- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attn: @Augustus516 @jizzle6609 and all the other sheep regarding Hegseth
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:56 am to redneck hippie
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:56 am to redneck hippie
Its always funny when you see libtards pretending tk care about national security
0
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:58 am to FutureMikeVIII
And again, how do you know it happened?
That nonsense about a journalist ending up on the chat was tooooo funny.
Something about how when he was added to the meeting it was because another person had the same initials and that is how he mistakenly got added.
No one asked "Okay at your level you have over a thousand contacts on your phone........and you save them all with two initials?"
Its hilarious some of you fall for this nonsense over and over. From the NYT who has lied to you from russian pissers to joe biden in mensa condition.
And yet here we are.
Hegseth on a group chat describing f-18 strikes to his wife and others. Yeah that sounds real. ....real funny
That nonsense about a journalist ending up on the chat was tooooo funny.
Something about how when he was added to the meeting it was because another person had the same initials and that is how he mistakenly got added.
No one asked "Okay at your level you have over a thousand contacts on your phone........and you save them all with two initials?"
Its hilarious some of you fall for this nonsense over and over. From the NYT who has lied to you from russian pissers to joe biden in mensa condition.
And yet here we are.
Hegseth on a group chat describing f-18 strikes to his wife and others. Yeah that sounds real. ....real funny
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:59 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
He either shared classified info (which is what you are claiming…based solely off of allegations made by people that were shite-canned (probably colluding with each other no less),
I’m not claiming any of it. Someone asked me what the facts (allegations) of the story were.
My initial point was that the statement was not a denial of the allegations. Just an attempt to downplay the seriousness, shift the focus, and attack the source.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:00 am to FutureMikeVIII
I will say this, Musk and crew have been digging in the Pentagon for a few weeks now.....and nothing public like with other offices.
Seems to me they must have found some very alarming things, hence all this nonsense coming out.
Now that makes a lot more sense than these ignorant stories.
Seems to me they must have found some very alarming things, hence all this nonsense coming out.
Now that makes a lot more sense than these ignorant stories.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:00 am to redneck hippie
And you just keep tripping over your own feet trying to prove a point and failing miserably every time.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:04 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
CUI is controlled unclassified information.
Which is part of the classification system... Like I said, if he did not share information that had been classified or to make it more clear for you, marked or designated within the system, then your argument falls apart around you...
CUI is utilized when providing briefings outside of DoD, like to Congress or other agencies...
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:22 am to The Maj
quote:
Like I said, if he did not share information that had been classified or to make it more clear for you, marked or designated within the system, then your argument falls apart around you...
Is your argument that there was not sensitive information in the Signals chat that was leaked? Just because they didn’t do their job and properly classify the info doesn’t mean it should be shared.
Just like with Hillary’s emails. None of it was properly marked and “in the system,” but it was determined that there was a shitload of info that should’ve been marked. To be clear, I think Hillary’s emails were a much bigger problem than the Signal leaks.
Your logic seems to suggest she did nothing wrong? I reject that.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:24 am to The Maj
quote:
Which is part of the classification system...
They should just all use Gmail then, eh?
Pete is in over his head. He may grow into the job, but he isnt there now.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:30 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Just like with Hillary’s emails. None of it was properly marked and “in the system,” but it was determined that there was a shitload of info that should’ve been marked. To be clear, I think Hillary’s emails were a much bigger problem than the Signal leaks.
They communicated via an approved app that was preloaded on their phones. Stop melting down.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:31 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They should just all use Gmail then, eh?
Simpleton comment.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:34 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Simpleton comment.
Hillary's shitty lawyer just showed up
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:40 am to jbdawgs03
quote:You know that means there are more Signal chats right?
There was no classified information in any Signal chat
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:42 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
My initial point was that the statement was not a denial of the allegations. Just an attempt to downplay the seriousness, shift the focus, and attack the source.
The source(s) are being challenged, and rightfully so.
Assuming that the allegations of disgruntled former employees as fact doesn’t compute for me.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 10:50 am to mmcgrath
quote:
You know that means there are more Signal chats right?
of course. It was the approved pre-installed app they were told to use you dummy. Posted on 4/21/25 at 11:10 am to cajunangelle
quote:
While the ones kicked out do to covid and not loyal to Biden-- are not offered much.
Better yet, Pete and Donald said that all those people have to agree that they quit their jobs voluntarily and without coercion just to get their old jobs back.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 11:28 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
The source(s) are being challenged, and rightfully so.
Assuming that the allegations of disgruntled former employees as fact doesn’t compute for me.
They better hope it is all lies and that it is provable, because they've now gone on record and confirmed that the NYT's sources are the employees who were fired last week. If Hegseth did do what is alleged and those individuals were fired due to speaking up about it (or threatening to), that's going to be a mess. The "fired because of leaks" line is going to have to work hard to cover the optics of that one.
This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 11:29 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 11:31 am to cajunangelle
quote:This.
They won't be happy with anyone but a Lloyd Austin.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 11:40 am to LegendInMyMind
The optics to who exactly? A group of people that will find something bitch about regardless? F all that.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 11:47 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Hegseth on a group chat describing f-18 strikes to his wife and others. Yeah that sounds rea
Hey hon. OTW home. Need anything? BTW will be striking Houthi installations at 14:14 zulu. TTYL.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 12:17 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
The optics to who exactly? A group of people that will find something bitch about regardless? F all that.
Yeah, you're probably right. Creating a cover story and firing people because they were "leaking information" when in reality they were speaking out about your poor decision making as a leader isn't an issue at all.
Note: All of this is playing devil's advocate and coming from the point of view of this being proven true.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News