re: attractive, white women who vote Democrat...

Still thinks they have their pick of guys. Doesn’t realize they’re the very bottom of the dating pool.

quote:

---

the other 1% of them are full of whores, sodomites,

---

Can you get me the names, phone numbers and photos of these 1%? They may need some loving

Pictures would help me understand

quote:

---

The rejection of these women by secure masculine men is making them even more insane.

Their men either become mega- feminized lap dogs, or start looking for old school feminine women who still dig masculine traits.

Either way they end up without a man, screaming at the tv.

---

(4) spot-on observations right there -- capped by the coup de grace -- the now defective all-alone converted Feminist B who thanks to CNN/MSNBC/Dem propaganda, blew having ANY normal relationship forever.

Zigg= wild generalizations

Watch a Trump rally and describe those tards

Always a risk trying to explain what many consider "unexplainable."

Very likely successfully conditioned from 4th grade on, by the very best in marxian behavioral modification techniques cleverly disguised and presented as "progressivism."

Add to the mix those who are sole viewers of the major news outlets which merely reinforce their conditioning.

So it's unavoidable that they'd eventually expose to the world the level of their state of confusion, lack of concept of self, acuity, and rejection of their 3 thousand-plus years of upward evolution.

Ordinarily such a "package" would be considered irretrievable.

For the most part, those in question found themselves in the clutches of the philistines early in life and were helpless to do anything but just accept it as the way things ought to be.

They just weren't caught early enough to prevent this continuing disaster.

But there are qualifiers to this.

Their innate emotionalism, caprice, desire to be accepted by peers, and basic maternalism have been used against them by slick behaviorists in the propaganda mills and media now for at least three generations.

But most critical and potentially devastating is their tendency to give the LCD the benefit of the doubt.

Too many of them did not see the folly and danger in that tendency - at least early enough to make a difference - resulting in it either ruining, or even costing so many of them their very lives.

But don't think those little behaviorists we allowed in here during the war and gave them unlimited access and carte blanche to our critical institutions weren't fully aware of the white female psyche, and the fertile field it offered for experimentation with their latest "concepts."

It's why they immediately viewed them as their prime target for "guidance."

Corrupt the West's females and you've got better than half the battle won.

Just one personal experience that took place long before this Trump-Russia contrived dossier fallacy.

Had one - college-educated - tell me that even though Dan Rather's great exposé of George Bush's Air National Guard personnel papers purportedly from the early '70s were produced and printed (forged) using Microsoft Word, that the substance of what they contained was correct.

The crux of the problem is that such volatile, whimsical, image-conscious personalities dominated by vanity are fertile fields for manipulation and exploitation.

Anyone challenge this?

Read any of Edward Bernays' works and see how he absolutely feasted on this type of persona.

The most skilled, effective propagandist this country, this globe, ever produced.

These are called AWFLs

Affluent White Female Liberals

quote:

---

Democrats don't exist in the natural order. It is only through a successful, morally good society, that socialist ideas are even allowed to flourish.

---

Excellent.

“People who disagree with me are ignorant.” You sound like a leftist.

There are plenty of people, women and men, who are leftist and are extremely smart. They disagree with me for a variety of reasons. Some disagree because they have different values. They value collectivist security over individual liberty. Others share my values, but disagree with me on the right way to achieve them. For example, they think giving poor people money will solve the poor people problem. I think the way to solve it is to hold them accountable, and that giving them money disincentivizes productive behavior. But don’t demonize those with whom you disagree. This is what children do.