't watch it.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34945 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Nutcase conspiracy theory after nutcase conspiracy theory. How do you guys do this every day?


Thinking for oneself can be a hassle, I will admit.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62571 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Barr believes that preserving the system is more valuable than the truth.
Basically everyone. If they wanted confidence in the election, they would investigate it. they refuse.
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
3990 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I put CNN in the car for five minutes


That, in itself, tells where you are.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29472 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Under oath he said he saw it and laughed about it.


Ok. And his mocking of it, as explained by OP, isn't really convincing to me. I don't take issue with anything else he says, I just think he doesn't understand the premise behind the use of technology and how they implemented it. I know he was recently in charge of the DOJ, but it could be that he's just an old guy that doesn't understand the basis of it.

I do acknowledge it is entirely possible True the Vote + D'Souza are either inflating or misrepresenting their data. But I found the case they made, when taken at face value, to be compelling, as the basis for further investigation / scrutiny.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141467 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:48 pm to
Did Barr ever say why he ok'ed the kill shot on Randy Weavers wife?

Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
4429 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:51 pm to
When all of these vile Dems die and burn in hell, and yes, they will ALL burn in hell, we will then be free from the lies, hate, theft, corruption, extortion and blatant evil the Democratic Jackass Party represents.
Posted by dr
texas
Member since Mar 2022
1290 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Did Barr ever say why he ok'ed the kill shot on Randy Weavers wife?



good question

waco, too
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34945 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Ok. And his mocking of it, as explained by OP, isn't really convincing to me. I don't take issue with anything else he says, I just think he doesn't understand the premise behind the use of technology and how they implemented it. I know he was recently in charge of the DOJ, but it could be that he's just an old guy that doesn't understand the basis of it.

I do acknowledge it is entirely possible True the Vote + D'Souza are either inflating or misrepresenting their data. But I found the case they made, when taken at face value, to be compelling, as the basis for further investigation / scrutiny.



Gurantee Bill Barr went back to a flip phone after he accidentally turned on the flashlight of his iphone and couldn't get it off until his grandkids came to visit.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
24527 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Bunk Moreland
quote:

Michigan fan
quote:

Call me a cuck, but I feel like HHTM at this point.


You dudes seem to have a lot in common.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

I do acknowledge it is entirely possible True the Vote + D'Souza are either inflating or misrepresenting their data. But I found the case they made, when taken at face value, to be compelling, as the basis for further investigation / scrutiny
Anyone who cannot tell a compelling story when presenting only the facts favorable to his own side? That person should get out of the business.

That documentary is a lot like a DA seeking an indictment. If he cannot get the Grand Jury to do what he wants, he should consider a career teaching typewriter maintenance at the Rocco Globbo School for Women.

Would the story survive scrutiny in an adversarial proceeding? We will probably never know.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141467 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

It’s been fascinating to watch Cabinet members join the Administration, everyone get excited for them and how badass they are,


FTR, I called out Barr on day 1 due to his involvement with Ruby Ridge. I was heavily downvoted for it.

I even had to argue with 1 little fella who was certain Janet Reno was behind Ruby Ridge.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75228 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

WTF difference does it make whether it was broadcast on OAN, CNN or via ansible?

You guys lose your goddamned mind whenever Jim Hoft reports on someone else's article content on Gateway Pundit. GTFOH, acting like sources don't matter but content does.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37038 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I do acknowledge it is entirely possible True the Vote + D'Souza are either inflating or misrepresenting their data.
What gave it away? The overly dramatic music? Or complete lack of proof?

quote:

But I found the case they made, when taken at face value, to be compelling, as the basis for further investigation / scrutiny.
This is the same of all of this nonsense. Just raise questions, ignore any obvious answers, and use that to try to claim it is other people's responsibility to look into things.

Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141467 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

waco, too


Waco was all Reno.

Ruby Ridge was Barr though.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38682 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 1:03 pm to
Bill Barr showed his colors back at Ruby Ridge. He’ll go with the Deep State regardless of any Constitutional or even moral complications. He’d prosecute the TD Poliboard if we really stirred up the street. 100%.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram