- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ATF lab report in Charlie Kirk murder case is out
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:13 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:13 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
"That's just what they waunt you to believe, " Dale from King of the Hill.
1
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
Why don’t you post the info you have and we can watch your claim unravel in real time.
Why don’t you post your rebuttal?
Why are you so anchored into the
MSM angle?
How would the other reports be bad for your political side?
I’m trying to understand your angle.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:19 pm to bamadontcare
I was being glib.
But I would bet $20 that someone reported that he had “encryption” on his phone. And what that meant is he had apps that use encryption on his phone. So Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp would all qualify as “encrypted” apps to a reporter or gadfly.
And in the end, it’s just a dumb kid with some pretty common apps on his phone. Not a super secret portal to China.
But I would bet $20 that someone reported that he had “encryption” on his phone. And what that meant is he had apps that use encryption on his phone. So Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp would all qualify as “encrypted” apps to a reporter or gadfly.
And in the end, it’s just a dumb kid with some pretty common apps on his phone. Not a super secret portal to China.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:19 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Why, so you can insult and name call him as you do anyone who doesnt share your exact world view?
Pretty sure I’ve only name called you because of your stupid takes. I asked him a question to which he answered and he didn’t randomly go on about an exploding microphone like you do. You were also insulted before my post because your world view is seen by the board as moronic with the stuff you post.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:19 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
How would the other reports be bad for your political side?
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:20 pm to Enadious
quote:
"That's just what they waunt you to believe, " Dale from King of the Hill.
Dale sure was on top of things, except for his wife being a hoe.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:21 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I'm not claiming he would need help with the actual act of shooting someone.
Then what?
Leftists ngos don't mean shite. They are ready for anything. And just because he may have been brainwashed by reddit or his discord echo chamber doesn't mean they colluded with this guy to kill Charlie.
He was definitely helped in thinking he should resort to this. But I'm saying no one had to actually help him pull this off.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:21 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
You believe Joe Hunt? That is like believing Vindma
I don't believe or disbelieve him. In conjunction with other bits of information though, I think it's enough to warrant deeper probes. Are you aware that Stephen Miller also said that he believes the transformer was likely linked to some sort of terror cell that was receiving funding from leftist groups? Is Stephen Miller also like Vindman?
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:21 pm to the808bass
quote:
was being glib. But I would bet $20 that someone reported that he had “encryption” on his phone. And what that meant is he had apps that use encryption on his phone. So Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp would all qualify as “encrypted” apps to a reporter or gadfly. And in the end, it’s just a dumb kid with some pretty common apps on his phone. Not a super secret portal to China.
That’s simply not true.
It was clearly reported that he had 3 phones and 2 of them had been in contact with foreign nations.
At least try to be accurate
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:22 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
It was clearly reported that he had 3 phones and 2 of them had been in contact with foreign nations.
Link it up baby.
We’ll watch it burn.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:24 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Then what?
I've already stated my position. I am not here to litigate anything. I am telling you I personally feel that deeper probes are warranted and I'm confounded that anyone wouldn't also support this. Why do you people want it all shut down and wrapped up with a bow?
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But engaging in that dishonesty is admitting your theory is wrong, effectively
The problem is news sites ran with the “bullet didn’t match the gun” headline and didn’t give the proper context that it didn’t match ANY gun
News sites doing it is unforgivable
This post was edited on 4/15/26 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:25 pm to Proximo
quote:
The problem is news sites ran with the “bullet didn’t match the gun” headline and didn’t give the proper context that it didn’t match ANY gun
News sites doing it is unforgivable
That was intentional
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:27 pm to Proximo
quote:
The problem is news sites ran with the “bullet didn’t match the gun” headline and didn’t give the proper context that it didn’t match ANY gun
Get those clicks and views, baby. Drive engagement.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:27 pm to Proximo
I think that was mainly the post and the aggregating the post right?
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
Link it up baby. We’ll watch it burn.
You seem very sure of yourself.
Do you really think your MSM reports
can erase what was disclosed?
Again, what is your motivation?
Why is your kind so adamant about this?
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
Daily Mail I think
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:29 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
your kind
I assume you mean “non-retarded” here.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:29 pm to Proximo
quote:
The problem is news sites ran with the “bullet didn’t match the gun” headline and didn’t give the proper context that it didn’t match ANY gun News sites doing it is unforgivable
Yep and people like Candace floating conspiracy theories isn’t helping the prosecution one bit. It’s weird how many on here think TR wasn’t the guy or setup. The defense loves that shite to draw doubt into this case.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:29 pm to bamadontcare
@grok calls bullshite to your fevered story..
quote:
No, there is no credible evidence that the man who shot Charlie Kirk (Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old suspect charged with his assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University) had 3 phones, with 2 of them in contact with foreign nations.
foxnews.com
Public reporting and court documents detail the evidence against Robinson, including:DNA and fingerprints/palm prints near the rooftop shooting position.
Cellphone data placing him at the scene.
Texts and messages (including to a roommate/partner and on Discord) where he referenced planning or taking the shot, a pre-written note about the "opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk," instructions to delete exchanges, and later confessions to family and friends.
The rifle (reportedly his grandfather's) recovered nearby, with engraved casings bearing messages like "Hey fascist! Catch!" and anti-fascist song references.
Multiple electronic devices seized from his home and his romantic partner's (computers, laptops, gaming systems, and cell phones), which investigators examined for communications and digital footprint showing an "obsession" with Kirk.
thehill.com
No mainstream or official sources mention Robinson possessing exactly three phones or any of his devices contacting foreign nations/governments. Foreign involvement claims have centered on post-shooting disinformation amplified by Russian, Chinese, and pro-Iranian actors online (e.g., pushing conspiracy theories about civil war or U.S. dysfunction), not direct operational links to the shooter himself.
thehill.com
Claims about "foreign phones" at the scene (sometimes specified as 12 Israeli ones) appear in some social media posts and conspiracy-oriented discussions (e.g., referencing Joe Kent or Candace Owens comments), but these are unverified, often tied to broader theories of a cover-up or foreign nexus that authorities allegedly suppressed. Official updates from the FBI, prosecutors, and court records focus on Robinson acting alone as a lone gunman motivated by personal/political hatred of Kirk's views, with no confirmed foreign operational ties or multiple "foreign-contact" phones belonging to him.
en.wikipedia.org
The investigation involved standard device analysis, location data, and communications review, but nothing in released warrants, charging documents, or FBI statements supports the specific "3 phones, 2 foreign contacts" detail. Such a claim, if true and significant, would likely have been highlighted in coverage of the case (which has included extensive leaks about texts, Discord, DNA, etc.). It seems to stem from unconfirmed online speculation rather than established facts.Charlie Kirk was killed by a single shot to the neck while speaking outdoors; Robinson was arrested shortly after, turned himself in with family involvement, and faces aggravated murder charges. The case remains ongoing, with some defense challenges (e.g., on ballistic links), but the core evidence points to a domestic lone actor. Always cross-check sensational details against primary sources like court filings or law enforcement releases, as conspiracy narratives proliferated quickly after the event.
8 posts
52 web pages
Explore foreign disinformation tactics
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News